Development of a risk score for colorectal cancer screening.

Q3 Medicine
Elham Maserat, Amir Sadeghi, Pardis Ketabi Moghadam, Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi
{"title":"Development of a risk score for colorectal cancer screening.","authors":"Elham Maserat, Amir Sadeghi, Pardis Ketabi Moghadam, Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi","doi":"10.22037/ghfbb.v18i3.3140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable scoring system for colorectal cancer risk assessment considering the effectiveness of different screening options.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. As a preventable disease, accurate risk assessment plays a critical role in early detection and prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from 3,465 individuals, including patients, first-degree, second-degree, and third-degree relatives of patients, and volunteers participating in a national CRC screening program. The dataset reflects nine years of prevention efforts targeting at-risk populations. Machine learning algorithms-Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, Neural Networks, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines (SVM)-were applied to the data. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation, ROC curves, F1 score, classification accuracy (CA), and overall accuracy metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,465 participants, 2,240 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, 60 were relatives of affected patients, and 1,086 were non-patient relatives. Among CRC patients, 1,979 were over the age of 40. Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes achieved the highest AUC values (0.910 and 0.907, respectively), with corresponding accuracies of 84.5% and 82.8%. Logistic Regression demonstrated the highest overall accuracy. The proposed scoring system incorporated variables such as age, sex, diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), smoking, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, BMI, family history, and five key symptoms: rectal bleeding, abdominal pain, unintended weight loss, changes in bowel habits, and anemia. The highest score was assigned to individuals over 60 years of age, while a score of 2 was allocated for a family history involving more than two affected relatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A scoring system based on easily measurable variables offers a practical and efficient tool for widespread clinical use. Such systems can assist healthcare professionals in streamlining risk assessment and improving early identification of high-risk individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12636,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","volume":"18 3","pages":"333-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12535784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v18i3.3140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable scoring system for colorectal cancer risk assessment considering the effectiveness of different screening options.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. As a preventable disease, accurate risk assessment plays a critical role in early detection and prevention strategies.

Methods: This study analyzed data from 3,465 individuals, including patients, first-degree, second-degree, and third-degree relatives of patients, and volunteers participating in a national CRC screening program. The dataset reflects nine years of prevention efforts targeting at-risk populations. Machine learning algorithms-Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, Neural Networks, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines (SVM)-were applied to the data. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation, ROC curves, F1 score, classification accuracy (CA), and overall accuracy metrics.

Results: Of the 3,465 participants, 2,240 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, 60 were relatives of affected patients, and 1,086 were non-patient relatives. Among CRC patients, 1,979 were over the age of 40. Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes achieved the highest AUC values (0.910 and 0.907, respectively), with corresponding accuracies of 84.5% and 82.8%. Logistic Regression demonstrated the highest overall accuracy. The proposed scoring system incorporated variables such as age, sex, diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), smoking, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, BMI, family history, and five key symptoms: rectal bleeding, abdominal pain, unintended weight loss, changes in bowel habits, and anemia. The highest score was assigned to individuals over 60 years of age, while a score of 2 was allocated for a family history involving more than two affected relatives.

Conclusion: A scoring system based on easily measurable variables offers a practical and efficient tool for widespread clinical use. Such systems can assist healthcare professionals in streamlining risk assessment and improving early identification of high-risk individuals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

结直肠癌筛查风险评分的发展。
目的:本研究的目的是考虑不同筛查方案的有效性,开发一种简单可靠的结直肠癌风险评估评分系统。背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一。作为一种可预防的疾病,准确的风险评估在早期发现和预防战略中起着至关重要的作用。方法:本研究分析了来自3,465个人的数据,包括患者、患者的一级、二级和三级亲属,以及参加国家CRC筛查计划的志愿者。该数据集反映了9年来针对高危人群的预防工作。机器学习算法-逻辑回归,Naïve贝叶斯,神经网络,随机森林和支持向量机(SVM)-应用于数据。采用交叉验证、ROC曲线、F1评分、分类精度(CA)和总体精度指标评估模型性能。结果:在3465名参与者中,2240人被诊断为结直肠癌,60人是受影响患者的亲属,1086人是非患者亲属。在结直肠癌患者中,年龄在40岁以上的有1979例。Logistic回归和Naïve Bayes的AUC值最高,分别为0.910和0.907,准确率分别为84.5%和82.8%。逻辑回归显示出最高的总体准确性。提出的评分系统纳入了年龄、性别、糖尿病、炎症性肠病(IBD)、吸烟、饮酒、吸烟、BMI、家族史等变量,以及五个关键症状:直肠出血、腹痛、意外体重减轻、排便习惯改变和贫血。60岁以上的人得分最高,而有两个以上患病亲属的家族史的人得分为2分。结论:基于易测量变量的评分系统为临床广泛应用提供了一种实用有效的工具。这样的系统可以帮助医疗保健专业人员简化风险评估和提高早期识别高风险个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书