Quantitative next generation risk assessment for skin sensitization - application of regression models based on in vitro data to estimate point of departure.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Isabelle Lee, Mihwa Na, Maura Lavelle, Isabella Schember, Marissa A Guttenberg, G Frank Gerberick, Andreas Natsch, Cindy Ryan, Anne Marie Api
{"title":"Quantitative next generation risk assessment for skin sensitization - application of regression models based on in vitro data to estimate point of departure.","authors":"Isabelle Lee, Mihwa Na, Maura Lavelle, Isabella Schember, Marissa A Guttenberg, G Frank Gerberick, Andreas Natsch, Cindy Ryan, Anne Marie Api","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for dermal sensitization is essential for determining safe concentrations of skin sensitizers in consumer products. The fragrance industry developed the QRA2 approach, which uses the No Expected Sensitization Induction Level (NESIL) as a starting reference dose or point of departure (PoD). Animal alternatives for potency assessment have emerged to calculate quantitative PoDs. One such alternative is in vitro-based regression models. Herein, a framework for incorporating regression models into next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) is presented. The framework begins with hazard assessment using in vitro methods (OECD Guideline 497), followed by PoD calculation through regression models, and completed with QRA2. After determining a PoD, uncertainty factors may be considered to derive a new approach methodology NESIL (NAM-NESIL). Case studies are presented with two sensitizers, p-mentha-1,8-dien-7-al (CAS # 2111-75-3) and 3-propylidenephthalide (CAS # 17369-59-4), calculating acceptable exposure levels (AELs) for products like deodorants and bar soaps. Ratios of the AELs to consumer exposure levels (CELs) were then calculated to determine whether the current use is safe. Comparison of QRA based on NAM-NESILs to historically human-derived NESILs supports the reliability of in vitro models. This approach offers a promising alternative for PoD derivation, potentially eliminating the need for animal data or confirmatory human testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105964"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for dermal sensitization is essential for determining safe concentrations of skin sensitizers in consumer products. The fragrance industry developed the QRA2 approach, which uses the No Expected Sensitization Induction Level (NESIL) as a starting reference dose or point of departure (PoD). Animal alternatives for potency assessment have emerged to calculate quantitative PoDs. One such alternative is in vitro-based regression models. Herein, a framework for incorporating regression models into next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) is presented. The framework begins with hazard assessment using in vitro methods (OECD Guideline 497), followed by PoD calculation through regression models, and completed with QRA2. After determining a PoD, uncertainty factors may be considered to derive a new approach methodology NESIL (NAM-NESIL). Case studies are presented with two sensitizers, p-mentha-1,8-dien-7-al (CAS # 2111-75-3) and 3-propylidenephthalide (CAS # 17369-59-4), calculating acceptable exposure levels (AELs) for products like deodorants and bar soaps. Ratios of the AELs to consumer exposure levels (CELs) were then calculated to determine whether the current use is safe. Comparison of QRA based on NAM-NESILs to historically human-derived NESILs supports the reliability of in vitro models. This approach offers a promising alternative for PoD derivation, potentially eliminating the need for animal data or confirmatory human testing.

定量下一代皮肤致敏风险评估-应用基于体外数据的回归模型来估计起点。
皮肤致敏的定量风险评估(QRA)对于确定消费品中皮肤致敏剂的安全浓度至关重要。香料行业开发了QRA2方法,该方法使用无预期致敏诱导水平(NESIL)作为起始参考剂量或出发点(PoD)。已经出现了用于效价评估的动物替代品来计算定量pod。其中一种选择是基于体外的回归模型。本文提出了一个将回归模型纳入下一代风险评估(NGRA)的框架。该框架首先使用体外方法进行危害评估(OECD指南497),然后通过回归模型计算PoD,最后使用QRA2完成。在确定PoD后,考虑不确定性因素可以推导出一种新的方法NESIL (NAM-NESIL)。案例研究采用两种致敏剂,对薄荷-1,8-二烯-7-al (CAS # 2111-75-3)和3-丙基酞(CAS # 17369-59-4),计算除臭剂和肥皂等产品的可接受暴露水平(AELs)。然后计算AELs与消费者暴露水平(CELs)的比率,以确定当前的使用是否安全。基于NAM-NESILs的QRA与历史上人类来源的NESILs的比较支持体外模型的可靠性。这种方法为PoD衍生提供了一种有希望的替代方法,有可能消除对动物数据或确认性人体测试的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信