End User Adaptation Experiences, Implementation Strategies, and Lessons Learned With the VIONE Medication Optimization and Safe Deprescribing Project in the Federal Health System.
Kimberly Dickerson, Shira Winter, Saraswathy Battar, Christopher Sedgwick, Ashleigh Wallace-Lacey, Leah Satlak, Kayley Perkins, Mary Thoennes, Megan Fenney, Keilana Fisher, Dawn Currie, Janin Monterrey, William Hung
{"title":"End User Adaptation Experiences, Implementation Strategies, and Lessons Learned With the VIONE Medication Optimization and Safe Deprescribing Project in the Federal Health System.","authors":"Kimberly Dickerson, Shira Winter, Saraswathy Battar, Christopher Sedgwick, Ashleigh Wallace-Lacey, Leah Satlak, Kayley Perkins, Mary Thoennes, Megan Fenney, Keilana Fisher, Dawn Currie, Janin Monterrey, William Hung","doi":"10.1177/08971900251383990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> There is extensive evidence linking Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) use and adverse health outcomes. The VIONE core team and VA multidisciplinary partners created, implemented and disseminated the VIONE methodology across VA sites nationwide to facilitate and track deprescribing, through coaching, medical informatics and integration with the electronic health record. The purpose of this article is to report 3 sites in the federal health system (2 VA and 1 Indian Health Services) unique experiences of implementing and adapting VIONE locally while maintaining fidelity to fundamental VIONE intervention strategies. <b>Methods:</b> Three VA sites reported experiences of implementing VIONE, including an overview of the clinical workflow, clinicians involved, facilitators and barriers of implementation, and results. <b>Results:</b> The VIONE intervention was adapted for site-specific implementation. Personnel included trainees, clinical pharmacists, and home based primary care programs. Local and national dashboards were used to identify Veterans at high risk for polypharmacy and to track deprescribing. Implementation remained consistent with the VIONE core characteristics and facilitated education and conversations about medications with patients and caregivers. Adaptations were made at each site to meet that site's needs. Implementation resulted in safe deprescribing practices and staff empowerment with significant cost savings. <b>Conclusion:</b> The VIONE methodology and tools are adaptable across clinical settings with inherent flexibility to local workflows and practice preferences by end users. VIONE presents a standardized, easy-to-use method for promoting medication review for older adults. Further evaluation may help identify best practices to promote positive outcomes related to deprescribing and reducing polypharmacy in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"287-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251383990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: There is extensive evidence linking Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) use and adverse health outcomes. The VIONE core team and VA multidisciplinary partners created, implemented and disseminated the VIONE methodology across VA sites nationwide to facilitate and track deprescribing, through coaching, medical informatics and integration with the electronic health record. The purpose of this article is to report 3 sites in the federal health system (2 VA and 1 Indian Health Services) unique experiences of implementing and adapting VIONE locally while maintaining fidelity to fundamental VIONE intervention strategies. Methods: Three VA sites reported experiences of implementing VIONE, including an overview of the clinical workflow, clinicians involved, facilitators and barriers of implementation, and results. Results: The VIONE intervention was adapted for site-specific implementation. Personnel included trainees, clinical pharmacists, and home based primary care programs. Local and national dashboards were used to identify Veterans at high risk for polypharmacy and to track deprescribing. Implementation remained consistent with the VIONE core characteristics and facilitated education and conversations about medications with patients and caregivers. Adaptations were made at each site to meet that site's needs. Implementation resulted in safe deprescribing practices and staff empowerment with significant cost savings. Conclusion: The VIONE methodology and tools are adaptable across clinical settings with inherent flexibility to local workflows and practice preferences by end users. VIONE presents a standardized, easy-to-use method for promoting medication review for older adults. Further evaluation may help identify best practices to promote positive outcomes related to deprescribing and reducing polypharmacy in older adults.
目的:有大量证据表明潜在不适当药物(PIM)的使用与不良健康结果有关。VIONE核心团队和VA多学科合作伙伴创建、实施并在VA全国站点传播VIONE方法,通过指导、医疗信息和与电子健康记录的集成来促进和跟踪处方。本文的目的是报告联邦卫生系统中的3个站点(2个VA和1个Indian health Services)在本地实施和适应VIONE的独特经验,同时保持对基本VIONE干预策略的忠诚。方法:三个VA站点报告了实施VIONE的经验,包括临床工作流程概述、参与的临床医生、实施的促进因素和障碍以及结果。结果:VIONE干预措施适用于具体地点实施。人员包括受训人员、临床药剂师和家庭初级保健项目。地方和国家的仪表板被用来识别有多重用药高风险的退伍军人,并跟踪处方的减少。实施与VIONE的核心特征保持一致,并促进了与患者和护理人员关于药物的教育和对话。每个站点都进行了调整以满足该站点的需求。实施的结果是安全的处方实践和员工授权,大大节省了成本。结论:VIONE方法和工具在临床环境中具有适应性,对当地工作流程和最终用户的实践偏好具有固有的灵活性。VIONE提出了一个标准化的,易于使用的方法来促进老年人的药物审查。进一步的评估可能有助于确定最佳做法,以促进与老年人减少处方和减少多药相关的积极结果。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.