A randomized open-label multicentre clinical trial comparing single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of severe obesity: BYPSADIS study protocol.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Scandinavian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-17 DOI:10.1177/14574969251385873
Javier Osorio, Claudio Lazzara, Marta Guimaraes, Antonio Torres, Victor Turrado-Rodríguez, Ainitze Ibarzabal, Lucia Sobrino, Mario Nora, Nuria Vilarrassa, Ana de Hollanda, Miguel A Rubio-Herrera, Josep Vidal, Violeta Moizé, Concepción Yarnoz, Isabel Fernandez-Falop, Manuel Portillo, Andrés Sánchez-Pernaute
{"title":"A randomized open-label multicentre clinical trial comparing single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of severe obesity: BYPSADIS study protocol.","authors":"Javier Osorio, Claudio Lazzara, Marta Guimaraes, Antonio Torres, Victor Turrado-Rodríguez, Ainitze Ibarzabal, Lucia Sobrino, Mario Nora, Nuria Vilarrassa, Ana de Hollanda, Miguel A Rubio-Herrera, Josep Vidal, Violeta Moizé, Concepción Yarnoz, Isabel Fernandez-Falop, Manuel Portillo, Andrés Sánchez-Pernaute","doi":"10.1177/14574969251385873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a standard bariatric surgical technique, associated with suboptimal response and recurrent weight gain in 25%-50% of cases. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a simplification of duodenal switch with promising results. However, a comparison of the two techniques in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) has not yet been reported. This RCT aims to compare SADI-S and RYGB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BYPSADIS is a randomized, open-label, multicentre clinical trial comparing SADI-S with RYGB. Patients aged 18-60 years with body mass index (BMI) = 40-50 kg/m<sup>2</sup> will be recruited in six hospitals. Primary endpoints are as follows: (1) efficacy, measured as percentage of patients with total weight loss (TWL) > 30% at 5 years; and (2) safety, defined as percentage of patients experiencing at least one severe complication either at 90 days postoperatively (Clavien-Dindo >2) or up to 5 years, including severe malnutrition, diarrhea, dumping, hypoglycemia, or need for surgical reintervention. Sample size was calculated for both primary outcomes, needing 432 patients to prove superiority of SADI-S in efficacy and 423 to prove non-inferiority in safety, with statistical power of 0.8, alpha risk of 0.025, assuming 10% loss throughout follow-up. To ensure power for both primary endpoints, 450 subjects will be included, 225 SADI-S and 225 RYGB. Secondary outcomes include metabolic comorbidities, quality of life, digestive symptoms (dumping, bowel habits, and GERD), need of extra supplementations, and alimentary habits. Outcomes will be compared using one-sided 95% confidence interval of proportion difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To our knowledge, there is only one ongoing RCT comparing SADI-S with RYGB (SADISLEEVE trial, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03610256), which includes primary and revisional surgeries, without BMI restrictions and with varying limb lengths. The BYPSADIS trial will complement its findings and help to bridge the knowledge gap on whether SADI-S is more effective than RYGB, while offering a similar safety profile.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the six participating hospitals and has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06789965.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"119-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969251385873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a standard bariatric surgical technique, associated with suboptimal response and recurrent weight gain in 25%-50% of cases. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a simplification of duodenal switch with promising results. However, a comparison of the two techniques in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) has not yet been reported. This RCT aims to compare SADI-S and RYGB.

Methods: BYPSADIS is a randomized, open-label, multicentre clinical trial comparing SADI-S with RYGB. Patients aged 18-60 years with body mass index (BMI) = 40-50 kg/m2 will be recruited in six hospitals. Primary endpoints are as follows: (1) efficacy, measured as percentage of patients with total weight loss (TWL) > 30% at 5 years; and (2) safety, defined as percentage of patients experiencing at least one severe complication either at 90 days postoperatively (Clavien-Dindo >2) or up to 5 years, including severe malnutrition, diarrhea, dumping, hypoglycemia, or need for surgical reintervention. Sample size was calculated for both primary outcomes, needing 432 patients to prove superiority of SADI-S in efficacy and 423 to prove non-inferiority in safety, with statistical power of 0.8, alpha risk of 0.025, assuming 10% loss throughout follow-up. To ensure power for both primary endpoints, 450 subjects will be included, 225 SADI-S and 225 RYGB. Secondary outcomes include metabolic comorbidities, quality of life, digestive symptoms (dumping, bowel habits, and GERD), need of extra supplementations, and alimentary habits. Outcomes will be compared using one-sided 95% confidence interval of proportion difference between groups.

Discussion: To our knowledge, there is only one ongoing RCT comparing SADI-S with RYGB (SADISLEEVE trial, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03610256), which includes primary and revisional surgeries, without BMI restrictions and with varying limb lengths. The BYPSADIS trial will complement its findings and help to bridge the knowledge gap on whether SADI-S is more effective than RYGB, while offering a similar safety profile.

Trial registration: The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the six participating hospitals and has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06789965.

一项随机开放标签多中心临床试验比较单吻合术十二指肠开关(SADI-S)与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗严重肥胖:BYPSADIS研究方案。
背景:Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术(RYGB)是一种标准的减肥手术技术,在25%-50%的病例中,反应不佳和复发性体重增加相关。单吻合术十二指肠回肠旁路加套筒胃切除术(SADI-S)是一种简化十二指肠切换的方法,具有良好的效果。然而,两种技术在随机临床试验(RCT)中的比较尚未有报道。本随机对照试验旨在比较SADI-S和RYGB。方法:BYPSADIS是一项随机、开放标签、多中心临床试验,比较SADI-S和RYGB。在6家医院招募年龄在18-60岁,身体质量指数(BMI) = 40-50 kg/m2的患者。主要终点如下:(1)疗效,以患者总体重减轻(TWL)的百分比(5年时达到30%)衡量;(2)安全性,定义为在术后90天(Clavien-Dindo bbb2)或长达5年出现至少一种严重并发症的患者百分比,包括严重营养不良、腹泻、倾倒、低血糖或需要手术再干预。计算两个主要结局的样本量,证明SADI-S疗效优越性需要432例,证明安全性非劣效性需要423例,统计幂为0.8,alpha风险为0.025,假设随访期间损失10%。为了确保两个主要终点的有效性,将纳入450名受试者,225名SADI-S和225名RYGB。次要结局包括代谢合并症、生活质量、消化症状(倾倒、排便习惯和反流)、额外补充的需要和饮食习惯。结果采用组间比例差异的单侧95%置信区间进行比较。讨论:据我们所知,只有一项正在进行的比较SADI-S和RYGB的随机对照试验(SADISLEEVE试验,ClinicalTrials.gov标识号NCT03610256),其中包括原发性和改进性手术,没有BMI限制,肢体长度不同。BYPSADIS试验将补充其发现,并有助于弥合关于SADI-S是否比RYGB更有效的知识差距,同时提供类似的安全性。试验注册:研究方案已获得六家参与医院伦理委员会的批准,并已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号NCT06789965。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书