{"title":"A comprehensive evaluation framework for synthetic medical tabular data generation","authors":"Anastasia Kurakova, Hajar Homayouni","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Machine learning (ML) applications have enabled significant advancements in healthcare, such as predicting pandemics, personalizing treatments, and developing life-saving drugs. However, ML model training requires large datasets, which are difficult to obtain in healthcare due to privacy concerns. Synthetic data generation offers a promising solution by providing access to large-scale training data while protecting patient privacy. Our research focuses on tabular medical data, the predominant format for Electronic Health Records (EHRs), and introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses synthetic data in four critical dimensions: quality, privacy, usability, and computational complexity of the data generation process. The framework ensures that synthetic data maintains sufficient similarity to real data for ML applications while preserving patient confidentiality. To validate our approach, we applied six state-of-the-art (SOTA) generative models to generate synthetic medical datasets and evaluated them within our framework. In contrast to conventional approaches that focus primarily on statistical similarity, our framework provides a broader assessment that incorporates outlier detection, privacy risks, and domain-specific constraints. Our findings demonstrate that our framework can identify critical shortcomings in synthetic data generation models, such as the amplification of duplicate rows and the generation of out-of-range values, which are overlooked by traditional statistical evaluation methods. Our implementation of the framework is available at: <span><span>https://github.com/akurakova/SDE_Framework</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104939"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425001686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) applications have enabled significant advancements in healthcare, such as predicting pandemics, personalizing treatments, and developing life-saving drugs. However, ML model training requires large datasets, which are difficult to obtain in healthcare due to privacy concerns. Synthetic data generation offers a promising solution by providing access to large-scale training data while protecting patient privacy. Our research focuses on tabular medical data, the predominant format for Electronic Health Records (EHRs), and introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses synthetic data in four critical dimensions: quality, privacy, usability, and computational complexity of the data generation process. The framework ensures that synthetic data maintains sufficient similarity to real data for ML applications while preserving patient confidentiality. To validate our approach, we applied six state-of-the-art (SOTA) generative models to generate synthetic medical datasets and evaluated them within our framework. In contrast to conventional approaches that focus primarily on statistical similarity, our framework provides a broader assessment that incorporates outlier detection, privacy risks, and domain-specific constraints. Our findings demonstrate that our framework can identify critical shortcomings in synthetic data generation models, such as the amplification of duplicate rows and the generation of out-of-range values, which are overlooked by traditional statistical evaluation methods. Our implementation of the framework is available at: https://github.com/akurakova/SDE_Framework
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.