Diagnosis of spinal infections caused by fastidious bacteria: a multicenter, retrospective observational study.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Wenqiao Wang, Huafeng Wang, Qiang Zhang, Litao Li, Xiaofeng Lian, Chuqiang Yin, Yuhan Lin, Zhaohui Li, Yuelei Wang, Zengshuai Han, Feng Shen, Xiaotong Chen, Ruifu Sun, Ting Wang
{"title":"Diagnosis of spinal infections caused by fastidious bacteria: a multicenter, retrospective observational study.","authors":"Wenqiao Wang, Huafeng Wang, Qiang Zhang, Litao Li, Xiaofeng Lian, Chuqiang Yin, Yuhan Lin, Zhaohui Li, Yuelei Wang, Zengshuai Han, Feng Shen, Xiaotong Chen, Ruifu Sun, Ting Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.10.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Identifying pathogens in pyogenic spinal infections is essential for guiding clinical treatment. However, the fastidious characteristics of certain bacteria often make traditional microbial culture methods ineffective, resulting in diagnostic delays and postponed intervention. In recent years, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has shown strong potential in analyzing complex microbial communities, offering a more advanced strategy for pathogen detection.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluating mNGS versus microbial culture for diagnosing fastidious bacteria in pyogenic spinal infections.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A multicenter, retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 553 patients diagnosed with spinal infections across four medical centers between December 2019 and December 2024.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Identification of fastidious bacteria in patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients underwent imaging and standard laboratory testing. Specimens from infected sites obtained through puncture or surgery were analyzed using both microbial culture and mNGS. According to predefined diagnostic, inclusion, and exclusion criteria for fastidious bacteria, 49 patients (8.86%, 49/553) were identified with pyogenic spinal infections caused by fastidious organisms. We compared the diagnostic outcomes of mNGS with those of culture-based methods for detecting fastidious bacterial pathogens in spinal infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 49 patients, mNGS yielded a positive detection rate of 87.76% (43/49), which was significantly higher than that of conventional culture methods at 16.33% (8/49) (χ²=12.683, p < 0.001). Among the 41 culture-negative cases, mNGS successfully identified fastidious bacteria in 37, corresponding to an effective supplementary detection rate of 90.24% (37/41). While culture identified 5 species of fastidious bacteria, mNGS detected 15, giving an effective pathogen supplementation rate of 66.7% (10/15). These 15 bacteria fell into two groups: the first included those that cannot be cultured using routine clinical media (26/43, 60.47%), and the second included those that may sporadically grow in standard cultures but tend to show low positivity (17/43, 39.53%). Out of the total 553 cases, 382 were culture-negative. Among these, 37 (37/382, 9.69%) were identified as fastidious bacteria via mNGS. mNGS yielded results within 48 hours, significantly faster than the 3-7 days typically required by culture methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cases of pyogenic spinal infections caused by fastidious bacteria, mNGS demonstrated a higher detection rate, wider pathogen range, and significantly shorter turnaround compared to traditional microbial culture. The culture-independent approach of mNGS presents a distinct advantage in identifying fastidious pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.10.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Identifying pathogens in pyogenic spinal infections is essential for guiding clinical treatment. However, the fastidious characteristics of certain bacteria often make traditional microbial culture methods ineffective, resulting in diagnostic delays and postponed intervention. In recent years, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has shown strong potential in analyzing complex microbial communities, offering a more advanced strategy for pathogen detection.

Purpose: Evaluating mNGS versus microbial culture for diagnosing fastidious bacteria in pyogenic spinal infections.

Study design: A multicenter, retrospective observational study.

Patient sample: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 553 patients diagnosed with spinal infections across four medical centers between December 2019 and December 2024.

Outcome measures: Identification of fastidious bacteria in patients.

Methods: All patients underwent imaging and standard laboratory testing. Specimens from infected sites obtained through puncture or surgery were analyzed using both microbial culture and mNGS. According to predefined diagnostic, inclusion, and exclusion criteria for fastidious bacteria, 49 patients (8.86%, 49/553) were identified with pyogenic spinal infections caused by fastidious organisms. We compared the diagnostic outcomes of mNGS with those of culture-based methods for detecting fastidious bacterial pathogens in spinal infections.

Results: Among the 49 patients, mNGS yielded a positive detection rate of 87.76% (43/49), which was significantly higher than that of conventional culture methods at 16.33% (8/49) (χ²=12.683, p < 0.001). Among the 41 culture-negative cases, mNGS successfully identified fastidious bacteria in 37, corresponding to an effective supplementary detection rate of 90.24% (37/41). While culture identified 5 species of fastidious bacteria, mNGS detected 15, giving an effective pathogen supplementation rate of 66.7% (10/15). These 15 bacteria fell into two groups: the first included those that cannot be cultured using routine clinical media (26/43, 60.47%), and the second included those that may sporadically grow in standard cultures but tend to show low positivity (17/43, 39.53%). Out of the total 553 cases, 382 were culture-negative. Among these, 37 (37/382, 9.69%) were identified as fastidious bacteria via mNGS. mNGS yielded results within 48 hours, significantly faster than the 3-7 days typically required by culture methods.

Conclusions: In cases of pyogenic spinal infections caused by fastidious bacteria, mNGS demonstrated a higher detection rate, wider pathogen range, and significantly shorter turnaround compared to traditional microbial culture. The culture-independent approach of mNGS presents a distinct advantage in identifying fastidious pathogens.

由挑剔细菌引起的脊柱感染的诊断:一项多中心、回顾性观察研究。
背景背景:查明脊柱化脓性感染的病原体对指导临床治疗至关重要。然而,某些细菌的挑剔特性往往使传统的微生物培养方法无效,导致诊断延误和干预推迟。近年来,新一代宏基因组测序(mNGS)在分析复杂微生物群落方面显示出强大的潜力,为病原体检测提供了更先进的策略。目的:评价mNGS与微生物培养在诊断化脓性脊柱感染中挑剔细菌的价值。研究设计:多中心回顾性观察性研究。患者样本:我们回顾性地回顾了2019年12月至2024年12月期间四个医疗中心诊断为脊柱感染的553名患者的临床数据。结果测量:患者中苛求菌的鉴定。方法:所有患者均行影像学检查和标准实验室检查。通过穿刺或手术获得的感染部位标本采用微生物培养和mNGS分析。根据预先设定的挑剔菌诊断、纳入和排除标准,49例(8.86%,49/553)患者被鉴定为由挑剔菌引起的脊柱化脓性感染。我们比较了mNGS的诊断结果与基于培养的方法检测脊柱感染中挑剔的细菌病原体的结果。结果:49例患者中,mNGS法的阳性检出率为87.76%(43/49),显著高于常规培养法的16.33% (8/49)(χ²=12.683,p < 0.001)。在41例培养阴性病例中,mNGS成功检出37例,有效补充检出率为90.24%(37/41)。培养检出5种挑剔菌,mNGS检出15种,有效病原菌补充率为66.7%(10/15)。这15种细菌分为两组:第一类是不能用常规临床培养基培养的细菌(26/43,60.47%);第二类是在标准培养基中偶尔生长但往往呈低阳性的细菌(17/43,39.53%)。在553例病例中,382例培养阴性。其中37株(37/382,9.69%)经mNGS鉴定为挑剔菌。mNGS在48小时内产生结果,明显快于培养方法通常需要的3-7天。结论:在挑剔菌引起的脊柱化脓性感染病例中,与传统微生物培养相比,mNGS具有更高的检出率、更广泛的病原体范围和更短的周期。mNGS的培养独立方法在鉴定挑剔的病原体方面具有明显的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信