BOIN-MEM: A Two-Stage Design for Dose Optimization With Information Borrowing Across Dose Levels and Stages in Oncology Phase I/II Trials.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ryo Kitabayashi, Kentaro Takeda, Hiroyuki Sato, Akihiro Hirakawa
{"title":"BOIN-MEM: A Two-Stage Design for Dose Optimization With Information Borrowing Across Dose Levels and Stages in Oncology Phase I/II Trials.","authors":"Ryo Kitabayashi, Kentaro Takeda, Hiroyuki Sato, Akihiro Hirakawa","doi":"10.1002/pst.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The launch of Project Optimus has shifted a paradigm in oncology early-phase trials toward identifying the optimal biological dose (OBD), considering both the drug's toxicity and efficacy. Conventional two-stage designs for dose optimization in phase I/II trials typically identify tolerable dose levels in Stage 1, followed by selecting the OBD based on efficacy at expansion cohorts in Stage 2. However, these designs could be inefficient because toxicity and efficacy data from patients in Stage 1 treated at dose levels excluded from Stage 2 are not explicitly used in the final OBD determination. To address this issue, we developed a novel two-stage design for dose optimization in oncology phase I/II trials. This design, termed BOIN-MEM, leverages Bayesian optimal interval design (BOIN) for Stage 1 and extends multi-source exchangeability models (MEM) to facilitate information borrowing across dose levels and stages when selecting the OBD at the end of Stage 2. This information borrowing strategy is based on utility for each dose level, which is a measure representing a drug's clinical value, calculated based on the toxicity and efficacy outcomes, and their pre-specified scores. BOIN-MEM allows for the estimation of mean utility, considering heterogeneity not only between dose levels but also between stages due to variations in the target population. Through comprehensive simulation studies with practical scenarios of dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy relationships, BOIN-MEM demonstrated higher accuracy of OBD selection and reduced patient exposure to overdoses compared with existing designs under various scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"24 6","pages":"e70045"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The launch of Project Optimus has shifted a paradigm in oncology early-phase trials toward identifying the optimal biological dose (OBD), considering both the drug's toxicity and efficacy. Conventional two-stage designs for dose optimization in phase I/II trials typically identify tolerable dose levels in Stage 1, followed by selecting the OBD based on efficacy at expansion cohorts in Stage 2. However, these designs could be inefficient because toxicity and efficacy data from patients in Stage 1 treated at dose levels excluded from Stage 2 are not explicitly used in the final OBD determination. To address this issue, we developed a novel two-stage design for dose optimization in oncology phase I/II trials. This design, termed BOIN-MEM, leverages Bayesian optimal interval design (BOIN) for Stage 1 and extends multi-source exchangeability models (MEM) to facilitate information borrowing across dose levels and stages when selecting the OBD at the end of Stage 2. This information borrowing strategy is based on utility for each dose level, which is a measure representing a drug's clinical value, calculated based on the toxicity and efficacy outcomes, and their pre-specified scores. BOIN-MEM allows for the estimation of mean utility, considering heterogeneity not only between dose levels but also between stages due to variations in the target population. Through comprehensive simulation studies with practical scenarios of dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy relationships, BOIN-MEM demonstrated higher accuracy of OBD selection and reduced patient exposure to overdoses compared with existing designs under various scenarios.

BOIN-MEM:肿瘤I/II期临床试验中剂量水平和阶段信息借鉴的两阶段剂量优化设计
考虑到药物的毒性和疗效,Optimus项目的推出改变了肿瘤早期试验的模式,使其转向确定最佳生物剂量(OBD)。在I/II期试验中,传统的两阶段剂量优化设计通常在第一阶段确定可耐受剂量水平,然后在第二阶段根据扩大队列的疗效选择OBD。然而,这些设计可能是低效的,因为在排除在2期的剂量水平下治疗的1期患者的毒性和疗效数据没有明确用于最终的OBD测定。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种新的两阶段设计,用于肿瘤I/II期试验的剂量优化。该设计被称为BOIN-MEM,在阶段1中利用贝叶斯最优间隔设计(BOIN),并扩展多源交换模型(MEM),以便在阶段2结束时选择OBD时跨剂量水平和阶段的信息借鉴。这种信息借用策略基于每个剂量水平的效用,这是一种代表药物临床价值的度量,根据毒性和疗效结果及其预先指定的分数计算。BOIN-MEM允许估计平均效用,不仅考虑剂量水平之间的异质性,而且考虑由于目标人群变化而导致的不同阶段之间的异质性。通过对剂量-毒性和剂量-功效关系的实际场景的综合模拟研究,与现有设计相比,BOIN-MEM在各种场景下都具有更高的OBD选择准确性,并减少了患者的过量暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书