Assessing group size and the demographic composition of a canopy‐dwelling primate, the northern muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus), using arboreal camera trapping and genetic tagging
Mariane C. Kaizer, Naiara G. Sales, Thiago H. G. Alvim, Karen B. Strier, Fabiano R. de Melo, Jean P. Boubli, Robert J. Young, Allan D. McDevitt
{"title":"Assessing group size and the demographic composition of a canopy‐dwelling primate, the northern muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus), using arboreal camera trapping and genetic tagging","authors":"Mariane C. Kaizer, Naiara G. Sales, Thiago H. G. Alvim, Karen B. Strier, Fabiano R. de Melo, Jean P. Boubli, Robert J. Young, Allan D. McDevitt","doi":"10.1002/rse2.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obtaining accurate population measures of endangered species is critical for effective conservation and management actions and to evaluate their success over time. However, determining the population size and demographic composition of most canopy forest‐dwelling species has proven to be challenging. Here, we apply two non‐invasive biomonitoring methods, arboreal camera trap and genetic tagging of fecal samples, to estimate the population size of a critically endangered primate, the northern muriqui (<jats:italic>Brachyteles hypoxanthus</jats:italic>), in the Caparaó National Park, Brazil. When comparing group sizes between camera trapping and genetic tagging, the genetic tagging survey estimated fewer individuals for one of the muriqui groups studied but showed slightly higher population size estimates for the other group. In terms of the cost‐efficiency of both methods, arboreal camera trapping had high initial costs but was more cost‐effective in the long term. Genetic tagging, on the other hand, did not require expensive equipment for data collection but had higher associated expenses for laboratory consumables and data processing. We recommend the use of both methods for northern muriqui monitoring and provide suggestions for improving the implementation of these non‐invasive methods for future routine monitoring. Our findings also highlight the potential of arboreal camera trapping and genetic tagging for other arboreal mammals in tropical forests.","PeriodicalId":21132,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Obtaining accurate population measures of endangered species is critical for effective conservation and management actions and to evaluate their success over time. However, determining the population size and demographic composition of most canopy forest‐dwelling species has proven to be challenging. Here, we apply two non‐invasive biomonitoring methods, arboreal camera trap and genetic tagging of fecal samples, to estimate the population size of a critically endangered primate, the northern muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus), in the Caparaó National Park, Brazil. When comparing group sizes between camera trapping and genetic tagging, the genetic tagging survey estimated fewer individuals for one of the muriqui groups studied but showed slightly higher population size estimates for the other group. In terms of the cost‐efficiency of both methods, arboreal camera trapping had high initial costs but was more cost‐effective in the long term. Genetic tagging, on the other hand, did not require expensive equipment for data collection but had higher associated expenses for laboratory consumables and data processing. We recommend the use of both methods for northern muriqui monitoring and provide suggestions for improving the implementation of these non‐invasive methods for future routine monitoring. Our findings also highlight the potential of arboreal camera trapping and genetic tagging for other arboreal mammals in tropical forests.
期刊介绍:
emote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation provides a forum for rapid, peer-reviewed publication of novel, multidisciplinary research at the interface between remote sensing science and ecology and conservation. The journal prioritizes findings that advance the scientific basis of ecology and conservation, promoting the development of remote-sensing based methods relevant to the management of land use and biological systems at all levels, from populations and species to ecosystems and biomes. The journal defines remote sensing in its broadest sense, including data acquisition by hand-held and fixed ground-based sensors, such as camera traps and acoustic recorders, and sensors on airplanes and satellites. The intended journal’s audience includes ecologists, conservation scientists, policy makers, managers of terrestrial and aquatic systems, remote sensing scientists, and students.
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation is a fully open access journal from Wiley and the Zoological Society of London. Remote sensing has enormous potential as to provide information on the state of, and pressures on, biological diversity and ecosystem services, at multiple spatial and temporal scales. This new publication provides a forum for multidisciplinary research in remote sensing science, ecological research and conservation science.