Musculoskeletal trauma rehabilitation: a global comparison.

Brian Bernstein, Douglas W Lundy, Theodore A Miclau, Zsolt J Balogh, Shimpei Kitada, Ross Leighton, Guy Putzeys, Luis G Padilla Rojas, Inger Schipper, Linda Vallejo, Jonathan Tamayo-Cosio, Dario E Garin Zertuche, Cristian A Rojas Herrera, José Octavio Soarez Hungria, Jaime A Leal Camacho, Marcelo T Caiero, Horacio Tabares Neyra, Vincenzo Giordano, Hans-Christoph Pape, Theodore Miclau
{"title":"Musculoskeletal trauma rehabilitation: a global comparison.","authors":"Brian Bernstein, Douglas W Lundy, Theodore A Miclau, Zsolt J Balogh, Shimpei Kitada, Ross Leighton, Guy Putzeys, Luis G Padilla Rojas, Inger Schipper, Linda Vallejo, Jonathan Tamayo-Cosio, Dario E Garin Zertuche, Cristian A Rojas Herrera, José Octavio Soarez Hungria, Jaime A Leal Camacho, Marcelo T Caiero, Horacio Tabares Neyra, Vincenzo Giordano, Hans-Christoph Pape, Theodore Miclau","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rehabilitation after musculoskeletal trauma is globally acknowledged as essential for restoring function and improving quality of life; however, significant variation exists in rehabilitation frameworks and services worldwide. Although certain principles-such as early intervention, structured care pathways, and multidisciplinary approaches-are universally recognized as important determinants of outcomes in trauma patients, their implementation and effectiveness vary considerably due to differences in health care infrastructure, economic resources, policy frameworks, and cultural contexts. Drawing on comparative analyses of rehabilitation frameworks across regions, including North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Africa, this paper identifies structural variations, systemic challenges, and innovations that can inform global rehabilitation efforts. Strategic international collaboration focusing on shared learning, standardized protocols, technology integration, and targeted investments is key to creating equitable and sustainable rehabilitation models, especially in resource-limited settings and aging populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"8 6 Suppl","pages":"e437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rehabilitation after musculoskeletal trauma is globally acknowledged as essential for restoring function and improving quality of life; however, significant variation exists in rehabilitation frameworks and services worldwide. Although certain principles-such as early intervention, structured care pathways, and multidisciplinary approaches-are universally recognized as important determinants of outcomes in trauma patients, their implementation and effectiveness vary considerably due to differences in health care infrastructure, economic resources, policy frameworks, and cultural contexts. Drawing on comparative analyses of rehabilitation frameworks across regions, including North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Africa, this paper identifies structural variations, systemic challenges, and innovations that can inform global rehabilitation efforts. Strategic international collaboration focusing on shared learning, standardized protocols, technology integration, and targeted investments is key to creating equitable and sustainable rehabilitation models, especially in resource-limited settings and aging populations.

肌肉骨骼创伤康复:全球比较。
肌肉骨骼创伤后的康复是全球公认的恢复功能和提高生活质量的必要条件;然而,世界各地的康复框架和服务存在很大差异。尽管某些原则——如早期干预、结构化护理路径和多学科方法——被普遍认为是创伤患者预后的重要决定因素,但由于卫生保健基础设施、经济资源、政策框架和文化背景的差异,这些原则的实施和有效性存在很大差异。通过对包括北美、拉丁美洲、欧洲、亚太和非洲在内的各地区康复框架的比较分析,本文确定了可以为全球康复工作提供信息的结构变化、系统性挑战和创新。以共享学习、标准化协议、技术整合和有针对性的投资为重点的战略性国际合作是创建公平和可持续的康复模式的关键,特别是在资源有限的环境和人口老龄化的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书