Toward Regulatory Convergence and Streamlined Biosimilar Development: Recommendations from an International Qualitative Study.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Elif Car, Liese Barbier, Ingrid Schwarzenberger, Isabelle Huys, Steven Simoens, Arnold G Vulto
{"title":"Toward Regulatory Convergence and Streamlined Biosimilar Development: Recommendations from an International Qualitative Study.","authors":"Elif Car, Liese Barbier, Ingrid Schwarzenberger, Isabelle Huys, Steven Simoens, Arnold G Vulto","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00746-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess perspectives of stakeholders on scientific and regulatory challenges associated with biosimilarity demonstration and to formulate consensus-based recommendations to foster regulatory convergence and streamline biosimilar development globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Nominal Group Technique with an international panel of regulators, academics, and industry representatives involved three phases: (i) first individual grading, (ii) focus group discussions, and (iii) second individual grading. High consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement with a weighted mean score of ≥ 4.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, four focus groups were held in September 2023 with 21 participants (2 academics, 7 regulators, and 12 industry representatives). In total, 22 recommendations were proposed, with 16 obtaining high consensus. Highest-rated recommendations included enhancing stakeholder education on science-based biosimilarity principles (mean score: 4.65/5), promoting regulatory convergence through reliance (mean score: 4.65/5), aligning regulatory requirements based on current scientific knowledge (mean score: 4.60/5), reconsidering the requirement for comparative clinical efficacy studies (mean score: 4.65/5), harmonizing reference product selection criteria (mean score: 4.55/5), facilitating proactive knowledge sharing among regulators (mean score: 4.50/5), eliminating in vivo animal studies (mean score: 4.50/5), and accepting clinical studies conducted for global submissions (mean score: 4.50/5). Two recommendations received the lowest consensus: providing incentives for the development of new pharmacodynamic biomarkers (mean score: 2.80/5) and developing distinct International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines for biosimilar assessment (mean score: 3.20/5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The consensus-based recommendations identified in this study outline priority areas and measures for streamlining biosimilar development and fostering regulatory convergence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioDrugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-025-00746-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to assess perspectives of stakeholders on scientific and regulatory challenges associated with biosimilarity demonstration and to formulate consensus-based recommendations to foster regulatory convergence and streamline biosimilar development globally.

Methods: A modified Nominal Group Technique with an international panel of regulators, academics, and industry representatives involved three phases: (i) first individual grading, (ii) focus group discussions, and (iii) second individual grading. High consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement with a weighted mean score of ≥ 4.0.

Results: Overall, four focus groups were held in September 2023 with 21 participants (2 academics, 7 regulators, and 12 industry representatives). In total, 22 recommendations were proposed, with 16 obtaining high consensus. Highest-rated recommendations included enhancing stakeholder education on science-based biosimilarity principles (mean score: 4.65/5), promoting regulatory convergence through reliance (mean score: 4.65/5), aligning regulatory requirements based on current scientific knowledge (mean score: 4.60/5), reconsidering the requirement for comparative clinical efficacy studies (mean score: 4.65/5), harmonizing reference product selection criteria (mean score: 4.55/5), facilitating proactive knowledge sharing among regulators (mean score: 4.50/5), eliminating in vivo animal studies (mean score: 4.50/5), and accepting clinical studies conducted for global submissions (mean score: 4.50/5). Two recommendations received the lowest consensus: providing incentives for the development of new pharmacodynamic biomarkers (mean score: 2.80/5) and developing distinct International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines for biosimilar assessment (mean score: 3.20/5).

Conclusions: The consensus-based recommendations identified in this study outline priority areas and measures for streamlining biosimilar development and fostering regulatory convergence.

迈向监管趋同和简化生物类似药开发:来自国际定性研究的建议。
目的:本研究旨在评估利益相关者对与生物仿制药论证相关的科学和监管挑战的观点,并制定基于共识的建议,以促进监管趋同和简化全球生物仿制药的开发。方法:一种改良的名义小组技术,由监管者、学者和行业代表组成的国际小组参与三个阶段:(i)第一次个人评分,(ii)焦点小组讨论,(iii)第二次个人评分。高一致性定义为≥80%的一致性,加权平均评分≥4.0。结果:总体而言,在2023年9月举行了四个焦点小组,共有21名参与者(2名学者,7名监管机构和12名行业代表)。共提出22项建议,其中16项获得高度一致意见。评分最高的建议包括加强利益相关者对基于科学的生物相似性原则的教育(平均得分:4.65/5),通过信赖促进监管趋同(平均得分:4.65/5),根据当前的科学知识调整监管要求(平均得分:4.60/5),重新考虑比较临床疗效研究的要求(平均得分:4.65/5),协调参考产品选择标准(平均得分:4.55/5),促进监管机构之间的主动知识共享(平均得分:4.50/5),取消体内动物研究(平均得分:4.50/5),接受全球提交的临床研究(平均得分:4.50/5)。两项建议获得了最低的共识:为开发新的药效学生物标志物提供激励(平均得分:2.80/5)和制定独特的国际人用药品技术要求协调委员会生物仿制药评估指南(平均得分:3.20/5)。结论:本研究确定的基于共识的建议概述了简化生物类似药开发和促进监管趋同的优先领域和措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioDrugs
BioDrugs 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An essential resource for R&D professionals and clinicians with an interest in biologic therapies. BioDrugs covers the development and therapeutic application of biotechnology-based pharmaceuticals and diagnostic products for the treatment of human disease. BioDrugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信