Metaheuristic-optimized neural networks for travel time index prediction: A comparative study of wild horse and coot optimization algorithms

Q1 Engineering
Transportation Engineering Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.treng.2025.100395
Navid Khorshidi , Soheil Rezashoar , Pegah Amini , Shahriar Afandizadeh Zargari , Hamid Mirzahossein
{"title":"Metaheuristic-optimized neural networks for travel time index prediction: A comparative study of wild horse and coot optimization algorithms","authors":"Navid Khorshidi ,&nbsp;Soheil Rezashoar ,&nbsp;Pegah Amini ,&nbsp;Shahriar Afandizadeh Zargari ,&nbsp;Hamid Mirzahossein","doi":"10.1016/j.treng.2025.100395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate travel time prediction is essential for effective Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSs). Unlike traditional gradient-based methods, which may get trapped in local optima, metaheuristic algorithms efficiently navigate complex optimization landscapes without needing derivative computations. This study compares two metaheuristic algorithms—Wild Horse Optimization (WHO) and Coot Optimization Algorithm (COA)—for optimizing the weights and biases of a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network to predict the Travel Time Index (TTI). The MLP uses four input variables (traffic volume, weather, crash rate, and section length), one hidden layer with 12 neurons, and one output neuron. The model was trained and tested on a dataset of 472 observations from Virginia’s transportation network (2014–2017), with input variables showing mean values of 1.19 (traffic volume), 6.92 mm (precipitation), 0.17 (crash rate), and 2.76 miles (section length), and standard deviations of 0.20, 5.21, 0.12, and 1.64, respectively. Performance was assessed using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Correlation Coefficient (R). The WHO-optimized model outperformed COA, achieving an MSE of 0.0026, RMSE of 0.0511, and R of 0.7516, compared to COA’s MSE of 0.0028, RMSE of 0.0533, and R of 0.7262. WHO also showed better computational efficiency (147 s vs. 160 s for COA). These results highlight the WHO-MLP model’s superior accuracy and speed, making it ideal for real-time navigation systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34480,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Engineering","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X25000946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate travel time prediction is essential for effective Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSs). Unlike traditional gradient-based methods, which may get trapped in local optima, metaheuristic algorithms efficiently navigate complex optimization landscapes without needing derivative computations. This study compares two metaheuristic algorithms—Wild Horse Optimization (WHO) and Coot Optimization Algorithm (COA)—for optimizing the weights and biases of a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network to predict the Travel Time Index (TTI). The MLP uses four input variables (traffic volume, weather, crash rate, and section length), one hidden layer with 12 neurons, and one output neuron. The model was trained and tested on a dataset of 472 observations from Virginia’s transportation network (2014–2017), with input variables showing mean values of 1.19 (traffic volume), 6.92 mm (precipitation), 0.17 (crash rate), and 2.76 miles (section length), and standard deviations of 0.20, 5.21, 0.12, and 1.64, respectively. Performance was assessed using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Correlation Coefficient (R). The WHO-optimized model outperformed COA, achieving an MSE of 0.0026, RMSE of 0.0511, and R of 0.7516, compared to COA’s MSE of 0.0028, RMSE of 0.0533, and R of 0.7262. WHO also showed better computational efficiency (147 s vs. 160 s for COA). These results highlight the WHO-MLP model’s superior accuracy and speed, making it ideal for real-time navigation systems.
用于旅行时间指数预测的元启发式优化神经网络:野马优化算法与库特优化算法的比较研究
准确的出行时间预测是智能交通系统有效运行的基础。传统的基于梯度的方法可能会陷入局部最优,而元启发式算法不需要导数计算,可以有效地导航复杂的优化景观。本研究比较了两种元启发式算法——野马优化算法(WHO)和库特优化算法(COA)——用于优化多层感知器(MLP)神经网络的权重和偏差,以预测旅行时间指数(TTI)。MLP使用四个输入变量(交通量、天气、崩溃率和路段长度)、一个包含12个神经元的隐藏层和一个输出神经元。该模型在弗吉尼亚州交通网络(2014-2017年)的472个观测数据集上进行了训练和测试,输入变量的平均值分别为1.19(交通量)、6.92毫米(降雨量)、0.17(碰撞率)和2.76英里(路段长度),标准差分别为0.20、5.21、0.12和1.64。使用均方误差(MSE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和相关系数(R)评估性能。who优化模型优于COA, MSE为0.0026,RMSE为0.0511,R为0.7516,而COA的MSE为0.0028,RMSE为0.0533,R为0.7262。WHO也显示出更好的计算效率(147秒vs. 160秒)。这些结果突出了WHO-MLP模型卓越的准确性和速度,使其成为实时导航系统的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书