Efficacy of chemotherapy with G-CSF versus plerixafor with G-CSF in autologous stem cell mobilization for lymphoma patients.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/XSXL9602
Jin Zhao, Xiaolian Wen, Li Ma, Xiaojing Guo, Liping Su
{"title":"Efficacy of chemotherapy with G-CSF versus plerixafor with G-CSF in autologous stem cell mobilization for lymphoma patients.","authors":"Jin Zhao, Xiaolian Wen, Li Ma, Xiaojing Guo, Liping Su","doi":"10.62347/XSXL9602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the efficacy, safety, hematological recovery, immune reconstitution, infection rates, and quality of life (QoL) between two stem cell mobilization regimens - granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus chemotherapy versus G-CSF plus plerixafor - in patients with lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 174 lymphoma patients who underwent stem cell transplantation at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital from 2010 to 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts: G-CSF plus chemotherapy (n=129) and G-CSF plus plerixafor (n=45). Baseline demographics, CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency, time to hematopoietic recovery, transfusion requirements, incidence of fever and infections, hematologic abnormalities, immune reconstitution, and patient-reported QoL at 6 months were collected from de-identified medical records and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The G-CSF plus plerixafor group demonstrated significantly higher CD34+ cell counts at the first apheresis, higher total CD34+ cell yields, and a larger proportion of patients achieving ≥ 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> and ≥ 5 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34+ cells/kg within 4 days compared with the G-CSF plus chemotherapy group. Hematological recovery (platelet and neutrophil engraftment) was faster in the plerixafor group. The plerixafor group also had shorter hospital stays, fewer febrile episodes during neutropenia, reduced antibiotic use, and higher lymphocyte counts at day 28 post-transplantion. The incidences of leukopenia, lymphopenia, anemia, and gastrointestinal adverse effects were lower in this group. Immune reconstitution, particularly CD4+ and CD8+ T cell recovery at 30 days, was improved post-transplant, and QoL scores at 6 months post-discharge were higher across physical, emotional, and social domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mobilization with G-CSF plus plerixafor is associated with higher CD34+ cell yields, faster hematologic and immune recovery, lower complication rates, and better QoL outcomes compared with G-CSF plus chemotherapy in lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 9","pages":"4165-4181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12531286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/XSXL9602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To compare the efficacy, safety, hematological recovery, immune reconstitution, infection rates, and quality of life (QoL) between two stem cell mobilization regimens - granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus chemotherapy versus G-CSF plus plerixafor - in patients with lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 174 lymphoma patients who underwent stem cell transplantation at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital from 2010 to 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts: G-CSF plus chemotherapy (n=129) and G-CSF plus plerixafor (n=45). Baseline demographics, CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency, time to hematopoietic recovery, transfusion requirements, incidence of fever and infections, hematologic abnormalities, immune reconstitution, and patient-reported QoL at 6 months were collected from de-identified medical records and analyzed.

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The G-CSF plus plerixafor group demonstrated significantly higher CD34+ cell counts at the first apheresis, higher total CD34+ cell yields, and a larger proportion of patients achieving ≥ 2 × 106 and ≥ 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg within 4 days compared with the G-CSF plus chemotherapy group. Hematological recovery (platelet and neutrophil engraftment) was faster in the plerixafor group. The plerixafor group also had shorter hospital stays, fewer febrile episodes during neutropenia, reduced antibiotic use, and higher lymphocyte counts at day 28 post-transplantion. The incidences of leukopenia, lymphopenia, anemia, and gastrointestinal adverse effects were lower in this group. Immune reconstitution, particularly CD4+ and CD8+ T cell recovery at 30 days, was improved post-transplant, and QoL scores at 6 months post-discharge were higher across physical, emotional, and social domains.

Conclusion: Mobilization with G-CSF plus plerixafor is associated with higher CD34+ cell yields, faster hematologic and immune recovery, lower complication rates, and better QoL outcomes compared with G-CSF plus chemotherapy in lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT.

G-CSF化疗与G-CSF普立沙替在淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞动员中的疗效比较。
目的:比较两种干细胞动员方案——粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)加化疗与G-CSF加普利沙福在淋巴瘤自体干细胞移植(ASCT)患者中的疗效、安全性、血液学恢复、免疫重建、感染率和生活质量(QoL)。方法:对2010年至2024年在山西省肿瘤医院行干细胞移植的174例淋巴瘤患者进行回顾性队列研究。患者被分为两组:G-CSF联合化疗组(n=129)和G-CSF联合普利沙福组(n=45)。从去识别的医疗记录中收集基线人口统计数据、CD34+细胞产量和收集效率、造血恢复时间、输血需求、发热和感染发生率、血液学异常、免疫重建和患者报告的6个月生活质量并进行分析。结果:两组间基线特征具有可比性。与G-CSF +化疗组相比,G-CSF + plerixafor组在第一次采珠时CD34+细胞计数显著增加,CD34+细胞总产量更高,4天内CD34+细胞/kg≥2 × 106和≥5 × 106的患者比例更高。血液学恢复(血小板和中性粒细胞植入)在普利沙弗组更快。plerixafor组住院时间更短,中性粒细胞减少时发热发作更少,抗生素使用减少,移植后第28天淋巴细胞计数更高。白细胞减少、淋巴细胞减少、贫血和胃肠道不良反应的发生率在该组较低。移植后的免疫重建,特别是30天的CD4+和CD8+ T细胞恢复,得到了改善,出院后6个月的生活质量评分在身体、情感和社会领域都更高。结论:在接受ASCT的淋巴瘤患者中,与G-CSF联合化疗相比,G-CSF联合plerixafor与更高的CD34+细胞产量、更快的血液学和免疫恢复、更低的并发症发生率和更好的生活质量相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信