Probabilistic assessment and automatic detection of oscillations in industrial control loops

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
An-qi Guan , Fang-na Xiang , Ling-feng Hang , Zhi-yan Li , Zhen-hao Lin , Zhi-jiang Jin , Jin-yuan Qian
{"title":"Probabilistic assessment and automatic detection of oscillations in industrial control loops","authors":"An-qi Guan ,&nbsp;Fang-na Xiang ,&nbsp;Ling-feng Hang ,&nbsp;Zhi-yan Li ,&nbsp;Zhen-hao Lin ,&nbsp;Zhi-jiang Jin ,&nbsp;Jin-yuan Qian","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loop oscillation is a prevalent issue in industrial control loops. Affected by changes in production tasks, loop load, and external environment, industrial control systems typically have more complex oscillation patterns. Industrial signals often exhibit multimodal superposition, noise interference, and non-stationarity. Binary judgment of oscillation is prone to false alarms or missed detections in industrial control loops. More fundamentally, the binary classification framework fails to quantify oscillation risks. Therefore, complex oscillations in industrial control loops still need a more flexible assessment framework. In this paper, a probabilistic assessment framework for oscillations is proposed from the perspective of the statistical characteristics of zero-crossings. To enhance the reliability of signal preprocessing, adaptive VMD and significant IMFs identification are combined. By incorporating the statistical characteristics for coefficient of variation into regularity test of oscillation, the conventional binary classification is transformed into the probabilistic assessment. In simulation studies, the effectiveness of adaptive VMD, significant IMFs identification, and probabilistic assessment in complex signals and negative feedback loops is verified through three examples. In industrial scenario studies, the performance of the proposed method is analyzed in 93 benchmark industrial loops. The proposed method is compared with 12 distinct methods. The detection results of benchmark industrial loops show that the performance of this method is superior to most detection methods. The proposed method can not only ensure high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, but also evaluate and grade the oscillation probability without historical data and model training. This detection method provides reference value for risk classification and decision optimization of process monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":286,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 109437"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425004405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loop oscillation is a prevalent issue in industrial control loops. Affected by changes in production tasks, loop load, and external environment, industrial control systems typically have more complex oscillation patterns. Industrial signals often exhibit multimodal superposition, noise interference, and non-stationarity. Binary judgment of oscillation is prone to false alarms or missed detections in industrial control loops. More fundamentally, the binary classification framework fails to quantify oscillation risks. Therefore, complex oscillations in industrial control loops still need a more flexible assessment framework. In this paper, a probabilistic assessment framework for oscillations is proposed from the perspective of the statistical characteristics of zero-crossings. To enhance the reliability of signal preprocessing, adaptive VMD and significant IMFs identification are combined. By incorporating the statistical characteristics for coefficient of variation into regularity test of oscillation, the conventional binary classification is transformed into the probabilistic assessment. In simulation studies, the effectiveness of adaptive VMD, significant IMFs identification, and probabilistic assessment in complex signals and negative feedback loops is verified through three examples. In industrial scenario studies, the performance of the proposed method is analyzed in 93 benchmark industrial loops. The proposed method is compared with 12 distinct methods. The detection results of benchmark industrial loops show that the performance of this method is superior to most detection methods. The proposed method can not only ensure high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, but also evaluate and grade the oscillation probability without historical data and model training. This detection method provides reference value for risk classification and decision optimization of process monitoring.
工业控制回路振荡的概率评估与自动检测
回路振荡是工业控制回路中一个普遍存在的问题。受生产任务、回路负载和外部环境变化的影响,工业控制系统通常具有更复杂的振荡模式。工业信号通常表现为多模态叠加、噪声干扰和非平稳性。在工业控制回路中,振荡的二值判断容易产生虚警或漏检。更根本的是,二元分类框架无法量化振荡风险。因此,工业控制回路中的复杂振荡仍然需要一个更灵活的评估框架。本文从过零的统计特性出发,提出了振荡的概率评估框架。为了提高信号预处理的可靠性,将自适应VMD和显著性IMFs识别相结合。通过将变异系数的统计特征引入振荡的规律性检验,将传统的二值分类转化为概率评估。在仿真研究中,通过三个算例验证了自适应VMD、显著IMFs识别和概率评估在复杂信号和负反馈回路中的有效性。在工业场景研究中,对该方法在93个基准工业回路中的性能进行了分析。并与12种不同的方法进行了比较。基准工业回路的检测结果表明,该方法的性能优于大多数检测方法。该方法不仅具有较高的准确性、灵敏度和特异性,而且在不需要历史数据和模型训练的情况下,可以对振荡概率进行评估和分级。该检测方法对过程监控的风险分类和决策优化具有参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Computers & Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Chemical Engineering is primarily a journal of record for new developments in the application of computing and systems technology to chemical engineering problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信