Clinical Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing-Guided Targeted Therapies in Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
F Kazmi, R Katyal, T F D Liu, P Gkogkou, S P Blagden, S Lord, D Dodwell, N Shrestha
{"title":"Clinical Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing-Guided Targeted Therapies in Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"F Kazmi, R Katyal, T F D Liu, P Gkogkou, S P Blagden, S Lord, D Dodwell, N Shrestha","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2025.103943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Precision oncology, driven by next-generation sequencing (NGS), enables the use of matched targeted therapies (MTTs) tailored to tumour-specific genomic alterations. While benefits in early-stage cancer are well-established, the impact of MTTs in relapsed or metastatic settings remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023471466) evaluates the efficacy and safety of NGS-guided MTTs in patients with advanced solid and haematological tumours.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE (to 30 October 2024), reference lists, and conference proceedings identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NGS-guided MTTs (alone or combined with standard of care systemic treatment [SOC]) versus SOC alone in patients with advanced cancers that had progressed after at least one prior systemic therapy. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 adverse events. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty RCTs (7393 patients) were included that collectively enrolled patients with eight different cancer types. With a median follow-up ranging from 12 months to 62.3 months, MTTs were associated with a 30-40% reduction in the risk of disease progression. No consistent OS benefit was observed with MTT monotherapy. However, combining MTTs with SOC resulted in improved OS, particularly in patients with prostate and urothelial cancer, but conferred PFS gain without OS improvement in those with breast and ovarian cancer. In terms of adverse events, we observed MTTs increased toxicity risk compared to SOC, specifically, in combination regimens. Most studies were at high risk of bias, with performance and detection bias being common limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NGS-guided MTTs significantly enhance PFS, especially when combined with SOC, with OS benefits being more tumour-specific. Increased toxicity rates with MTTs underscore the need for careful in patient selection. Furthermore, genomic profiling should be routinely integrated into the management of patients with advanced or recurrent cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"48 ","pages":"103943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2025.103943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Precision oncology, driven by next-generation sequencing (NGS), enables the use of matched targeted therapies (MTTs) tailored to tumour-specific genomic alterations. While benefits in early-stage cancer are well-established, the impact of MTTs in relapsed or metastatic settings remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023471466) evaluates the efficacy and safety of NGS-guided MTTs in patients with advanced solid and haematological tumours.

Materials and methods: Searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE (to 30 October 2024), reference lists, and conference proceedings identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NGS-guided MTTs (alone or combined with standard of care systemic treatment [SOC]) versus SOC alone in patients with advanced cancers that had progressed after at least one prior systemic therapy. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 adverse events. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird method.

Results: Thirty RCTs (7393 patients) were included that collectively enrolled patients with eight different cancer types. With a median follow-up ranging from 12 months to 62.3 months, MTTs were associated with a 30-40% reduction in the risk of disease progression. No consistent OS benefit was observed with MTT monotherapy. However, combining MTTs with SOC resulted in improved OS, particularly in patients with prostate and urothelial cancer, but conferred PFS gain without OS improvement in those with breast and ovarian cancer. In terms of adverse events, we observed MTTs increased toxicity risk compared to SOC, specifically, in combination regimens. Most studies were at high risk of bias, with performance and detection bias being common limitations.

Conclusion: NGS-guided MTTs significantly enhance PFS, especially when combined with SOC, with OS benefits being more tumour-specific. Increased toxicity rates with MTTs underscore the need for careful in patient selection. Furthermore, genomic profiling should be routinely integrated into the management of patients with advanced or recurrent cancers.

新一代测序引导的靶向治疗对晚期癌症的临床影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:在下一代测序(NGS)的推动下,精确肿瘤学能够使用针对肿瘤特异性基因组改变的匹配靶向治疗(MTTs)。虽然对早期癌症的益处是公认的,但mtt对复发或转移性癌症的影响仍不清楚。这项系统综述和荟萃分析(PROSPERO ID: CRD42023471466)评估了ngs引导的mtt治疗晚期实体和血液肿瘤患者的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:检索CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE(至2024年10月30日),参考文献列表和会议记录,确定了随机对照试验(rct),比较ngs引导的MTTs(单独或联合标准护理系统治疗[SOC])与单独SOC在至少一次既往系统治疗后进展的晚期癌症患者中的疗效。主要结局是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和≥3级不良事件。数据提取和偏倚评估由两名审稿人独立进行。随机效应荟萃分析采用dersimonan - laird方法。结果:共纳入30项随机对照试验(7393例患者),共纳入8种不同癌症类型的患者。中位随访时间为12个月至62.3个月,mtt与疾病进展风险降低30-40%相关。MTT单药治疗未观察到一致的OS获益。然而,mtt联合SOC改善了OS,特别是前列腺癌和尿路上皮癌患者,但在乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者中,PFS增加而OS没有改善。在不良事件方面,我们观察到与SOC相比,mtt增加了毒性风险,特别是在联合方案中。大多数研究存在高偏倚风险,性能和检测偏倚是常见的局限性。结论:ngs引导的mtt可显著提高PFS,特别是与SOC联合使用时,OS获益更具肿瘤特异性。mtt的毒性增加强调了谨慎选择患者的必要性。此外,基因组分析应常规纳入晚期或复发癌症患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信