Mesoscale and macroscale modelling for nonlinear analysis of masonry wall structures under cyclic loading

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Luca Bomben , Lorenzo Macorini , Corrado Chisari , Bassam A. Izzuddin
{"title":"Mesoscale and macroscale modelling for nonlinear analysis of masonry wall structures under cyclic loading","authors":"Luca Bomben ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Macorini ,&nbsp;Corrado Chisari ,&nbsp;Bassam A. Izzuddin","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paper investigates the nonlinear response of unreinforced masonry wall components under seismic loading. Finite element models formulated according to different scales of representation for masonry are compared, focusing on the hysteretic behaviour under in-plane cyclic loading up to collapse. To this aim, brick-masonry wall structures, including two panels with different aspect ratios and a large two-storey perforated wall, as well as block-masonry wall panels subjected to various vertical loads, all previously tested under horizontal cyclic loading, are analysed. The results of macro and mesoscale simulations are compared against the experimental findings to assess the ability to represent strength and stiffness degradation and the amount of dissipated energy. Emphasis is laid upon the objectivity of the definition and calibration of the model material parameters to assess how their selection affects the response predictions. The comparison highlights differences in predictive accuracy, numerical robustness, variability of results, and computational cost. The results show that the macroscale approach adopted herein, despite its computational robustness, yields widely variable results and may significantly deviate from experimental observations. In contrast, the mesoscale results appear less scattered and accurate, but the computational burden is far more significant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 110209"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425020247","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper investigates the nonlinear response of unreinforced masonry wall components under seismic loading. Finite element models formulated according to different scales of representation for masonry are compared, focusing on the hysteretic behaviour under in-plane cyclic loading up to collapse. To this aim, brick-masonry wall structures, including two panels with different aspect ratios and a large two-storey perforated wall, as well as block-masonry wall panels subjected to various vertical loads, all previously tested under horizontal cyclic loading, are analysed. The results of macro and mesoscale simulations are compared against the experimental findings to assess the ability to represent strength and stiffness degradation and the amount of dissipated energy. Emphasis is laid upon the objectivity of the definition and calibration of the model material parameters to assess how their selection affects the response predictions. The comparison highlights differences in predictive accuracy, numerical robustness, variability of results, and computational cost. The results show that the macroscale approach adopted herein, despite its computational robustness, yields widely variable results and may significantly deviate from experimental observations. In contrast, the mesoscale results appear less scattered and accurate, but the computational burden is far more significant.
循环荷载作用下砌体墙体结构非线性分析的中尺度和宏观模型
研究了地震荷载作用下无加筋砌体墙体构件的非线性响应。本文比较了不同表示尺度下的砌体有限元模型,重点研究了砌体在面内循环荷载作用下直至倒塌的滞回特性。为此,砖砌体墙结构,包括两个不同宽高比的面板和一个大的两层穿孔墙,以及受到各种垂直荷载的块砌体墙面板,所有之前在水平循环荷载下进行的测试,都进行了分析。将宏观和中尺度模拟的结果与实验结果进行比较,以评估表征强度和刚度退化以及耗散能量的能力。重点放在模型材料参数的定义和校准的客观性上,以评估它们的选择如何影响响应预测。比较突出了预测精度、数值稳健性、结果可变性和计算成本方面的差异。结果表明,本文采用的宏观尺度方法尽管具有计算鲁棒性,但产生的结果差异很大,可能与实验观察结果存在显著偏差。相比之下,中尺度的结果似乎不那么分散和准确,但计算负担要大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信