Oviyaasri Manimuthukumar, M Manjuladevi, T Arunkumar
{"title":"Global trends in post-market surveillance of high-risk medical devices: An empirical analysis based on regulatory data.","authors":"Oviyaasri Manimuthukumar, M Manjuladevi, T Arunkumar","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_86_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives To analyse post-market surveillance (PMS) trends for high-risk medical devices (Class IIb and III) in different geographic regions and evaluate the effectiveness of field safety corrective actions (FSCAs) in mitigating device-related risks. Methods This study utilised 2024 data from EUDAMED (European Database on Medical Devices), BfArM (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte), and MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (FDA database)) to identify recurring incidents, associated device types, and the outcomes of FSCAs. A quantitative analysis was conducted to evaluate the frequency and severity of reported incidents, focusing on hardware failures, software malfunctions, and calibration issues. The impact of recalls, software updates, and field modifications on incident recurrence was also assessed. Results Orthopaedic implants, infusion pumps, and cardiac monitoring devices reported the highest number of incidents, primarily due to hardware failures and software issues. FSCAs involving hardware modifications significantly reduced recurrence rates, particularly for high-risk devices like pacemakers and ventilators. In contrast, software-driven devices exhibited persistent issues despite corrective actions, highlighting challenges in maintaining long-term reliability. Interpretation & conclusions The findings underscore the importance of robust PMS systems and tailored corrective actions in mitigating risks associated with high-risk medical devices. While FSCAs have demonstrated effectiveness in addressing hardware-related failures, enhancements in regulatory frameworks are necessary to improve the management of software-driven devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"162 2","pages":"163-168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_86_2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background & objectives To analyse post-market surveillance (PMS) trends for high-risk medical devices (Class IIb and III) in different geographic regions and evaluate the effectiveness of field safety corrective actions (FSCAs) in mitigating device-related risks. Methods This study utilised 2024 data from EUDAMED (European Database on Medical Devices), BfArM (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte), and MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (FDA database)) to identify recurring incidents, associated device types, and the outcomes of FSCAs. A quantitative analysis was conducted to evaluate the frequency and severity of reported incidents, focusing on hardware failures, software malfunctions, and calibration issues. The impact of recalls, software updates, and field modifications on incident recurrence was also assessed. Results Orthopaedic implants, infusion pumps, and cardiac monitoring devices reported the highest number of incidents, primarily due to hardware failures and software issues. FSCAs involving hardware modifications significantly reduced recurrence rates, particularly for high-risk devices like pacemakers and ventilators. In contrast, software-driven devices exhibited persistent issues despite corrective actions, highlighting challenges in maintaining long-term reliability. Interpretation & conclusions The findings underscore the importance of robust PMS systems and tailored corrective actions in mitigating risks associated with high-risk medical devices. While FSCAs have demonstrated effectiveness in addressing hardware-related failures, enhancements in regulatory frameworks are necessary to improve the management of software-driven devices.
背景与目的分析不同地理区域高风险医疗器械(IIb和III类)的上市后监测(PMS)趋势,并评估现场安全纠正措施(fsca)在减轻器械相关风险方面的有效性。方法:本研究利用来自EUDAMED(欧洲医疗器械数据库)、BfArM (Bundesinstitut f r Arzneimittel und medizinproduckte)和MAUDE(制造商和用户设施设备体验(FDA数据库))的2024年数据来识别fsca的重复事件、相关设备类型和结果。进行定量分析以评估报告事件的频率和严重程度,重点关注硬件故障、软件故障和校准问题。还评估了召回、软件更新和现场修改对事件复发的影响。结果骨科植入物、输液泵和心脏监测设备报告的事故数量最多,主要是由于硬件故障和软件问题。涉及硬件修改的fsca显著降低了复发率,特别是对于起搏器和呼吸机等高风险设备。相比之下,软件驱动的设备尽管采取了纠正措施,但仍存在持续存在的问题,这凸显了保持长期可靠性的挑战。研究结果强调了健全的PMS系统和量身定制的纠正措施在减轻高风险医疗器械相关风险方面的重要性。虽然fsca在解决硬件相关故障方面已经证明了有效性,但加强监管框架对于改善软件驱动设备的管理是必要的。
期刊介绍:
The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.