François Barde , Kevin Chevalier , Paul Decker , Matéo Merin , Amélie Nicolas , Alain Lescoat , Alban Deroux , Vincent Koether , Emmanuel Chatelus , Cyrille Coustal , Alexandre Maria , Martin Michaud , Grégory Pugnet , Anne Murarasu , Sébastien Riviere , Pierre Charles , Claire de Moreuil , Juliette Lodovichetti , François Maillet , Arthur Renaud , Benjamin Chaigne
{"title":"Evaluation of the mycophenolate mofetil–rituximab combination in systemic sclerosis: a French retrospective multicenter study (MycRiSSc)","authors":"François Barde , Kevin Chevalier , Paul Decker , Matéo Merin , Amélie Nicolas , Alain Lescoat , Alban Deroux , Vincent Koether , Emmanuel Chatelus , Cyrille Coustal , Alexandre Maria , Martin Michaud , Grégory Pugnet , Anne Murarasu , Sébastien Riviere , Pierre Charles , Claire de Moreuil , Juliette Lodovichetti , François Maillet , Arthur Renaud , Benjamin Chaigne","doi":"10.1016/j.jaut.2025.103492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) are recommended as first-line therapies for skin and interstitial lung disease (ILD) involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, data on their combined use remain limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of MMF/RTX combination therapy compared to each drug alone.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective multicenter French study including SSc patients treated with MMF, RTX, or MMF/RTX combination for ≥12-months. Primary outcomes were changes in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with improvement in skin or ILD and adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-seven patients received MMF/RTX combination, 30 received RTX, and 50 received MMF. At 12 months, intra-group analyses showed significant mRSS improvement with MMF/RTX combination and MMF (p = 0.002 and p = 0.04, respectively). FVC increased significantly only with combination group (p = 0.003). In multivariate inter-group analysis, MMF/RTX combination was independently associated with greater mRSS improvement versus RTX (OR 0.07, 95 % CI [0.007–0.67], p = 0.02) and greater skin and/or lung improvement compared to RTX (OR 0.27 [0.08–0.89], p = 0.03) or MMF (OR 0.24 [0.07–0.81], p = 0.02). Adverse events were not significantly increased with MMF/RTX combination. In subgroup analyses restricted to MMF/RTX combination group, patients with upfront initiation significantly improved their FVC compared to patients with sequential introduction. Upfront initiation of MMF/RTX was associated with ILD improvement in multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In SSc, MMF/RTX combination is well-tolerated and improves skin and ILD involvement, particularly when MMF and RTX are introduced simultaneously.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoimmunity","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 103492"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of autoimmunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896841125001374","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) are recommended as first-line therapies for skin and interstitial lung disease (ILD) involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, data on their combined use remain limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of MMF/RTX combination therapy compared to each drug alone.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective multicenter French study including SSc patients treated with MMF, RTX, or MMF/RTX combination for ≥12-months. Primary outcomes were changes in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with improvement in skin or ILD and adverse events.
Results
Forty-seven patients received MMF/RTX combination, 30 received RTX, and 50 received MMF. At 12 months, intra-group analyses showed significant mRSS improvement with MMF/RTX combination and MMF (p = 0.002 and p = 0.04, respectively). FVC increased significantly only with combination group (p = 0.003). In multivariate inter-group analysis, MMF/RTX combination was independently associated with greater mRSS improvement versus RTX (OR 0.07, 95 % CI [0.007–0.67], p = 0.02) and greater skin and/or lung improvement compared to RTX (OR 0.27 [0.08–0.89], p = 0.03) or MMF (OR 0.24 [0.07–0.81], p = 0.02). Adverse events were not significantly increased with MMF/RTX combination. In subgroup analyses restricted to MMF/RTX combination group, patients with upfront initiation significantly improved their FVC compared to patients with sequential introduction. Upfront initiation of MMF/RTX was associated with ILD improvement in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
In SSc, MMF/RTX combination is well-tolerated and improves skin and ILD involvement, particularly when MMF and RTX are introduced simultaneously.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Autoimmunity serves as the primary publication for research on various facets of autoimmunity. These include topics such as the mechanism of self-recognition, regulation of autoimmune responses, experimental autoimmune diseases, diagnostic tests for autoantibodies, as well as the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of autoimmune diseases. While the journal covers a wide range of subjects, it emphasizes papers exploring the genetic, molecular biology, and cellular aspects of the field.
The Journal of Translational Autoimmunity, on the other hand, is a subsidiary journal of the Journal of Autoimmunity. It focuses specifically on translating scientific discoveries in autoimmunity into clinical applications and practical solutions. By highlighting research that bridges the gap between basic science and clinical practice, the Journal of Translational Autoimmunity aims to advance the understanding and treatment of autoimmune diseases.