The Process of Undergraduates' Collaboration With a Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: Insights From Conversation Content and Epistemic Network Analysis
{"title":"The Process of Undergraduates' Collaboration With a Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: Insights From Conversation Content and Epistemic Network Analysis","authors":"Weipeng Shen, Xiao-Fan Lin, Jiachun Liu, Xinxian Liang, Ruiqing Chen, Xiaoyun Lai, Xinwen Zheng","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots extend transformative impact in higher education. Current research requires more comprehensive evaluations of the collaborative learning fostered by students and GenAI chatbots. However, existing articles have rarely explored the dynamic process of student–AI collaboration in higher education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to analyse and visualise the changes in the process of undergraduates' collaboration with a GenAI chatbot. The interaction patterns of the collaboration were explored under the perspective of social constructivist learning theory. The differences between student-AI interaction patterns at 5 time points (after 5 lessons) were further compared to show the dynamic collaboration process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A 9-week course was implemented for 40 Chinese undergraduates, who completed 5 rounds of collaboration with a GenAI chatbot named ERNIE Bot. Employing a designed coding scheme, a total of 6180 codes was collected from the conversation content of each round. Based on the interval data, content analysis and epistemic network analysis (ENA) were conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>First, undergraduates gradually became more active and targeted in their collaboration with the GenAI chatbot. Second, the focal points of their collaboration changed from “Comprehension” (the first–third lessons) to “Generation” (the third–fifth lessons), along with different interaction patterns. Notably, the interaction patterns changed more rapidly and prominently during the “Comprehension” phase than the “Generation” phase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The findings contribute to understanding the social constructivist learning process within student-AI collaboration in higher education. Practical recommendations for students and educators were offered as well.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots extend transformative impact in higher education. Current research requires more comprehensive evaluations of the collaborative learning fostered by students and GenAI chatbots. However, existing articles have rarely explored the dynamic process of student–AI collaboration in higher education.
Objectives
This study aims to analyse and visualise the changes in the process of undergraduates' collaboration with a GenAI chatbot. The interaction patterns of the collaboration were explored under the perspective of social constructivist learning theory. The differences between student-AI interaction patterns at 5 time points (after 5 lessons) were further compared to show the dynamic collaboration process.
Method
A 9-week course was implemented for 40 Chinese undergraduates, who completed 5 rounds of collaboration with a GenAI chatbot named ERNIE Bot. Employing a designed coding scheme, a total of 6180 codes was collected from the conversation content of each round. Based on the interval data, content analysis and epistemic network analysis (ENA) were conducted.
Results
First, undergraduates gradually became more active and targeted in their collaboration with the GenAI chatbot. Second, the focal points of their collaboration changed from “Comprehension” (the first–third lessons) to “Generation” (the third–fifth lessons), along with different interaction patterns. Notably, the interaction patterns changed more rapidly and prominently during the “Comprehension” phase than the “Generation” phase.
Implications
The findings contribute to understanding the social constructivist learning process within student-AI collaboration in higher education. Practical recommendations for students and educators were offered as well.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope