The Process of Undergraduates' Collaboration With a Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: Insights From Conversation Content and Epistemic Network Analysis

IF 4.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Weipeng Shen, Xiao-Fan Lin, Jiachun Liu, Xinxian Liang, Ruiqing Chen, Xiaoyun Lai, Xinwen Zheng
{"title":"The Process of Undergraduates' Collaboration With a Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: Insights From Conversation Content and Epistemic Network Analysis","authors":"Weipeng Shen,&nbsp;Xiao-Fan Lin,&nbsp;Jiachun Liu,&nbsp;Xinxian Liang,&nbsp;Ruiqing Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Lai,&nbsp;Xinwen Zheng","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots extend transformative impact in higher education. Current research requires more comprehensive evaluations of the collaborative learning fostered by students and GenAI chatbots. However, existing articles have rarely explored the dynamic process of student–AI collaboration in higher education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to analyse and visualise the changes in the process of undergraduates' collaboration with a GenAI chatbot. The interaction patterns of the collaboration were explored under the perspective of social constructivist learning theory. The differences between student-AI interaction patterns at 5 time points (after 5 lessons) were further compared to show the dynamic collaboration process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A 9-week course was implemented for 40 Chinese undergraduates, who completed 5 rounds of collaboration with a GenAI chatbot named ERNIE Bot. Employing a designed coding scheme, a total of 6180 codes was collected from the conversation content of each round. Based on the interval data, content analysis and epistemic network analysis (ENA) were conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>First, undergraduates gradually became more active and targeted in their collaboration with the GenAI chatbot. Second, the focal points of their collaboration changed from “Comprehension” (the first–third lessons) to “Generation” (the third–fifth lessons), along with different interaction patterns. Notably, the interaction patterns changed more rapidly and prominently during the “Comprehension” phase than the “Generation” phase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The findings contribute to understanding the social constructivist learning process within student-AI collaboration in higher education. Practical recommendations for students and educators were offered as well.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots extend transformative impact in higher education. Current research requires more comprehensive evaluations of the collaborative learning fostered by students and GenAI chatbots. However, existing articles have rarely explored the dynamic process of student–AI collaboration in higher education.

Objectives

This study aims to analyse and visualise the changes in the process of undergraduates' collaboration with a GenAI chatbot. The interaction patterns of the collaboration were explored under the perspective of social constructivist learning theory. The differences between student-AI interaction patterns at 5 time points (after 5 lessons) were further compared to show the dynamic collaboration process.

Method

A 9-week course was implemented for 40 Chinese undergraduates, who completed 5 rounds of collaboration with a GenAI chatbot named ERNIE Bot. Employing a designed coding scheme, a total of 6180 codes was collected from the conversation content of each round. Based on the interval data, content analysis and epistemic network analysis (ENA) were conducted.

Results

First, undergraduates gradually became more active and targeted in their collaboration with the GenAI chatbot. Second, the focal points of their collaboration changed from “Comprehension” (the first–third lessons) to “Generation” (the third–fifth lessons), along with different interaction patterns. Notably, the interaction patterns changed more rapidly and prominently during the “Comprehension” phase than the “Generation” phase.

Implications

The findings contribute to understanding the social constructivist learning process within student-AI collaboration in higher education. Practical recommendations for students and educators were offered as well.

Abstract Image

大学生与生成式人工智能聊天机器人协作的过程:来自会话内容和认知网络分析的见解
生成式人工智能(GenAI)聊天机器人对高等教育产生了变革性影响。目前的研究需要对学生和GenAI聊天机器人培养的协作学习进行更全面的评估。然而,现有的文章很少探讨高等教育中学生与人工智能合作的动态过程。本研究旨在分析和可视化大学生与GenAI聊天机器人合作过程中的变化。在社会建构主义学习理论的视角下,探讨了合作的互动模式。进一步比较5个时间点(5节课后)学生与人工智能交互模式的差异,展示动态协作过程。方法对40名中国大学生进行为期9周的课程,与GenAI聊天机器人ERNIE Bot完成5轮合作。采用设计的编码方案,从每轮对话内容中共收集6180个编码。基于区间数据,进行了内容分析和认知网络分析(ENA)。首先,大学生在与GenAI聊天机器人的合作中逐渐变得更加活跃和有针对性。二是合作的重点从“理解”(第一节至第三节课)转变为“生成”(第三节至第五节课),互动模式也发生了变化。值得注意的是,交互模式在“理解”阶段比“生成”阶段变化得更快、更显著。研究结果有助于理解高等教育中学生与人工智能合作中的社会建构主义学习过程。报告还为学生和教育工作者提供了实用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信