Empowering African professionals to assess palliative care development: regional application of the WHO framework.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fernanda Bastos, Vilma A Tripodoro, Alvaro Montero, Ana Cristina Béjar, Eduardo Garralda, Virginia Gathoni Gichuru, Anthelme Kouessi Agbodande, Eve Namisango, Emmanuel Luyirika, Carlos Centeno
{"title":"Empowering African professionals to assess palliative care development: regional application of the WHO framework.","authors":"Fernanda Bastos, Vilma A Tripodoro, Alvaro Montero, Ana Cristina Béjar, Eduardo Garralda, Virginia Gathoni Gichuru, Anthelme Kouessi Agbodande, Eve Namisango, Emmanuel Luyirika, Carlos Centeno","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The WHO has proposed a structured framework to assess palliative care development through 14 actionable indicators across 6 dimensions. While prior applications have been limited to individual countries, this study explores the feasibility of empowering professionals across an entire region to independently evaluate palliative care development using the WHO framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert-informed, participatory implementation study was conducted across the African continent. A structured survey based on the WHO indicators was developed and translated into multiple languages. A regional network of national consultants was established, and participants were trained through an asynchronous, tutored online course. Data collection involved self-assessment of national palliative care development, accompanied by narrative justifications and documentary evidence. Validation processes included peer review and, where feasible, endorsement by national associations or authorities. Empowerment was assessed through course completion, perceived impact via post-course surveys and participation in data validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>National-level data from 50 African countries were included, based on 121 contributors. Most countries had at least two contributors, ensuring data triangulation. Validation processes were completed in 48 countries, with 21 reports endorsed by national associations or authorities. Post-course surveys indicated that 91% of respondents rated the course highly for professional value, and 95% expressed interest in ongoing collaboration. The data collected are already informing global comparative analyses, including the African Palliative Care Atlas (2025 edition).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that with appropriate training and support, professionals across an entire region can independently assess palliative care development using the WHO framework. The approach fosters professional empowerment and provides high-quality, context-rich data, laying the groundwork for similar initiatives in other regions and contributing to a coordinated global assessment of palliative care development.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The WHO has proposed a structured framework to assess palliative care development through 14 actionable indicators across 6 dimensions. While prior applications have been limited to individual countries, this study explores the feasibility of empowering professionals across an entire region to independently evaluate palliative care development using the WHO framework.

Methods: An expert-informed, participatory implementation study was conducted across the African continent. A structured survey based on the WHO indicators was developed and translated into multiple languages. A regional network of national consultants was established, and participants were trained through an asynchronous, tutored online course. Data collection involved self-assessment of national palliative care development, accompanied by narrative justifications and documentary evidence. Validation processes included peer review and, where feasible, endorsement by national associations or authorities. Empowerment was assessed through course completion, perceived impact via post-course surveys and participation in data validation.

Results: National-level data from 50 African countries were included, based on 121 contributors. Most countries had at least two contributors, ensuring data triangulation. Validation processes were completed in 48 countries, with 21 reports endorsed by national associations or authorities. Post-course surveys indicated that 91% of respondents rated the course highly for professional value, and 95% expressed interest in ongoing collaboration. The data collected are already informing global comparative analyses, including the African Palliative Care Atlas (2025 edition).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that with appropriate training and support, professionals across an entire region can independently assess palliative care development using the WHO framework. The approach fosters professional empowerment and provides high-quality, context-rich data, laying the groundwork for similar initiatives in other regions and contributing to a coordinated global assessment of palliative care development.

Abstract Image

授权非洲专业人员评估姑息治疗发展:世卫组织框架的区域应用。
世卫组织提出了一个结构化框架,通过6个方面的14个可操作指标来评估姑息治疗的发展。虽然以前的应用仅限于个别国家,但本研究探讨了授权整个区域的专业人员使用世卫组织框架独立评估姑息治疗发展的可行性。方法:在整个非洲大陆进行了一项专家知情的参与式实施研究。根据世卫组织指标制定了一项结构化调查,并翻译成多种语言。建立了一个国家顾问区域网络,并通过非同步辅导的在线课程对与会者进行培训。数据收集涉及国家姑息治疗发展的自我评估,并附有叙述理由和书面证据。验证过程包括同行评审,并在可行的情况下得到国家协会或当局的认可。通过课程完成、课程后调查和参与数据验证来评估赋权。结果:包括来自50个非洲国家的国家级数据,基于121个贡献者。大多数国家至少有两个捐助国,以确保数据三角化。48个国家完成了验证过程,其中21份报告得到了国家协会或当局的认可。课程结束后的调查显示,91%的受访者对课程的专业价值评价很高,95%的受访者表示有兴趣继续合作。收集的数据已经为全球比较分析提供了信息,包括《非洲姑息治疗地图集》(2025年版)。结论:本研究表明,通过适当的培训和支持,整个地区的专业人员可以使用世卫组织框架独立评估姑息治疗发展情况。该方法促进了专业赋权,提供了高质量、背景丰富的数据,为其他区域的类似举措奠定了基础,并有助于对姑息治疗发展进行协调一致的全球评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信