Validation of an AI-Based Anatomical Landmark Recognition System for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Gynecologic Surgery

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
S Takenaka , H Matsuzaki , M Homma , A Kouno , Y Nakanishi , N Takeshita , H Tanabe , Y Tsukada
{"title":"Validation of an AI-Based Anatomical Landmark Recognition System for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Gynecologic Surgery","authors":"S Takenaka ,&nbsp;H Matsuzaki ,&nbsp;M Homma ,&nbsp;A Kouno ,&nbsp;Y Nakanishi ,&nbsp;N Takeshita ,&nbsp;H Tanabe ,&nbsp;Y Tsukada","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>To evaluate whether an AI-based anatomical landmark recognition support system for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) can improve the anatomical recognition abilities of gynecologic surgeons with varying levels of surgical expertise.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective, multi-arm observer performance study evaluating organ recognition with and without AI support.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A total of 640 laparoscopic video clips were prepared from 10 hysterectomy cases: 320 without AI overlay and 320 with AI. Each set included clips with and without the ureter, obturator nerve, external iliac artery, and vein.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>Twelve gynecologic surgeons were enrolled and stratified into three experience-based groups: Group A (4 laparoscopic board-certified experts), Group B (4 obstetrics and gynecology specialists without laparoscopic certification), and Group C (4 trainees in residency). Each participant provided consent. The study was conducted over a one-month period.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Participants were first asked to identify key pelvic structures (ureter, obturator nerve, external iliac vessels) in selected video clips without AI assistance. Subsequently, they reviewed the clips with AI-based overlay highlighting the anatomical targets and repeated the identification task.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Primary Results</h3><div>Accuracy of anatomical recognition (sensitivity and specificity) was calculated for each group with and without AI support. Across all groups, AI support improved identification of the ureter (mean sensitivity from 47.1% to 67.9%), obturator nerve (65.2% to 78.8%), external iliac artery (83.5% to 91.9%) and vein (71.3% to 90.0%) with all p-values &lt; 0.05. The greatest improvement was observed in the trainee group (Group C), suggesting AI assistance is particularly beneficial for less experienced surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AI-based anatomical landmark recognition support system for PLND significantly enhanced surgeon’s organ recognition across all experience levels, with the most pronounced benefit observed in trainees. These findings support integrating AI systems into surgical education and real-time intraoperative guidance to improve anatomical understanding and reduce the risk of injury. Further studies in live surgical settings are warranted to assess real-world impact on clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":"32 11","pages":"Page S3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465025003450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objective

To evaluate whether an AI-based anatomical landmark recognition support system for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) can improve the anatomical recognition abilities of gynecologic surgeons with varying levels of surgical expertise.

Design

Prospective, multi-arm observer performance study evaluating organ recognition with and without AI support.

Setting

A total of 640 laparoscopic video clips were prepared from 10 hysterectomy cases: 320 without AI overlay and 320 with AI. Each set included clips with and without the ureter, obturator nerve, external iliac artery, and vein.

Patients or Participants

Twelve gynecologic surgeons were enrolled and stratified into three experience-based groups: Group A (4 laparoscopic board-certified experts), Group B (4 obstetrics and gynecology specialists without laparoscopic certification), and Group C (4 trainees in residency). Each participant provided consent. The study was conducted over a one-month period.

Interventions

Participants were first asked to identify key pelvic structures (ureter, obturator nerve, external iliac vessels) in selected video clips without AI assistance. Subsequently, they reviewed the clips with AI-based overlay highlighting the anatomical targets and repeated the identification task.

Measurements and Primary Results

Accuracy of anatomical recognition (sensitivity and specificity) was calculated for each group with and without AI support. Across all groups, AI support improved identification of the ureter (mean sensitivity from 47.1% to 67.9%), obturator nerve (65.2% to 78.8%), external iliac artery (83.5% to 91.9%) and vein (71.3% to 90.0%) with all p-values < 0.05. The greatest improvement was observed in the trainee group (Group C), suggesting AI assistance is particularly beneficial for less experienced surgeons.

Conclusion

The AI-based anatomical landmark recognition support system for PLND significantly enhanced surgeon’s organ recognition across all experience levels, with the most pronounced benefit observed in trainees. These findings support integrating AI systems into surgical education and real-time intraoperative guidance to improve anatomical understanding and reduce the risk of injury. Further studies in live surgical settings are warranted to assess real-world impact on clinical outcomes.
基于人工智能的妇科手术盆腔淋巴结清扫解剖标志识别系统的验证
研究目的评价基于人工智能的骨盆淋巴结清扫(PLND)解剖地标识别支持系统是否能提高不同手术专业水平的妇科外科医生的解剖识别能力。设计前瞻性、多臂观察表现研究,评估有和没有人工智能支持的器官识别。选取10例子宫切除术患者,共准备640个腹腔镜视频片段,其中不覆盖AI 320个,覆盖AI 320个。每组包括输尿管夹、闭孔神经夹、髂外动脉夹和静脉夹。纳入12名妇科外科医生,并根据经验分为3组:A组(4名经腹腔镜委员会认证的专家)、B组(4名未获腹腔镜认证的妇产科专家)和C组(4名住院实习医师)。每位参与者都提供了同意。这项研究进行了一个月。在没有人工智能辅助的情况下,参与者首先被要求在选定的视频片段中识别关键的骨盆结构(输尿管、闭孔神经、髂外血管)。随后,他们用基于人工智能的覆盖来突出解剖目标,并重复识别任务。在有无人工智能支持的情况下,计算各组解剖识别的准确性(敏感性和特异性)。在所有组中,人工智能支持提高对输尿管(平均灵敏度从47.1%到67.9%)、闭孔神经(65.2%到78.8%)、髂外动脉(83.5%到91.9%)和静脉(71.3%到90.0%)的识别,p值均为<; 0.05。在实习生组(C组)观察到最大的改善,这表明人工智能辅助对经验不足的外科医生特别有益。结论基于人工智能的PLND解剖地标识别支持系统可显著提高外科医生各经验水平的器官识别能力,其中以培训生的效果最为明显。这些发现支持将人工智能系统整合到外科教育和实时术中指导中,以提高解剖学理解并降低损伤风险。在现场手术环境下的进一步研究是有必要的,以评估对临床结果的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信