Detector response and dose calculation lateral to material interfaces for 6 MV photon beam

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jonas Ringholz, Otto Andreas Sauer, Sonja Wegener
{"title":"Detector response and dose calculation lateral to material interfaces for 6 MV photon beam","authors":"Jonas Ringholz,&nbsp;Otto Andreas Sauer,&nbsp;Sonja Wegener","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dose calculation around inhomogeneities is challenging for many algorithms. A validation of dose distributions in these conditions is not straightforward, as detector response close to material interfaces is affected by the non-equilibrium situation, the changing energy spectrum and the volume effect in a steep dose gradient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Detector response lateral to an inhomogeneity of high density was studied, mimicking the situation of bone surrounded by soft tissue.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Profiles obtained with different detectors (diodes, ion chamber, synthetic diamond) in water in the vicinity of an aluminum cylinder were compared. Dose deposition was also calculated with different commercial treatment planning systems and algorithms as well as using Monte Carlo simulations within and lateral to the cylinder and compared to measurements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Dose deposition in the vicinity of an inserted aluminum cylinder changes and is registered by the detectors to a different degree. The ion chamber shows the largest change irradiated with a 10×10 cm<sup>2</sup> at 3 mm distance from the cylinder surface (2.5%), followed by the synthetic diamond (1.7%), then the unshielded (1.4%) and finally the shielded diode (1.0%). Dose calculated by different commercial dose engines differed up to 3% at that point from the detector values (Collapsed Cone).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Dose calculation near inhomogeneities depends on the used algorithm, dose measurements in the same region differ depending on the detector type used. We recommend verification of dose calculation with second type of algorithm and measurements with at least two detector types.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70302","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Dose calculation around inhomogeneities is challenging for many algorithms. A validation of dose distributions in these conditions is not straightforward, as detector response close to material interfaces is affected by the non-equilibrium situation, the changing energy spectrum and the volume effect in a steep dose gradient.

Purpose

Detector response lateral to an inhomogeneity of high density was studied, mimicking the situation of bone surrounded by soft tissue.

Methods

Profiles obtained with different detectors (diodes, ion chamber, synthetic diamond) in water in the vicinity of an aluminum cylinder were compared. Dose deposition was also calculated with different commercial treatment planning systems and algorithms as well as using Monte Carlo simulations within and lateral to the cylinder and compared to measurements.

Results

Dose deposition in the vicinity of an inserted aluminum cylinder changes and is registered by the detectors to a different degree. The ion chamber shows the largest change irradiated with a 10×10 cm2 at 3 mm distance from the cylinder surface (2.5%), followed by the synthetic diamond (1.7%), then the unshielded (1.4%) and finally the shielded diode (1.0%). Dose calculated by different commercial dose engines differed up to 3% at that point from the detector values (Collapsed Cone).

Conclusions

Dose calculation near inhomogeneities depends on the used algorithm, dose measurements in the same region differ depending on the detector type used. We recommend verification of dose calculation with second type of algorithm and measurements with at least two detector types.

Abstract Image

6 MV光子束材料界面侧探测器响应及剂量计算
对于许多算法来说,不均匀性下的背景剂量计算具有挑战性。在这些条件下,剂量分布的验证并不简单,因为靠近材料界面的探测器响应受到非平衡情况、变化的能谱和陡峭剂量梯度下的体积效应的影响。目的模拟软组织包围骨的情况,研究检测器对高密度非均匀性的侧向响应。方法比较不同探测器(二极管、离子室、人造金刚石)在铝圆筒附近水体中的分布。剂量沉积也通过不同的商业处理计划系统和算法进行计算,并使用蒙特卡罗模拟在圆柱体内部和侧面,并与测量结果进行比较。结果在插入的铝筒附近的剂量沉积发生了变化,并在不同程度上被检测器记录。离子室在距圆柱体表面3mm处辐照变化最大,为10×10 cm2(2.5%),其次是合成金刚石(1.7%),其次是未屏蔽二极管(1.4%),最后是屏蔽二极管(1.0%)。不同商业剂量机计算出的剂量在该点与探测器值相差达3%(塌锥)。结论近不均匀剂量计算取决于所使用的算法,同一区域的剂量测量值取决于所使用的探测器类型。我们建议使用第二种算法验证剂量计算,并使用至少两种检测器进行测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信