A CFD-Based Digital Framework for Scaling Optimization of Orbital Rocking Bioreactors

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Soo Hyun Ryu, Young Jin Kim, Jae Hong Jeon, Minjun Ji, Tae Hyeong Kim, Kyung Nam Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Tack-Joong Kim, Jong Kwang Hong
{"title":"A CFD-Based Digital Framework for Scaling Optimization of Orbital Rocking Bioreactors","authors":"Soo Hyun Ryu,&nbsp;Young Jin Kim,&nbsp;Jae Hong Jeon,&nbsp;Minjun Ji,&nbsp;Tae Hyeong Kim,&nbsp;Kyung Nam Kim,&nbsp;Dong-Hoon Yang,&nbsp;Tack-Joong Kim,&nbsp;Jong Kwang Hong","doi":"10.1002/biot.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Robust scale-up of bioreactor systems requires hydrodynamic similarity across scales to ensure consistent cell culture performance. This study presents a computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-guided digital framework for optimizing the scale-up of a novel orbital rocking bioreactor, CELBIC, from CELBIC5 (working volume 1–2 L) to CELBIC50 (working volume 10–20 L). Using lattice Boltzmann-based simulations, key hydrodynamic parameters, including velocity, shear stress, and energy dissipation rate, were evaluated across various working volumes, inclination angles, and agitation speeds. Compared with conventional scale-up criteria, such as average P/V, we propose a comprehensive and digitalized scale-up optimization framework: a root mean square error (RMSE)-based method comparing the full spatial and temporal distributions of various CFD variables to quantify similarities among scaled-up conditions. This approach allows identification of the best-matching scaled-up condition and further refinement using response surface analysis. The optimized condition (10 L, 7°, and 19 rpm) exhibited the lowest combined RMSE relative to the reference condition (CELBIC5 at 1 L, 6°, and 30 rpm), suggesting substantial hydrodynamic equivalence. Overall, this study demonstrates how integrating CFD- and RMSE-based analyses enables rational scale-up of orbital rocking bioreactors, offering a systematic strategy for digital process development in single-use systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":134,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Journal","volume":"20 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/biot.70138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robust scale-up of bioreactor systems requires hydrodynamic similarity across scales to ensure consistent cell culture performance. This study presents a computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-guided digital framework for optimizing the scale-up of a novel orbital rocking bioreactor, CELBIC, from CELBIC5 (working volume 1–2 L) to CELBIC50 (working volume 10–20 L). Using lattice Boltzmann-based simulations, key hydrodynamic parameters, including velocity, shear stress, and energy dissipation rate, were evaluated across various working volumes, inclination angles, and agitation speeds. Compared with conventional scale-up criteria, such as average P/V, we propose a comprehensive and digitalized scale-up optimization framework: a root mean square error (RMSE)-based method comparing the full spatial and temporal distributions of various CFD variables to quantify similarities among scaled-up conditions. This approach allows identification of the best-matching scaled-up condition and further refinement using response surface analysis. The optimized condition (10 L, 7°, and 19 rpm) exhibited the lowest combined RMSE relative to the reference condition (CELBIC5 at 1 L, 6°, and 30 rpm), suggesting substantial hydrodynamic equivalence. Overall, this study demonstrates how integrating CFD- and RMSE-based analyses enables rational scale-up of orbital rocking bioreactors, offering a systematic strategy for digital process development in single-use systems.

基于cfd的轨道摇摆生物反应器缩放优化数字框架。
生物反应器系统的稳健放大需要跨尺度的流体动力学相似性,以确保一致的细胞培养性能。本研究提出了一个计算流体动力学(CFD)指导的数字框架,用于优化新型轨道摇摆生物反应器CELBIC的放大,从CELBIC5(工作体积1-2 L)到CELBIC50(工作体积10-20 L)。利用基于晶格玻尔兹曼的模拟,在不同的工作体积、倾角和搅拌速度下,评估了关键的流体动力学参数,包括速度、剪切应力和能量耗散率。与传统的放大标准(如平均P/V)相比,我们提出了一个全面的数字化放大优化框架:基于均方根误差(RMSE)的方法,比较各种CFD变量的完整时空分布,以量化放大条件之间的相似性。这种方法允许识别最佳匹配的放大条件,并使用响应面分析进一步细化。优化条件(10升,7°,19 rpm)相对于参考条件(1升,6°,30 rpm)显示出最低的综合RMSE,表明基本的流体动力学等效。总体而言,本研究展示了基于CFD和rmse的集成分析如何能够合理地扩大轨道摇摆生物反应器的规模,为一次性系统的数字过程开发提供系统策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotechnology Journal
Biotechnology Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Biotechnology Journal (2019 Journal Citation Reports: 3.543) is fully comprehensive in its scope and publishes strictly peer-reviewed papers covering novel aspects and methods in all areas of biotechnology. Some issues are devoted to a special topic, providing the latest information on the most crucial areas of research and technological advances. In addition to these special issues, the journal welcomes unsolicited submissions for primary research articles, such as Research Articles, Rapid Communications and Biotech Methods. BTJ also welcomes proposals of Review Articles - please send in a brief outline of the article and the senior author''s CV to the editorial office. BTJ promotes a special emphasis on: Systems Biotechnology Synthetic Biology and Metabolic Engineering Nanobiotechnology and Biomaterials Tissue engineering, Regenerative Medicine and Stem cells Gene Editing, Gene therapy and Immunotherapy Omics technologies Industrial Biotechnology, Biopharmaceuticals and Biocatalysis Bioprocess engineering and Downstream processing Plant Biotechnology Biosafety, Biotech Ethics, Science Communication Methods and Advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书