Metformin use & asthma outcomes in patients with concurrent diabetes & bronchial asthma: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
A B M Kamrul-Hasan, Joseph M Pappachan, Parth Jethwani, Shinjan Patra, Lakshmi Nagendra, Deep Dutta, Mohammad Delwar Jahan Khan, Saptarshi Bhattacharya
{"title":"Metformin use & asthma outcomes in patients with concurrent diabetes & bronchial asthma: A systematic review & meta-analysis.","authors":"A B M Kamrul-Hasan, Joseph M Pappachan, Parth Jethwani, Shinjan Patra, Lakshmi Nagendra, Deep Dutta, Mohammad Delwar Jahan Khan, Saptarshi Bhattacharya","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_431_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives Limited data exist on the effects of metformin on asthma outcomes in patients having type 2 diabetes (T2D) along with asthma. This meta-analysis seeks to determine whether metformin influences asthma outcomes in these patients. Methods Studies involving adults with T2D and asthma, using metformin in the intervention group and other glucose-lowering drugs in the control group, were systematically searched through databases. The primary outcome was the adjusted risk of asthma exacerbations in metformin users (MU) vs. non-metformin users (non-MU). Other outcomes included asthma-related emergency room visits, hospitalisations, and the need for rescue steroids. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan with random-effects models. Outcomes were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (95% CI). Results Six retrospective cohort studies with moderate overall risk of bias, involving 317,905 patients, were included. The risk of asthma exacerbation was comparable in MU and non-MU (HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.04, P=0.27). The risk of asthma-related emergency room visits appeared lower in MU than in non-MU, though the difference did not gain statistical significance (HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.01, P=0.06). The two groups also had statistically identical risks of asthma-related hospitalisations (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.07, P=0.12) and use of rescue steroids (HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.03, P=0.24). However, after excluding a study from Taiwan (n=115486), a significantly lower risk of asthma exacerbation (HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.97, P=0.005) and asthma-related hospitalisations (HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49-0.93, P=0.02) was observed in MU. Interpretation & conclusions Metformin therapy for T2D does not influence asthma outcomes; however, certain outcomes appear to improve when a Taiwanese study is excluded. Such results must be considered cautiously, as the included studies are observational and have a moderate risk of bias. Randomised controlled trials with diverse global representation are essential for clarifying the relationship between metformin use and asthma outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"162 2","pages":"187-196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_431_2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives Limited data exist on the effects of metformin on asthma outcomes in patients having type 2 diabetes (T2D) along with asthma. This meta-analysis seeks to determine whether metformin influences asthma outcomes in these patients. Methods Studies involving adults with T2D and asthma, using metformin in the intervention group and other glucose-lowering drugs in the control group, were systematically searched through databases. The primary outcome was the adjusted risk of asthma exacerbations in metformin users (MU) vs. non-metformin users (non-MU). Other outcomes included asthma-related emergency room visits, hospitalisations, and the need for rescue steroids. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan with random-effects models. Outcomes were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (95% CI). Results Six retrospective cohort studies with moderate overall risk of bias, involving 317,905 patients, were included. The risk of asthma exacerbation was comparable in MU and non-MU (HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.04, P=0.27). The risk of asthma-related emergency room visits appeared lower in MU than in non-MU, though the difference did not gain statistical significance (HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.01, P=0.06). The two groups also had statistically identical risks of asthma-related hospitalisations (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.07, P=0.12) and use of rescue steroids (HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.03, P=0.24). However, after excluding a study from Taiwan (n=115486), a significantly lower risk of asthma exacerbation (HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.97, P=0.005) and asthma-related hospitalisations (HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49-0.93, P=0.02) was observed in MU. Interpretation & conclusions Metformin therapy for T2D does not influence asthma outcomes; however, certain outcomes appear to improve when a Taiwanese study is excluded. Such results must be considered cautiously, as the included studies are observational and have a moderate risk of bias. Randomised controlled trials with diverse global representation are essential for clarifying the relationship between metformin use and asthma outcomes.

糖尿病合并支气管哮喘患者使用二甲双胍与哮喘结局:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景与目的关于二甲双胍对2型糖尿病(T2D)合并哮喘患者哮喘结局的影响的数据有限。本荟萃分析旨在确定二甲双胍是否会影响这些患者的哮喘结局。方法系统检索t2dm合并哮喘的成人研究,干预组采用二甲双胍,对照组采用其他降糖药物。主要结局是二甲双胍服用者(MU)与非二甲双胍服用者(non-MU)哮喘恶化的调整风险。其他结果包括与哮喘相关的急诊室就诊、住院治疗和对类固醇的需要。采用RevMan随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果以95%置信区间(95% CI)的风险比(hr)报告。结果纳入6项总体偏倚风险中等的回顾性队列研究,共纳入317,905例患者。MU组和非MU组哮喘加重的风险相当(HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.04, P=0.27)。哮喘相关急诊就诊风险MU组低于非MU组,但差异无统计学意义(HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.01, P=0.06)。两组哮喘相关住院的风险(HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.07, P=0.12)和使用类固醇治疗的风险(HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.03, P=0.24)在统计学上也相同。然而,在排除一项来自台湾的研究(n=115486)后,MU患者哮喘加重的风险(HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.97, P=0.005)和哮喘相关住院的风险(HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49-0.93, P=0.02)显著降低。解释和结论:二甲双胍治疗T2D不影响哮喘结局;然而,排除台湾研究后,某些结果似乎有所改善。这些结果必须谨慎考虑,因为纳入的研究是观察性的,有中等偏倚风险。具有不同全球代表性的随机对照试验对于阐明二甲双胍使用与哮喘结局之间的关系至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信