Budget Impact Analysis of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Patients with Severe Blepharospasm in Thailand.

IF 2.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-10-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S540982
Parima Hirunwiwatkul, Unchalee Permsuwan, Sureerat Ngamkiatphaisan, Niphon Chirapapaisan, Jiruth Sriratanaban
{"title":"Budget Impact Analysis of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Patients with Severe Blepharospasm in Thailand.","authors":"Parima Hirunwiwatkul, Unchalee Permsuwan, Sureerat Ngamkiatphaisan, Niphon Chirapapaisan, Jiruth Sriratanaban","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S540982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Severe blepharospasm is a disabling neurological condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is considered the standard treatment due to its targeted therapeutic effect and fewer systemic side effects compared to oral medications. However, its high cost poses a barrier to access within Thailand's healthcare system. This study aimed to assess the budget impact of introducing BoNT-A treatment (Onabotulinumtoxin A and Abobotulinumtoxin A) compared with current oral medications for severe blepharospasm in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A budget impact model was developed from the perspective of Thailand's healthcare system over a 5-year time horizon. The current scenario (oral medications use) was compared with a new scenario involving BoNT-A treatment. The costs considered included drug acquisition, outpatient visits, and accident-related injuries. The base-case assumed gradual uptake of BoNT-A (30% in year 1, 50% in year 2, and 100% from year 3). Sensitivity analyses explored full uptake from year 1, no dose sharing, and inclusion of injury-related costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Excluding injury-related costs, the 5-year net budget impact (NBI) was 7.91 million THB (223,040 USD) for onabotulinumtoxin A and 7.27 million THB (205,064 USD) for abobotulinumtoxin A. Including injury-related costs reduced the NBI to 4.20 million THB (118,564 USD) and 3.57 million THB (100,588 USD), respectively. Without dose sharing, the NBI rose significantly, reaching 40.5 million THB (1.14 million USD) for abobotulinumtoxin A.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BoNT-A treatment increases healthcare costs, primarily due to drug costs. However, reduced injury costs and dose-sharing strategies may enhance affordability and support BoNT-A's inclusion in Thailand's National List of Essential Medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"717-728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S540982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Severe blepharospasm is a disabling neurological condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is considered the standard treatment due to its targeted therapeutic effect and fewer systemic side effects compared to oral medications. However, its high cost poses a barrier to access within Thailand's healthcare system. This study aimed to assess the budget impact of introducing BoNT-A treatment (Onabotulinumtoxin A and Abobotulinumtoxin A) compared with current oral medications for severe blepharospasm in Thailand.

Methods: A budget impact model was developed from the perspective of Thailand's healthcare system over a 5-year time horizon. The current scenario (oral medications use) was compared with a new scenario involving BoNT-A treatment. The costs considered included drug acquisition, outpatient visits, and accident-related injuries. The base-case assumed gradual uptake of BoNT-A (30% in year 1, 50% in year 2, and 100% from year 3). Sensitivity analyses explored full uptake from year 1, no dose sharing, and inclusion of injury-related costs.

Results: Excluding injury-related costs, the 5-year net budget impact (NBI) was 7.91 million THB (223,040 USD) for onabotulinumtoxin A and 7.27 million THB (205,064 USD) for abobotulinumtoxin A. Including injury-related costs reduced the NBI to 4.20 million THB (118,564 USD) and 3.57 million THB (100,588 USD), respectively. Without dose sharing, the NBI rose significantly, reaching 40.5 million THB (1.14 million USD) for abobotulinumtoxin A.

Conclusion: BoNT-A treatment increases healthcare costs, primarily due to drug costs. However, reduced injury costs and dose-sharing strategies may enhance affordability and support BoNT-A's inclusion in Thailand's National List of Essential Medicine.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

泰国A型肉毒毒素对严重眼睑痉挛患者的预算影响分析。
目的:重度眼睑痉挛是一种严重影响患者生活质量的致残性神经系统疾病。A型肉毒毒素(BoNT-A)被认为是标准的治疗方法,因为它具有靶向治疗效果,与口服药物相比,全身副作用更少。然而,它的高成本对泰国医疗保健系统内的使用构成了障碍。本研究旨在评估泰国引入BoNT-A治疗(肉毒杆菌毒素A和肉毒杆菌毒素A)与目前口服药物治疗严重眼睑痉挛的预算影响。方法:从泰国医疗保健系统的角度开发了一个预算影响模型,时间跨度为5年。目前的情况(口服药物使用)与新的情况(BoNT-A治疗)进行比较。考虑的费用包括药品购买、门诊就诊和事故相关伤害。基本情况假设BoNT-A逐渐吸收(第1年30%,第2年50%,第3年100%)。敏感性分析探讨了从第1年开始的完全吸收,没有剂量共享,并包括与伤害相关的费用。结果:排除伤害相关成本,肉毒杆菌毒素A的5年净预算影响(NBI)为791万泰铢(223,040美元),肉毒杆菌毒素A的5年净预算影响(NBI)为727万泰铢(205,064美元)。包括伤害相关成本,NBI分别降至420万泰铢(118,564美元)和357万泰铢(100,588美元)。在没有剂量共享的情况下,肉毒杆菌毒素a的NBI显著上升,达到4050万泰铢(114万美元)。结论:BoNT-A治疗增加了医疗成本,主要是由于药物成本。然而,降低伤害成本和剂量共享策略可能会提高可负担性,并支持将BoNT-A纳入泰国国家基本药物清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书