Guesswork Analysis of Guessing Decoding of Short Codes

Jifan Liang;Yanzhi Chen;Xiao Ma
{"title":"Guesswork Analysis of Guessing Decoding of Short Codes","authors":"Jifan Liang;Yanzhi Chen;Xiao Ma","doi":"10.23919/JCIN.2025.11207212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses: how many guesses are needed for maximum-likelihood (ML) performance by guessing decoding of short binary linear block codes—guessing random additive noise decoding (GRAND) and guessing codeword decoding (GCD)? We show the required guesswork depends weakly on code structure: codes with the same length n and dimension k and comparable ML performance need a similar number of guesses. For random codes, the GRAND guesswork is on the order ε<inf>RCU</inf>2<sup>n-k</sup><sup>—</sup>, where ε<inf>RCU</inf> is the random-coding union bound, tightening the trivial order 2<sup>n-k</sup>. We derive a universal upper bound on the number of (partial) test error patterns (TEPs), which is then evaluated accurately with a saddlepoint approximation. Analysis and simulations show that, in terms of guesswork, GCD never exceeds and often improves on GRAND, notably at low rates. To further reduce guesswork, we introduce an ordered-statistics decoder with local constraints (LC-OSD), derived by extending the most reliable basis and incorporating an early stopping rule. To reduce the decoding latency, we propose a parallel LC-OSD that utilizes pre-stored TEPs. Simulations of binary images of Reed-Solomon codes, which approach the randomcoding union (RCU) bound, confirm our analysis and demonstrate the superiority of soft-weight ordering over Hamming-weight ordering.","PeriodicalId":100766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communications and Information Networks","volume":"10 3","pages":"287-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communications and Information Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11207212/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses: how many guesses are needed for maximum-likelihood (ML) performance by guessing decoding of short binary linear block codes—guessing random additive noise decoding (GRAND) and guessing codeword decoding (GCD)? We show the required guesswork depends weakly on code structure: codes with the same length n and dimension k and comparable ML performance need a similar number of guesses. For random codes, the GRAND guesswork is on the order εRCU2n-k—, where εRCU is the random-coding union bound, tightening the trivial order 2n-k. We derive a universal upper bound on the number of (partial) test error patterns (TEPs), which is then evaluated accurately with a saddlepoint approximation. Analysis and simulations show that, in terms of guesswork, GCD never exceeds and often improves on GRAND, notably at low rates. To further reduce guesswork, we introduce an ordered-statistics decoder with local constraints (LC-OSD), derived by extending the most reliable basis and incorporating an early stopping rule. To reduce the decoding latency, we propose a parallel LC-OSD that utilizes pre-stored TEPs. Simulations of binary images of Reed-Solomon codes, which approach the randomcoding union (RCU) bound, confirm our analysis and demonstrate the superiority of soft-weight ordering over Hamming-weight ordering.
短码猜测译码的猜测分析
本文讨论:通过猜测短二进制线性分组码的解码-猜测随机加性噪声解码(GRAND)和猜测码字解码(GCD),需要猜测多少次才能达到最大似然(ML)性能?我们展示了所需的猜测工作弱依赖于代码结构:具有相同长度n和维度k的代码以及可比较的ML性能需要相似的猜测次数。对于随机码,大猜想是在εRCU2n-k -阶上,其中εRCU是随机编码的联合界,收紧了平凡阶2n-k。我们推导了(部分)测试误差模式(TEPs)数量的普遍上界,然后用鞍点近似准确地评估了这个上界。分析和模拟表明,从猜测的角度来看,GCD从未超过GRAND,而且经常有所改善,特别是在低速率下。为了进一步减少猜测,我们引入了一个具有局部约束的有序统计解码器(LC-OSD),该解码器通过扩展最可靠的基础并结合早期停止规则而派生。为了减少解码延迟,我们提出了一种利用预存储tep的并行LC-OSD。对接近随机编码联合(RCU)界的Reed-Solomon码的二值图像进行了仿真,验证了我们的分析,并证明了软权排序优于汉明权排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书