A comparative genomic analysis of left- and right-sided colon cancer using real-world data from the AACR project GENIE BPC dataset.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/JOGM1897
Younggwang Kim, Min Ki Kim, Sanghun Lee
{"title":"A comparative genomic analysis of left- and right-sided colon cancer using real-world data from the AACR project GENIE BPC dataset.","authors":"Younggwang Kim, Min Ki Kim, Sanghun Lee","doi":"10.62347/JOGM1897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left- and Right-sided colon cancers (LCC and RCC) are increasingly recognized as distinct clinicopathological and molecular subtypes with divergent prognoses and therapeutic responses. Leveraging a large, multi-institutional cohort from the AACR Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) (n = 750; LCC: 363 vs. RCC: 387), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of mutational profiles, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and survival outcomes. Our findings revealed a markedly higher TMB in RCC compared to LCC (6.65 ± 11.3 vs. 3.17 ± 4.35; adjusted <i>P</i> = 3.12×10<sup>-32</sup>), suggesting greater genomic instability in RCC. After applying functional annotation filters (PolyPhen > 0.85, SIFT < 0.05), RCC tumors were significantly enriched for mutations in <i>BRAF</i> (23.1% vs. 6.7%), <i>KMT2D</i> (8.6% vs. 3.2%), and <i>SMAD4</i> (13.1% vs. 7.3%), while <i>TP53</i> mutations predominated in LCC (40.6% vs. 31.8%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified RCC as an independent predictor of poorer overall survival (OS) relative to LCC (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.02-1.66, <i>P</i> = 0.033). Notably, <i>KRAS</i> mutations were associated with significantly worse OS in LCC (HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.06-2.70, <i>P</i> = 0.027), while <i>BRAF</i> mutations predicted adverse outcomes in RCC (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.05-2.37, <i>P</i> = 0.028). These results underscore the prognostic value of tumor sidedness and specific genetic alterations in colon adenocarcinoma. Our study highlights the need for sidedness-specific molecular profiling to inform precision oncology strategies in colon cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 9","pages":"4182-4194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12531274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/JOGM1897","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left- and Right-sided colon cancers (LCC and RCC) are increasingly recognized as distinct clinicopathological and molecular subtypes with divergent prognoses and therapeutic responses. Leveraging a large, multi-institutional cohort from the AACR Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) (n = 750; LCC: 363 vs. RCC: 387), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of mutational profiles, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and survival outcomes. Our findings revealed a markedly higher TMB in RCC compared to LCC (6.65 ± 11.3 vs. 3.17 ± 4.35; adjusted P = 3.12×10-32), suggesting greater genomic instability in RCC. After applying functional annotation filters (PolyPhen > 0.85, SIFT < 0.05), RCC tumors were significantly enriched for mutations in BRAF (23.1% vs. 6.7%), KMT2D (8.6% vs. 3.2%), and SMAD4 (13.1% vs. 7.3%), while TP53 mutations predominated in LCC (40.6% vs. 31.8%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified RCC as an independent predictor of poorer overall survival (OS) relative to LCC (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.02-1.66, P = 0.033). Notably, KRAS mutations were associated with significantly worse OS in LCC (HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.06-2.70, P = 0.027), while BRAF mutations predicted adverse outcomes in RCC (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.05-2.37, P = 0.028). These results underscore the prognostic value of tumor sidedness and specific genetic alterations in colon adenocarcinoma. Our study highlights the need for sidedness-specific molecular profiling to inform precision oncology strategies in colon cancer management.

使用来自AACR项目GENIE BPC数据集的真实数据对左侧和右侧结肠癌进行比较基因组分析。
左侧和右侧结肠癌(LCC和RCC)越来越被认为是不同的临床病理和分子亚型,具有不同的预后和治疗反应。利用来自AACR项目基因组学证据肿瘤信息交换(GENIE)生物制药协作(BPC)的大型多机构队列(n = 750; LCC: 363 vs RCC: 387),我们对突变谱、肿瘤突变负担(TMB)和生存结果进行了全面分析。我们的研究结果显示,与LCC相比,RCC的TMB明显更高(6.65±11.3比3.17±4.35;校正P = 3.12×10-32),表明RCC的基因组不稳定性更高。应用功能注释过滤器(PolyPhen > 0.85, SIFT < 0.05)后,RCC肿瘤中BRAF(23.1%比6.7%)、KMT2D(8.6%比3.2%)和SMAD4(13.1%比7.3%)突变显著富集,而TP53突变在LCC中占主导地位(40.6%比31.8%)。多因素Cox回归分析发现,RCC是相对于LCC较差的总生存期(OS)的独立预测因子(HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.02-1.66, P = 0.033)。值得注意的是,KRAS突变与LCC中较差的OS显著相关(HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.06-2.70, P = 0.027),而BRAF突变预测RCC的不良结局(HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.05-2.37, P = 0.028)。这些结果强调了肿瘤侧边性和特异性基因改变在结肠腺癌中的预后价值。我们的研究强调了侧边特异性分子谱分析的必要性,以告知结肠癌管理中的精确肿瘤学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信