Rational use of antibiotics at primary & secondary healthcare facilities in district Panchkula, Haryana, North India: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Adarsh Bansal, Madhu Gupta, Nusrat Shafiq, Atul Saroch, Jayashree Muralidharan, Neeraj Arora, Mukta Kumar, Sonia Trikha
{"title":"Rational use of antibiotics at primary & secondary healthcare facilities in district Panchkula, Haryana, North India: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Adarsh Bansal, Madhu Gupta, Nusrat Shafiq, Atul Saroch, Jayashree Muralidharan, Neeraj Arora, Mukta Kumar, Sonia Trikha","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_1146_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives Antimicrobial prescriptions by doctors are crucial in managing acute illnesses but contribute significantly to antimicrobial resistance if misused. This study aimed to assess the rational use of antibiotics in outpatient public healthcare settings in Panchkula, Haryana. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted across 18 primary and two secondary healthcare facilities in the district of Panchkula, Haryana. Antimicrobial prescriptions (n=945) were assessed for comprehensiveness and rationality using the pretested and validated antimicrobial prescription assessment tool and standard treatment guidelines. World Health Organisation's anatomic therapeutic chemical and defined daily dose index (WHOCC-ATC/DDD) was used to calculate defined daily dose (DDD) for adult prescriptions, and days of therapy (DOT) were calculated for paediatric patients. We used descriptive statistics to summarise the findings and chi-square test to compare the proportions of rational and irrational prescriptions. Results Of 945 antibiotic prescriptions, only 0.4 per cent (n=4) of prescriptions were comprehensive. Among prescriptions eligible for rationality assessment (n=647, 68.5%) antibiotic therapy was indicated in 44 per cent (n=285), of which only 3.5 per cent (n=33) were rational, 20.2 per cent (n=191) moderately rational and 76.3 per cent irrational (n=721). Irrational prescriptions were most common in respiratory (n=415, 95%), gastrointestinal (n=105, 92.9%), and dermatological (n=21, 76%) ailments. The completeness of the prescriptions was low, with information on dosage of antibiotics (n=265, 28%), laboratory investigations (n=331, 35%), diagnosis (n=94, 10%), and co-morbidities (n=96, 10%). The prescribed antibiotic doses exceeded the WHO-DDD recommendations, with irrational prescribing significantly higher among paediatric prescriptions (89.6%) as compared with adult prescriptions (74.3%; adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.7, P<0.001). Interpretation & conclusions Antibiotic prescriptions in primary and secondary care outpatient departments demonstrated widespread irrationality, highlighting the importance of implementing a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship programme in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"162 2","pages":"175-185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_1146_2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives Antimicrobial prescriptions by doctors are crucial in managing acute illnesses but contribute significantly to antimicrobial resistance if misused. This study aimed to assess the rational use of antibiotics in outpatient public healthcare settings in Panchkula, Haryana. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted across 18 primary and two secondary healthcare facilities in the district of Panchkula, Haryana. Antimicrobial prescriptions (n=945) were assessed for comprehensiveness and rationality using the pretested and validated antimicrobial prescription assessment tool and standard treatment guidelines. World Health Organisation's anatomic therapeutic chemical and defined daily dose index (WHOCC-ATC/DDD) was used to calculate defined daily dose (DDD) for adult prescriptions, and days of therapy (DOT) were calculated for paediatric patients. We used descriptive statistics to summarise the findings and chi-square test to compare the proportions of rational and irrational prescriptions. Results Of 945 antibiotic prescriptions, only 0.4 per cent (n=4) of prescriptions were comprehensive. Among prescriptions eligible for rationality assessment (n=647, 68.5%) antibiotic therapy was indicated in 44 per cent (n=285), of which only 3.5 per cent (n=33) were rational, 20.2 per cent (n=191) moderately rational and 76.3 per cent irrational (n=721). Irrational prescriptions were most common in respiratory (n=415, 95%), gastrointestinal (n=105, 92.9%), and dermatological (n=21, 76%) ailments. The completeness of the prescriptions was low, with information on dosage of antibiotics (n=265, 28%), laboratory investigations (n=331, 35%), diagnosis (n=94, 10%), and co-morbidities (n=96, 10%). The prescribed antibiotic doses exceeded the WHO-DDD recommendations, with irrational prescribing significantly higher among paediatric prescriptions (89.6%) as compared with adult prescriptions (74.3%; adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.7, P<0.001). Interpretation & conclusions Antibiotic prescriptions in primary and secondary care outpatient departments demonstrated widespread irrationality, highlighting the importance of implementing a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship programme in these settings.

印度北部哈里亚纳邦Panchkula地区初级和二级卫生保健机构合理使用抗生素:一项横断面研究
背景与目的医生开具的抗菌素处方对治疗急性疾病至关重要,但如果滥用,则会严重导致抗菌素耐药性。本研究旨在评估哈里亚纳邦Panchkula门诊公共卫生机构抗生素的合理使用情况。方法在哈里亚纳邦Panchkula地区的18个初级和2个二级卫生保健机构进行横断面研究。采用预测和验证的抗菌药物处方评估工具和标准治疗指南,对945张抗菌药物处方进行全面和合理性评估。使用世界卫生组织的解剖治疗化学和限定日剂量指数(WHOCC-ATC/DDD)计算成人处方的限定日剂量(DDD),计算儿科患者的治疗天数(DOT)。我们用描述性统计总结结果,用卡方检验比较合理处方和不合理处方的比例。结果945张抗菌药物处方中,综合处方仅占0.4% (n=4)。在符合合理性评估条件的处方(n=647, 68.5%)中,44% (n=285)处方使用抗生素治疗,其中合理处方占3.5% (n=33),中等合理处方占20.2% (n=191),不合理处方占76.3% (n=721)。不合理处方以呼吸道疾病(415例,占95%)、胃肠道疾病(105例,占92.9%)和皮肤疾病(21例,占76%)最为常见。处方的完整性较低,仅提供抗生素用量(n=265, 28%)、实验室检查(n= 3331, 35%)、诊断(n=94, 10%)和合并症(n=96, 10%)信息。处方抗生素剂量超过WHO-DDD建议,不合理处方在儿科处方中的比例(89.6%)显著高于成人处方(74.3%);调整优势比1.36,95%可信区间1.1-1.7,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信