Elif Car, Liese Barbier, Ingrid Schwarzenberger, Isabelle Huys, Steven Simoens, Arnold G Vulto
{"title":"Toward Regulatory Convergence and Streamlined Biosimilar Development: Recommendations from an International Qualitative Study.","authors":"Elif Car, Liese Barbier, Ingrid Schwarzenberger, Isabelle Huys, Steven Simoens, Arnold G Vulto","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00746-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess perspectives of stakeholders on scientific and regulatory challenges associated with biosimilarity demonstration and to formulate consensus-based recommendations to foster regulatory convergence and streamline biosimilar development globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Nominal Group Technique with an international panel of regulators, academics, and industry representatives involved three phases: (i) first individual grading, (ii) focus group discussions, and (iii) second individual grading. High consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement with a weighted mean score of ≥ 4.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, four focus groups were held in September 2023 with 21 participants (2 academics, 7 regulators, and 12 industry representatives). In total, 22 recommendations were proposed, with 16 obtaining high consensus. Highest-rated recommendations included enhancing stakeholder education on science-based biosimilarity principles (mean score: 4.65/5), promoting regulatory convergence through reliance (mean score: 4.65/5), aligning regulatory requirements based on current scientific knowledge (mean score: 4.60/5), reconsidering the requirement for comparative clinical efficacy studies (mean score: 4.65/5), harmonizing reference product selection criteria (mean score: 4.55/5), facilitating proactive knowledge sharing among regulators (mean score: 4.50/5), eliminating in vivo animal studies (mean score: 4.50/5), and accepting clinical studies conducted for global submissions (mean score: 4.50/5). Two recommendations received the lowest consensus: providing incentives for the development of new pharmacodynamic biomarkers (mean score: 2.80/5) and developing distinct International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines for biosimilar assessment (mean score: 3.20/5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The consensus-based recommendations identified in this study outline priority areas and measures for streamlining biosimilar development and fostering regulatory convergence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioDrugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-025-00746-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to assess perspectives of stakeholders on scientific and regulatory challenges associated with biosimilarity demonstration and to formulate consensus-based recommendations to foster regulatory convergence and streamline biosimilar development globally.
Methods: A modified Nominal Group Technique with an international panel of regulators, academics, and industry representatives involved three phases: (i) first individual grading, (ii) focus group discussions, and (iii) second individual grading. High consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement with a weighted mean score of ≥ 4.0.
Results: Overall, four focus groups were held in September 2023 with 21 participants (2 academics, 7 regulators, and 12 industry representatives). In total, 22 recommendations were proposed, with 16 obtaining high consensus. Highest-rated recommendations included enhancing stakeholder education on science-based biosimilarity principles (mean score: 4.65/5), promoting regulatory convergence through reliance (mean score: 4.65/5), aligning regulatory requirements based on current scientific knowledge (mean score: 4.60/5), reconsidering the requirement for comparative clinical efficacy studies (mean score: 4.65/5), harmonizing reference product selection criteria (mean score: 4.55/5), facilitating proactive knowledge sharing among regulators (mean score: 4.50/5), eliminating in vivo animal studies (mean score: 4.50/5), and accepting clinical studies conducted for global submissions (mean score: 4.50/5). Two recommendations received the lowest consensus: providing incentives for the development of new pharmacodynamic biomarkers (mean score: 2.80/5) and developing distinct International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines for biosimilar assessment (mean score: 3.20/5).
Conclusions: The consensus-based recommendations identified in this study outline priority areas and measures for streamlining biosimilar development and fostering regulatory convergence.
期刊介绍:
An essential resource for R&D professionals and clinicians with an interest in biologic therapies.
BioDrugs covers the development and therapeutic application of biotechnology-based pharmaceuticals and diagnostic products for the treatment of human disease.
BioDrugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.