Baseline HbA1c and dementia risk at SGLT2i initiation in type 2 diabetes.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jiaqiang Zhang, Yangyang Wang, Zhongyuan Lu, Yitian Yang, Jiao Wang, Liang Zhao, Fangfang Li, Mengrong Miao, Wan-Ming Chen, Szu-Yuan Wu, Mingyang Sun
{"title":"Baseline HbA1c and dementia risk at SGLT2i initiation in type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Jiaqiang Zhang, Yangyang Wang, Zhongyuan Lu, Yitian Yang, Jiao Wang, Liang Zhao, Fangfang Li, Mengrong Miao, Wan-Ming Chen, Szu-Yuan Wu, Mingyang Sun","doi":"10.1111/dom.70223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a major modifiable risk factor for dementia, yet the optimal timing of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) initiation for cognitive protection remains unclear. HbA1c is routinely measured, but its role in predicting dementia risk at the time of SGLT2i initiation is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Global Collaborative Network (>150 health systems worldwide). Adults with T2DM initiating SGLT2i between 2005 and 2025 were included, applying a 456-day washout to reduce protopathic and immortal time bias. Patients were stratified by baseline HbA1c (<7.0%, 7.0%-8.9%, ≥9.0%) and matched 1:1 by propensity scores for demographics, comorbidities, medications and utilization. The primary outcome was incident all-cause dementia; secondary endpoints included dementia subtypes, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse kidney events (MAKE) and osteoporotic fracture as a negative control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among matched cohorts (median follow-up 4.2 years), dementia risk increased with higher HbA1c: HR 1.32 (7.0%-8.9%) and HR 1.68 (≥9.0%) versus <7.0%. These associations were consistent but attenuated in propensity-score-matched models (HR 1.08 and 1.28). Associations were strongest for vascular dementia and consistent across sensitivity analyses and cause-specific competing-risk Cox models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline HbA1c at SGLT2i initiation predicts dementia risk. Delaying therapy until HbA1c ≥9% may forfeit protection, whereas earlier use may safeguard brain, heart and kidney health.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a major modifiable risk factor for dementia, yet the optimal timing of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) initiation for cognitive protection remains unclear. HbA1c is routinely measured, but its role in predicting dementia risk at the time of SGLT2i initiation is unknown.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Global Collaborative Network (>150 health systems worldwide). Adults with T2DM initiating SGLT2i between 2005 and 2025 were included, applying a 456-day washout to reduce protopathic and immortal time bias. Patients were stratified by baseline HbA1c (<7.0%, 7.0%-8.9%, ≥9.0%) and matched 1:1 by propensity scores for demographics, comorbidities, medications and utilization. The primary outcome was incident all-cause dementia; secondary endpoints included dementia subtypes, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse kidney events (MAKE) and osteoporotic fracture as a negative control.

Results: Among matched cohorts (median follow-up 4.2 years), dementia risk increased with higher HbA1c: HR 1.32 (7.0%-8.9%) and HR 1.68 (≥9.0%) versus <7.0%. These associations were consistent but attenuated in propensity-score-matched models (HR 1.08 and 1.28). Associations were strongest for vascular dementia and consistent across sensitivity analyses and cause-specific competing-risk Cox models.

Conclusions: Baseline HbA1c at SGLT2i initiation predicts dementia risk. Delaying therapy until HbA1c ≥9% may forfeit protection, whereas earlier use may safeguard brain, heart and kidney health.

2型糖尿病SGLT2i起始时的基线HbA1c和痴呆风险。
目的:2型糖尿病(T2DM)是痴呆的一个主要可改变的危险因素,然而钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)启动认知保护的最佳时机仍不清楚。HbA1c是常规测量,但其在SGLT2i开始时预测痴呆风险的作用尚不清楚。方法:我们利用全球协作网络(全球150个卫生系统)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究纳入了2005年至2025年间开始SGLT2i的成人T2DM患者,采用456天的洗脱期来减少原发病变和不朽时间偏差。根据基线HbA1c对患者进行分层(结果:在匹配的队列中(中位随访4.2年),随着HbA1c升高,痴呆风险增加:HR为1.32 (7.0%-8.9%),HR为1.68(≥9.0%),而结论:SGLT2i起始时基线HbA1c可预测痴呆风险。延迟治疗至HbA1c≥9%可能丧失保护作用,而早期使用可保护大脑、心脏和肾脏健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信