6 Minute pegboard and ring test performance of patients with breast cancer compared to healthy controls: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hacer Oncu, Naciye Vardar-Yagli, Melda Saglam, Sercan Aksoy, Ebru Calik
{"title":"6 Minute pegboard and ring test performance of patients with breast cancer compared to healthy controls: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Hacer Oncu, Naciye Vardar-Yagli, Melda Saglam, Sercan Aksoy, Ebru Calik","doi":"10.1177/10538127251388059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeUpper limb dysfunction and inability to carry out everyday tasks are important consequences of disease process in breast cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to compare upper extremity functional exercise capacity and arm functionality between patients with breast cancer and healthy controls.MethodsNinety individuals participated in this analytical cross-sectional study. The study included 45 patients with breast cancer (mean age = 56.69 ± 9.37 years) and 45 healthy controls (mean age = 54.71 ± 6.54 years). The unsupported functional arm exercise capacity was evaluated using the 6-min Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT). The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH) was used for arm functions.ResultsThe 6PBRT score of patients with breast cancer was significantly lower than those of healthy controls with medium effect size (194.16 ± 34.91 rings and 218.87 ± 43.87 rings, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.004, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.065). The mean Q-DASH score of the patients was 22.12 ± 15.70. According to the Q-DASH score, 35.6% (<i>n</i> = 16) of the participants' arm functions were classified as normal, 51.1% (<i>n</i> = 23) having problems but working, and 13.3% (<i>n</i> = 6) being unable to work. There was a significant moderate negative correlation between 6PBRT performance and Q-DASH score in patients' with breast cancer (<i>r</i> = -0.453, <i>p</i> = 0.002).ConclusionUpper extremity exercise capacity and functionality are negatively affected in breast cancer survivors. Therefore, cardio-oncological rehabilitation approaches should incorporate arm aerobic exercise training to improve arm functionality during long-term follow-up after breast cancer medical treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"706-715"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251388059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeUpper limb dysfunction and inability to carry out everyday tasks are important consequences of disease process in breast cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to compare upper extremity functional exercise capacity and arm functionality between patients with breast cancer and healthy controls.MethodsNinety individuals participated in this analytical cross-sectional study. The study included 45 patients with breast cancer (mean age = 56.69 ± 9.37 years) and 45 healthy controls (mean age = 54.71 ± 6.54 years). The unsupported functional arm exercise capacity was evaluated using the 6-min Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT). The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH) was used for arm functions.ResultsThe 6PBRT score of patients with breast cancer was significantly lower than those of healthy controls with medium effect size (194.16 ± 34.91 rings and 218.87 ± 43.87 rings, respectively; p = 0.004, η2 = 0.065). The mean Q-DASH score of the patients was 22.12 ± 15.70. According to the Q-DASH score, 35.6% (n = 16) of the participants' arm functions were classified as normal, 51.1% (n = 23) having problems but working, and 13.3% (n = 6) being unable to work. There was a significant moderate negative correlation between 6PBRT performance and Q-DASH score in patients' with breast cancer (r = -0.453, p = 0.002).ConclusionUpper extremity exercise capacity and functionality are negatively affected in breast cancer survivors. Therefore, cardio-oncological rehabilitation approaches should incorporate arm aerobic exercise training to improve arm functionality during long-term follow-up after breast cancer medical treatments.

与健康对照组相比,乳腺癌患者的分钟钉板和环测试表现:一项横断面研究。
目的:上肢功能障碍和无法进行日常活动是乳腺癌幸存者疾病进程的重要后果。本研究的目的是比较乳腺癌患者和健康对照者的上肢功能运动能力和手臂功能。方法90例个体参与本分析性横断面研究。本研究纳入45例乳腺癌患者(平均年龄56.69±9.37岁)和45例健康对照(平均年龄54.71±6.54岁)。使用6分钟钉板环测试(6PBRT)评估无支撑的功能性手臂运动能力。手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾问卷(Q-DASH)用于手臂功能。结果乳腺癌患者的6PBRT评分显著低于健康对照组(分别为194.16±34.91环和218.87±43.87环,p = 0.004, η = 0.065)。患者的平均Q-DASH评分为22.12±15.70。根据Q-DASH评分,35.6% (n = 16)的参与者手臂功能被分类为正常,51.1% (n = 23)有问题但工作,13.3% (n = 6)无法工作。乳腺癌患者6PBRT表现与Q-DASH评分呈显著的中度负相关(r = -0.453, p = 0.002)。结论乳腺癌幸存者上肢运动能力和功能受到负面影响。因此,在乳腺癌医学治疗后的长期随访中,心脏肿瘤康复方法应纳入手臂有氧运动训练,以改善手臂功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书