Impact of isCGM on quality of life in overweight individuals with impaired glucose tolerance or mild diabetes: secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled study.
{"title":"Impact of isCGM on quality of life in overweight individuals with impaired glucose tolerance or mild diabetes: secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled study.","authors":"Seiji Nishikage, Yushi Hirota, Yasushi Nakagawa, Mei Nakatsuji, Shuichiro Saito, Kai Yoshimura, Mariko Ueda, Akane Yamamoto, Tomofumi Takayoshi, Atsuko Matsuoka, Michiko Takahashi, Akihiko Takeda, Kazuki Yokota, Tomoaki Nakamura, Kazuhiko Sakaguchi, Wataru Ogawa","doi":"10.1007/s13340-025-00838-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) on quality of life (QoL) for overweight individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or mild type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≤ 7.0%) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis of our pilot weight-loss RCT, 40 overweight individuals (BMI, ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomized to isCGM (isCGM plus diet-and-exercise therapy) or control (diet-and-exercise therapy alone) groups. QoL was assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire over a 6-month intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusion of participants with missing data or who withdrew consent, 17 individuals in the isCGM group (median [interquartile range] age, 51.0 [47.0-62.5] years; BMI, 35.0 [32.2-39.0] kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and 16 individuals in the control group (age, 51.0 [41.8-65.0] years; BMI, 29.4 [25.3-35.8] kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were analyzed. No significant differences in QoL changes over the intervention period were observed between the two groups. Within the isCGM group, the Mental Component Summary (MCS) score improved significantly (from 44.8 to 48.4, <i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas the Role/Social Component Summary score declined significantly (from 52.2 to 44.8, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Scan frequency correlated positively with baseline Vitality, Mental Health, and MCS scores. Changes in time above range and standard deviation for sensor glucose were negatively correlated with changes in the General Health score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>isCGM did not improve QoL scores relative to the control group for overweight individuals with IGT or mild diabetes. Within-group analysis suggested that isCGM improved mental QoL but lowered perceived social QoL. Tailored support addressing psychological and social needs may maximise isCGM benefits.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-025-00838-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":11340,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology International","volume":"16 4","pages":"707-716"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12532515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-025-00838-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The impact of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) on quality of life (QoL) for overweight individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or mild type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≤ 7.0%) remains unclear.
Methods: In this secondary analysis of our pilot weight-loss RCT, 40 overweight individuals (BMI, ≥ 25 kg/m2) were randomized to isCGM (isCGM plus diet-and-exercise therapy) or control (diet-and-exercise therapy alone) groups. QoL was assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire over a 6-month intervention.
Results: After exclusion of participants with missing data or who withdrew consent, 17 individuals in the isCGM group (median [interquartile range] age, 51.0 [47.0-62.5] years; BMI, 35.0 [32.2-39.0] kg/m2) and 16 individuals in the control group (age, 51.0 [41.8-65.0] years; BMI, 29.4 [25.3-35.8] kg/m2) were analyzed. No significant differences in QoL changes over the intervention period were observed between the two groups. Within the isCGM group, the Mental Component Summary (MCS) score improved significantly (from 44.8 to 48.4, P < 0.05), whereas the Role/Social Component Summary score declined significantly (from 52.2 to 44.8, P < 0.05). Scan frequency correlated positively with baseline Vitality, Mental Health, and MCS scores. Changes in time above range and standard deviation for sensor glucose were negatively correlated with changes in the General Health score.
Conclusion: isCGM did not improve QoL scores relative to the control group for overweight individuals with IGT or mild diabetes. Within-group analysis suggested that isCGM improved mental QoL but lowered perceived social QoL. Tailored support addressing psychological and social needs may maximise isCGM benefits.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-025-00838-6.
期刊介绍:
Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, publishes original research articles about experimental research and clinical studies in diabetes and related areas. The journal also presents editorials, reviews, commentaries, reports of expert committees, and case reports on any aspect of diabetes. Diabetology International welcomes submissions from researchers, clinicians, and health professionals throughout the world who are interested in research, treatment, and care of patients with diabetes. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed to assure that high-quality information in the field of diabetes is made available to readers. Manuscripts are reviewed with due respect for the author''s confidentiality. At the same time, reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which are respected by the editors. The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.