IDC-IMPROVE: protocol for a cluster randomised feasibility trial of a care bundle to improve indwelling catheter care (IDC) in residential aged care homes in Australia.

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Joan Ostaszkiewicz, Andrew Simon Gilbert, Caitlin Tay, Elizabeth Watt, David Barry, Wendy Taylor, Jessica Cecil, Rowan Cockerell, Helen Crowe, Liza Lau, Michael Murray, Sigrid Nakrem, Catherine Paterson, Micah Peters, Ashlyn Sahay, Alyson Sweeney, Janie Thompson, Julie Westaway, Wendy Bower, Juliana Christina, Alan Zana, Frances Batchelor
{"title":"IDC-IMPROVE: protocol for a cluster randomised feasibility trial of a care bundle to improve indwelling catheter care (IDC) in residential aged care homes in Australia.","authors":"Joan Ostaszkiewicz, Andrew Simon Gilbert, Caitlin Tay, Elizabeth Watt, David Barry, Wendy Taylor, Jessica Cecil, Rowan Cockerell, Helen Crowe, Liza Lau, Michael Murray, Sigrid Nakrem, Catherine Paterson, Micah Peters, Ashlyn Sahay, Alyson Sweeney, Janie Thompson, Julie Westaway, Wendy Bower, Juliana Christina, Alan Zana, Frances Batchelor","doi":"10.1186/s40814-025-01700-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indwelling urinary catheters (IDCs) are used by approximately 8% of Australian aged care residents. IDC use is often warranted but entails numerous risks, particularly if used longterm. Risks include catheter-associated urinary tract infections, catheter blockage, catheter leakage, bladder spasm, pain, urethral trauma and haematuria, and increased risk of hospitalisation. The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety identified poor quality, unsafe practices related to IDCs in aged care homes. Enhancing the knowledge, confidence, and skills of aged care staff to deliver catheter care for residents with IDCs is fundamentally important. The IDC-IMPROVE project is supporting aged care providers to meet the care needs of people with IDCs in Australian aged care homes, by designing and validating a suite of resources titled the IDC-IMPROVE Catheter Care Bundle.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to establish the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised control trial to evaluate the effects of the IDC-IMPROVE Catheter Care Bundle in aged care homes in Australia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multi-centre, facility-level clustered randomised control (cRCT) feasibility trial in 24 aged care homes across Victoria, Queensland, and South Australia. Twelve homes will receive the intervention and 12 will continue usual care. The IDC-IMPROVE Catheter Care Bundle intervention comprises principles for person-centred catheter care, online training for nurses and personal care workers, a practical skills workshop for nurses, a toolkit for managers, and an evidence-to-practice support model. The feasibility of the intervention will be assessed through a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, including surveys, interviews, and audits. Feasibility outcomes are: (i) The acceptability of the Bundle, (ii) The fidelity of the implementation, (iii) The compatibility of the Bundle with standard aged care home IDC care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>By enhancing the knowledge, confidence and skills of the aged care workforce, IDCIMPROVE aims to reduce IDC-related complications. This study will provide insights into the acceptability and implementation of the intervention, informing future large-scale trials and potential policy changes.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>The study has been approved by Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (reg: HREC/107165/Austin-2024) and is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (reg: ACTRN12624001178538p).</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12532438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01700-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indwelling urinary catheters (IDCs) are used by approximately 8% of Australian aged care residents. IDC use is often warranted but entails numerous risks, particularly if used longterm. Risks include catheter-associated urinary tract infections, catheter blockage, catheter leakage, bladder spasm, pain, urethral trauma and haematuria, and increased risk of hospitalisation. The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety identified poor quality, unsafe practices related to IDCs in aged care homes. Enhancing the knowledge, confidence, and skills of aged care staff to deliver catheter care for residents with IDCs is fundamentally important. The IDC-IMPROVE project is supporting aged care providers to meet the care needs of people with IDCs in Australian aged care homes, by designing and validating a suite of resources titled the IDC-IMPROVE Catheter Care Bundle.

Aims: This study aims to establish the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised control trial to evaluate the effects of the IDC-IMPROVE Catheter Care Bundle in aged care homes in Australia.

Method: A multi-centre, facility-level clustered randomised control (cRCT) feasibility trial in 24 aged care homes across Victoria, Queensland, and South Australia. Twelve homes will receive the intervention and 12 will continue usual care. The IDC-IMPROVE Catheter Care Bundle intervention comprises principles for person-centred catheter care, online training for nurses and personal care workers, a practical skills workshop for nurses, a toolkit for managers, and an evidence-to-practice support model. The feasibility of the intervention will be assessed through a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, including surveys, interviews, and audits. Feasibility outcomes are: (i) The acceptability of the Bundle, (ii) The fidelity of the implementation, (iii) The compatibility of the Bundle with standard aged care home IDC care.

Discussion: By enhancing the knowledge, confidence and skills of the aged care workforce, IDCIMPROVE aims to reduce IDC-related complications. This study will provide insights into the acceptability and implementation of the intervention, informing future large-scale trials and potential policy changes.

Ethics: The study has been approved by Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (reg: HREC/107165/Austin-2024) and is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (reg: ACTRN12624001178538p).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

IDC- improve:一项针对澳大利亚老年住宅中改善留置导尿管护理(IDC)的护理包的随机可行性试验方案。
背景:留置导尿管(idc)被大约8%的澳大利亚老年护理居民使用。IDC的使用通常是有保证的,但会带来许多风险,特别是如果长期使用的话。风险包括导尿管相关的尿路感染、导尿管堵塞、导尿管泄漏、膀胱痉挛、疼痛、尿道创伤和血尿,以及住院风险增加。老年护理质量和安全皇家委员会确定了与养老院中idc相关的质量差、不安全的做法。提高老年护理人员的知识、信心和技能,为IDCs患者提供导尿管护理是至关重要的。IDC-IMPROVE项目通过设计和验证一套名为IDC-IMPROVE导管护理包的资源,支持老年护理提供者满足澳大利亚老年护理家中idc患者的护理需求。目的:本研究旨在确定进行一项明确的随机对照试验的可行性,以评估IDC-IMPROVE导管护理包在澳大利亚养老院的效果。方法:在维多利亚州、昆士兰州和南澳大利亚州的24家养老院进行多中心、设施级聚类随机对照(cRCT)可行性试验。12个家庭将接受干预,12个家庭将继续接受常规护理。IDC-IMPROVE导管护理一揽子干预措施包括以人为本的导管护理原则、针对护士和个人护理工作者的在线培训、针对护士的实用技能讲习班、针对管理人员的工具包以及一个从证据到实践的支持模型。将通过混合使用定性和定量方法,包括调查、访谈和审计,来评估干预措施的可行性。可行性结果是:(i)捆绑包的可接受性,(ii)实施的保真度,(iii)捆绑包与标准养老院IDC护理的兼容性。讨论:通过提高老年护理人员的知识、信心和技能,IDCIMPROVE旨在减少与老年护理相关的并发症。这项研究将为干预的可接受性和实施提供见解,为未来的大规模试验和潜在的政策变化提供信息。伦理:该研究已获得奥斯汀健康人类研究伦理委员会(注册号:HREC/107165/Austin-2024)的批准,并已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验登记处注册(注册号:ACTRN12624001178538p)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信