Multidimensional cognitive deficits in the typical and atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shalom K Henderson, Alexander G Murley, Thomas E Cope, Lucy Bowns, Maura Malpetti, Karalyn E Patterson, James B Rowe, Matthew A Lambon Ralph
{"title":"Multidimensional cognitive deficits in the typical and atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Shalom K Henderson, Alexander G Murley, Thomas E Cope, Lucy Bowns, Maura Malpetti, Karalyn E Patterson, James B Rowe, Matthew A Lambon Ralph","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01873-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this two-part investigation, we examined whether Alzheimer's disease (AD) phenotypes are distinct clinical entities or represent positions within a graded multidimensional space.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, using a large retrospective dataset of past research participants (n = 413) from memory clinics, we examined the comparative distributions of cognitive performance in people diagnosed with typical amnestic AD (tAD), logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), across a broad range of disease severities. Secondly, a prospective deep phenotyping study of lvPPA (n = 18) compared to typical AD (n = 9) addressed the following questions: (1) Does the multidimensional cognitive pattern of impairment only emerge in advanced lvPPA, and how does it compare to tAD? (2) Do memory deficits in lvPPA appear in a simple clinic-level cognitive assessment or require in-depth neuropsychological investigation? (3) To what extent is performance on verbal episodic memory attributable to language impairment? (4) Do the patterns of decline in lvPPA and tAD stay categorical or multidimensional over time? We explored the associations between scores derived from a principal component analysis of cognitive measures, and grey matter volumes in key memory- and language-related brain regions, at baseline and longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinic-level assessment revealed similar results in both the prospective and retrospective data: (i) patients showed graded distinctions (e.g., predominant visual versus language impairment in people with PCA versus lvPPA) and overlap (e.g., shared weakness in domains such as memory); and (ii) people with lvPPA and tAD were equally impaired on both verbal and non-verbal memory tests. Longitudinal assessment showed phenotypic dispersion: (i) people with tAD showed varied patterns of phenotypic differentiation; and (ii) people with lvPPA and lvPPA + exhibited a multidimensional pattern of decline with decreasing principal component scores and worsening multi-domain cognitive performance. The results of Bayesian linear regressions showed evidence for the association of grey matter volumes in language and memory networks with principal component analysis derived scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The graded distinctions amongst typical amnestic and atypical (language and visual) phenotypes of AD support the proposal for a transdiagnostic, multidimensional phenotype geometry that spans all AD subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"226"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12532852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01873-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this two-part investigation, we examined whether Alzheimer's disease (AD) phenotypes are distinct clinical entities or represent positions within a graded multidimensional space.

Methods: First, using a large retrospective dataset of past research participants (n = 413) from memory clinics, we examined the comparative distributions of cognitive performance in people diagnosed with typical amnestic AD (tAD), logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), across a broad range of disease severities. Secondly, a prospective deep phenotyping study of lvPPA (n = 18) compared to typical AD (n = 9) addressed the following questions: (1) Does the multidimensional cognitive pattern of impairment only emerge in advanced lvPPA, and how does it compare to tAD? (2) Do memory deficits in lvPPA appear in a simple clinic-level cognitive assessment or require in-depth neuropsychological investigation? (3) To what extent is performance on verbal episodic memory attributable to language impairment? (4) Do the patterns of decline in lvPPA and tAD stay categorical or multidimensional over time? We explored the associations between scores derived from a principal component analysis of cognitive measures, and grey matter volumes in key memory- and language-related brain regions, at baseline and longitudinally.

Results: The clinic-level assessment revealed similar results in both the prospective and retrospective data: (i) patients showed graded distinctions (e.g., predominant visual versus language impairment in people with PCA versus lvPPA) and overlap (e.g., shared weakness in domains such as memory); and (ii) people with lvPPA and tAD were equally impaired on both verbal and non-verbal memory tests. Longitudinal assessment showed phenotypic dispersion: (i) people with tAD showed varied patterns of phenotypic differentiation; and (ii) people with lvPPA and lvPPA + exhibited a multidimensional pattern of decline with decreasing principal component scores and worsening multi-domain cognitive performance. The results of Bayesian linear regressions showed evidence for the association of grey matter volumes in language and memory networks with principal component analysis derived scores.

Conclusions: The graded distinctions amongst typical amnestic and atypical (language and visual) phenotypes of AD support the proposal for a transdiagnostic, multidimensional phenotype geometry that spans all AD subtypes.

阿尔茨海默病的典型和非典型变体的多维认知缺陷。
背景:在这个由两部分组成的研究中,我们研究了阿尔茨海默病(AD)的表型是不同的临床实体还是在一个分级的多维空间中代表位置。方法:首先,使用来自记忆诊所的大型回顾性研究参与者数据集(n = 413),我们检查了诊断为典型遗忘性AD (tAD),原发性进行性失语症(lvPPA)的logopenic变体和后皮质萎缩(PCA)的患者的认知表现的比较分布,跨越了广泛的疾病严重程度。其次,与典型AD (n = 9)相比,lvPPA (n = 18)的前瞻性深度表型研究解决了以下问题:(1)多维认知障碍模式是否仅在晚期lvPPA中出现,与tAD相比如何?(2) lvPPA患者的记忆缺陷是出现在简单的临床水平认知评估中,还是需要深入的神经心理学研究?(3)言语情景记忆的表现在多大程度上可归因于语言障碍?(4)随着时间的推移,lvPPA和tAD的下降模式是单一的还是多维的?我们在基线和纵向上探索了从认知测量的主成分分析得出的分数与关键记忆和语言相关大脑区域的灰质体积之间的联系。结果:临床水平的评估在前瞻性和回顾性数据中显示出相似的结果:(i)患者表现出分级差异(例如,PCA患者与lvPPA患者的主要视觉障碍与语言障碍)和重叠(例如,记忆等领域的共同弱点);(ii) lvPPA和tAD患者在言语和非言语记忆测试中的受损程度相同。纵向评估显示表型分散:(1)tAD患者表现出不同的表型分化模式;(ii) lvPPA和lvPPA +患者表现出多维度的下降模式,主成分得分下降,多领域认知表现恶化。贝叶斯线性回归的结果显示了语言和记忆网络灰质体积与主成分分析衍生分数之间的关联。结论:AD的典型健忘和非典型(语言和视觉)表型之间的分级差异支持了跨诊断、多维表型几何的建议,该几何可涵盖所有AD亚型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信