Integrating LLMs and Knowledge Graphs for Medical AI: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Lino Murali, G Gopakumar, Daleesha M Viswanathan, Raghu Raman, Prema Nedungadi
{"title":"Integrating LLMs and Knowledge Graphs for Medical AI: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.","authors":"Lino Murali, G Gopakumar, Daleesha M Viswanathan, Raghu Raman, Prema Nedungadi","doi":"10.1109/JBHI.2025.3622058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review synthesizes how integrating large language models (LLMs) with knowledge graphs (KGs) advances medical AI across methods, applications, and evaluation. While LLMs excel at natural language understanding and contextual reasoning, KGs provide structured factual knowledge, ensuring reliability in critical domains like healthcare AI. This review explores recent advances, emphasizing how LLM-KG synergy enhances knowledge extraction, clinical decision support, and explainability in medical applications. We analyze integration methodologies across three key frameworks: (a) KG-enhanced LLMs, where KGs refine reasoning during pre-training and inference; (b) LLM-augmented KGs, where LLMs improve KG construction, reasoning, and query resolution; and (c) Synergistic LLM-KG systems, which enable bidirectional knowledge exchange for more robust AI-driven decision-making. While these models offer substantial improvements in medical diagnostics, personalized treatment, and automated knowledge discovery, key challenges remain. Issues such as data heterogeneity, reasoning transparency, computational scalability, and ethical considerations surrounding patient data must be addressed to enable real-world clinical adoption. This review outlines future directions, including cross-domain knowledge integration, neurosymbolic AI frameworks, causal reasoning for explainable predictions, and multi-agent ensemble models for adaptive decision-making. We emphasize that scalability, real-time KG updates, and privacy-preserving mechanisms are vital for responsible, high-impact AI deployment in medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":13073,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":"PP ","pages":"3833-3848"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3622058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review synthesizes how integrating large language models (LLMs) with knowledge graphs (KGs) advances medical AI across methods, applications, and evaluation. While LLMs excel at natural language understanding and contextual reasoning, KGs provide structured factual knowledge, ensuring reliability in critical domains like healthcare AI. This review explores recent advances, emphasizing how LLM-KG synergy enhances knowledge extraction, clinical decision support, and explainability in medical applications. We analyze integration methodologies across three key frameworks: (a) KG-enhanced LLMs, where KGs refine reasoning during pre-training and inference; (b) LLM-augmented KGs, where LLMs improve KG construction, reasoning, and query resolution; and (c) Synergistic LLM-KG systems, which enable bidirectional knowledge exchange for more robust AI-driven decision-making. While these models offer substantial improvements in medical diagnostics, personalized treatment, and automated knowledge discovery, key challenges remain. Issues such as data heterogeneity, reasoning transparency, computational scalability, and ethical considerations surrounding patient data must be addressed to enable real-world clinical adoption. This review outlines future directions, including cross-domain knowledge integration, neurosymbolic AI frameworks, causal reasoning for explainable predictions, and multi-agent ensemble models for adaptive decision-making. We emphasize that scalability, real-time KG updates, and privacy-preserving mechanisms are vital for responsible, high-impact AI deployment in medicine.

医学人工智能整合法学硕士和知识图谱:进展、挑战和未来方向。
这篇综述综合了如何将大型语言模型(llm)与知识图(KGs)集成在方法、应用和评估方面推进医疗人工智能。llm擅长自然语言理解和上下文推理,而KGs提供结构化的事实知识,确保医疗保健人工智能等关键领域的可靠性。这篇综述探讨了最近的进展,强调LLM-KG协同作用如何增强医学应用中的知识提取、临床决策支持和可解释性。我们分析了三个关键框架的集成方法:(a) KG-enhanced llm,其中kg在预训练和推理期间改进推理;(b) llm增强的KG,其中llm改进了KG的构建、推理和查询分辨率;(c)协同LLM-KG系统,可实现双向知识交流,以实现更强大的人工智能驱动决策。虽然这些模型在医疗诊断、个性化治疗和自动化知识发现方面提供了实质性的改进,但关键挑战仍然存在。必须解决数据异构、推理透明度、计算可扩展性和围绕患者数据的伦理考虑等问题,以实现实际临床应用。本文概述了未来的发展方向,包括跨领域知识整合、神经符号人工智能框架、可解释预测的因果推理以及用于自适应决策的多智能体集成模型。我们强调,可扩展性、实时KG更新和隐私保护机制对于负责任的、高影响力的AI在医学中的部署至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1151
期刊介绍: IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics publishes original papers presenting recent advances where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences, and biomedicine. Topics include acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, and analysis of biomedical and health information. The journal covers applications of information technologies in healthcare, patient monitoring, preventive care, early disease diagnosis, therapy discovery, and personalized treatment protocols. It explores electronic medical and health records, clinical information systems, decision support systems, medical and biological imaging informatics, wearable systems, body area/sensor networks, and more. Integration-related topics like interoperability, evidence-based medicine, and secure patient data are also addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书