Vivian Y. Park , Daniel S. Hippe , Anum S. Kazerouni , Debosmita Biswas , Mary Lynn Bryant , Isabella Li , Sara H. Javid , Mark Kilgore , Janice Kim , Andrew G. Kim , John R. Scheel , Kathryn P. Lowry , Diana L. Lam , Savannah Partridge , Habib Rahbar
{"title":"Multiparametric breast MRI to problem-solve mammographically detected suspicious calcifications","authors":"Vivian Y. Park , Daniel S. Hippe , Anum S. Kazerouni , Debosmita Biswas , Mary Lynn Bryant , Isabella Li , Sara H. Javid , Mark Kilgore , Janice Kim , Andrew G. Kim , John R. Scheel , Kathryn P. Lowry , Diana L. Lam , Savannah Partridge , Habib Rahbar","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of multiparametric breast MRI to problem-solve mammographically-detected suspicious calcifications.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Participants with mammographically-detected suspicious calcifications were prospectively enrolled between August 2017 to May 2023. Pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI (standard and high-temporal resolution dynamic contrast enhanced [DCE]-MRI acquisitions and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) was performed. The associations of MRI features with outcomes – (1) any malignancy and (2) invasive or high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] only – were analyzed using univariable logistic regression. Multivariable models, sequentially incorporating clinical/mammographic, qualitative, and quantitative features, were developed using penalized logistic regression with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were estimated via cross-validation and compared between models using bootstrap methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>81 women (mean age, 55 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) with 86 calcifications were included; 29 % (25/86) were malignant. Malignancy rates for non-enhancing mammographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4a and 4b calcifications were 3.8 % (1/26) and 8.7 % (2/23), respectively, with no invasive cancer or high-grade DCIS. Mammographic BI-RADS category, MRI BI-RADS category, visibility on DWI, peak percent enhancement, functional tumor volume, and K<sup>trans</sup> values were associated with both outcomes (all <em>p</em> < 0.05). Multivariable models, including qualitative DCE-MRI assessments, showed higher AUCs (malignancy: 0.71–0.76; invasive cancer or high-grade DCIS: 0.78–0.91) than when including only clinical and mammographic features (malignancy: 0.57; invasive cancer or high-grade DCIS: 0.61, all <em>p</em> < 0.05). Further incorporation of DWI or quantitative MRI features did not improve AUCs (all ΔAUC ≤ 0).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Breast DCE-MRI aids in evaluating mammographic BI-RADS category 4a/4b calcifications without biopsy. DWI or quantitative MRI features may not further improve diagnostic performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 112467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25005534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the performance of multiparametric breast MRI to problem-solve mammographically-detected suspicious calcifications.
Materials and methods
Participants with mammographically-detected suspicious calcifications were prospectively enrolled between August 2017 to May 2023. Pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI (standard and high-temporal resolution dynamic contrast enhanced [DCE]-MRI acquisitions and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) was performed. The associations of MRI features with outcomes – (1) any malignancy and (2) invasive or high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] only – were analyzed using univariable logistic regression. Multivariable models, sequentially incorporating clinical/mammographic, qualitative, and quantitative features, were developed using penalized logistic regression with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were estimated via cross-validation and compared between models using bootstrap methods.
Results
81 women (mean age, 55 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) with 86 calcifications were included; 29 % (25/86) were malignant. Malignancy rates for non-enhancing mammographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4a and 4b calcifications were 3.8 % (1/26) and 8.7 % (2/23), respectively, with no invasive cancer or high-grade DCIS. Mammographic BI-RADS category, MRI BI-RADS category, visibility on DWI, peak percent enhancement, functional tumor volume, and Ktrans values were associated with both outcomes (all p < 0.05). Multivariable models, including qualitative DCE-MRI assessments, showed higher AUCs (malignancy: 0.71–0.76; invasive cancer or high-grade DCIS: 0.78–0.91) than when including only clinical and mammographic features (malignancy: 0.57; invasive cancer or high-grade DCIS: 0.61, all p < 0.05). Further incorporation of DWI or quantitative MRI features did not improve AUCs (all ΔAUC ≤ 0).
Conclusion
Breast DCE-MRI aids in evaluating mammographic BI-RADS category 4a/4b calcifications without biopsy. DWI or quantitative MRI features may not further improve diagnostic performance.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.