Impact of a Real-Time Ventilator Management Dashboard With Alerts

IF 2.7
CHEST critical care Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100167
Pranai Tandon MD , Kim-Anh-Nhi Nguyen MS , Ganesh Raut MS , Yuxia Ouyang PhD , Satya N. Cheetirala MS , Shamsuddoha Ranginwala MBA, RRT-NPS , Gary Oldenburg MS, RRT-NPS , Neha S. Dangayach MD , Samuel O. Acquah MD , Roopa Kohli-Seth MD , Prem Timsina ScD , Arash M. Kia MD , Robert Freeman DNP , Natalia Egorova PhD , Matthew A. Levin MD , Charles A. Powell MD, MBA
{"title":"Impact of a Real-Time Ventilator Management Dashboard With Alerts","authors":"Pranai Tandon MD ,&nbsp;Kim-Anh-Nhi Nguyen MS ,&nbsp;Ganesh Raut MS ,&nbsp;Yuxia Ouyang PhD ,&nbsp;Satya N. Cheetirala MS ,&nbsp;Shamsuddoha Ranginwala MBA, RRT-NPS ,&nbsp;Gary Oldenburg MS, RRT-NPS ,&nbsp;Neha S. Dangayach MD ,&nbsp;Samuel O. Acquah MD ,&nbsp;Roopa Kohli-Seth MD ,&nbsp;Prem Timsina ScD ,&nbsp;Arash M. Kia MD ,&nbsp;Robert Freeman DNP ,&nbsp;Natalia Egorova PhD ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Levin MD ,&nbsp;Charles A. Powell MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Exposure to high tidal volumes in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with increased mortality and worse outcomes. However, adherence to lung-protective ventilation (LPV) is suboptimal. No generalizable tool or approach exists that has been demonstrated to optimize implementation of this parameter of mechanical ventilation.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>We tested whether development and deployment of a real-time ventilator management dashboard with twice-daily alerts communicating synthesized ventilator information to clinicians would improve adherence to LPV (≤ 8 mL/kg ideal body weight).</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>The Respiratory Insights Dashboard was developed to display key real-time patient and ventilator data for all patients in the ICU of a large academic medical center, as well as to send twice daily email alerts to ICU staff identifying patients with out-of-range parameters. The 5 ICUs with lowest tidal volume adherence were preselected for analysis in a quasiexperimental study comparing the periods before and after the dashboard.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the period before the intervention, 1,376 patients received ventilation, and in the period after the intervention, 3,064 patients received ventilation. Hourly adherence to LPV rose from 78% to 87% (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). In patients initiated on ventilation with tidal volume (Vt) of &gt; 8 mL/kg, the time to reach adherence fell from a median of 9 hours (interquartile range, 2-26 hours) to 5 hours (interquartile range, 1-15 hours; <em>P</em> = .048). Interrupted time series regression showed that temporal trends both before and after the intervention were not significantly different from zero; however, adherence level change after the intervention was 8.3 (<em>P</em> = .004). Increased adherence to LPV also was observed in multivariable regression (OR, 1.438; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), along with an increase in adherence trend over time after implementation (OR, 1.001; <em>P</em> = .004).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In this study, a real-time ventilator management dashboard with Vt alerts was shown to significantly improve adherence to LPV hospital wide as well as more rapid correction of suboptimal ventilator settings. Implementation was associated with an increase in LPV adherence that has persisted for 15 months of follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788425000401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Exposure to high tidal volumes in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with increased mortality and worse outcomes. However, adherence to lung-protective ventilation (LPV) is suboptimal. No generalizable tool or approach exists that has been demonstrated to optimize implementation of this parameter of mechanical ventilation.

Research Question

We tested whether development and deployment of a real-time ventilator management dashboard with twice-daily alerts communicating synthesized ventilator information to clinicians would improve adherence to LPV (≤ 8 mL/kg ideal body weight).

Study Design and Methods

The Respiratory Insights Dashboard was developed to display key real-time patient and ventilator data for all patients in the ICU of a large academic medical center, as well as to send twice daily email alerts to ICU staff identifying patients with out-of-range parameters. The 5 ICUs with lowest tidal volume adherence were preselected for analysis in a quasiexperimental study comparing the periods before and after the dashboard.

Results

In the period before the intervention, 1,376 patients received ventilation, and in the period after the intervention, 3,064 patients received ventilation. Hourly adherence to LPV rose from 78% to 87% (P < .001). In patients initiated on ventilation with tidal volume (Vt) of > 8 mL/kg, the time to reach adherence fell from a median of 9 hours (interquartile range, 2-26 hours) to 5 hours (interquartile range, 1-15 hours; P = .048). Interrupted time series regression showed that temporal trends both before and after the intervention were not significantly different from zero; however, adherence level change after the intervention was 8.3 (P = .004). Increased adherence to LPV also was observed in multivariable regression (OR, 1.438; P < .001), along with an increase in adherence trend over time after implementation (OR, 1.001; P = .004).

Interpretation

In this study, a real-time ventilator management dashboard with Vt alerts was shown to significantly improve adherence to LPV hospital wide as well as more rapid correction of suboptimal ventilator settings. Implementation was associated with an increase in LPV adherence that has persisted for 15 months of follow-up.
带警报的实时呼吸机管理仪表板的影响
背景:接受有创机械通气的患者暴露于高潮气量与死亡率增加和预后恶化相关。然而,坚持肺保护性通气(LPV)是不理想的。没有可推广的工具或方法存在,已被证明优化实施机械通气的这一参数。研究问题:我们测试了开发和部署一个实时呼吸机管理仪表板,该仪表板每天两次向临床医生发出警报,将合成的呼吸机信息传达给临床医生,是否会提高LPV(≤8 mL/kg理想体重)的依从性。研究设计和方法开发了Respiratory Insights Dashboard,用于显示某大型学术医疗中心ICU所有患者的关键实时患者和呼吸机数据,并向ICU工作人员发送每日两次的电子邮件提醒,以识别参数超出范围的患者。在一项准实验研究中,预先选择潮汐容量粘附最低的5个icu进行分析,比较仪表板前后的时间。结果干预前通气1376例,干预后通气3064例。LPV的小时依从性从78%上升到87% (P < .001)。在潮气量(Vt)为8ml /kg的患者中,达到依从性的时间从中位数9小时(四分位数范围2-26小时)下降到5小时(四分位数范围1-15小时,P = 0.048)。中断时间序列回归显示,干预前后的时间趋势均与零无显著差异;干预后依从性水平变化为8.3 (P = 0.004)。在多变量回归中也观察到LPV的依从性增加(OR, 1.438; P < .001),以及实施后随时间推移的依从性增加趋势(OR, 1.001; P = .004)。在这项研究中,带有Vt警报的实时呼吸机管理仪表板被证明可以显著提高医院对LPV的依从性,并能更快地纠正不理想的呼吸机设置。实施与LPV依从性的增加相关,并持续了15个月的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书