Validity and transferability of Model for ASsessing the value of Artificial Intelligence (MAS-AI).

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Iben Fasterholdt, Julie S Schrøder, Linda H Hansen, James M Bowen, Anne Gerdes, Kristian Kidholm, Tudor M Haja, Francesco Calabrò, Rossana Cecchi, Alexandra Stanimirovic, Troy Francis, Valeria E Rac, Benjamin S B Rasmussen
{"title":"Validity and transferability of Model for ASsessing the value of Artificial Intelligence (MAS-AI).","authors":"Iben Fasterholdt, Julie S Schrøder, Linda H Hansen, James M Bowen, Anne Gerdes, Kristian Kidholm, Tudor M Haja, Francesco Calabrò, Rossana Cecchi, Alexandra Stanimirovic, Troy Francis, Valeria E Rac, Benjamin S B Rasmussen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2022, a multidisciplinary group of experts and patients published a Model for ASsessing the value of AI (MAS-AI) in medical imaging. MAS-AI is a critical tool for decision-makers, enabling them to make informed choices on the prioritization of AI solutions. The objective of this study was to assess the face validity and transferability of MAS-AI by investigating workshop participants' perceptions in Denmark, Italy, and Canada regarding the importance of its content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi process was conducted, including inputs from four workshops with a sample of decision makers from hospitals or the healthcare sector, patient partners and various researchers and experts. The participants were asked to rate the importance of each of the domains and subtopics in MAS-AI on a 0-3 Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 participants from three countries participated. The face validity of all MAS-AI domains was confirmed by Denmark, Canada, and Italy, with over 70 percent of the respondents in the first round rating the domains as moderately or highly important. Overall, the five process factors were considered moderately or highly important by between 93 percent and 87 percent of the respondents. All the individual subtopics under each domain were rated above the 70 percent cut-off, except five subtopics for Italy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study confirmed the validity of the MAS-AI domains in Denmark, Canada, and Italy. Several improvements in study design and data collection were identified. In the future, analyzing participants to understand which items were rated as important by whom could provide valuable insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"206 ","pages":"106127"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In 2022, a multidisciplinary group of experts and patients published a Model for ASsessing the value of AI (MAS-AI) in medical imaging. MAS-AI is a critical tool for decision-makers, enabling them to make informed choices on the prioritization of AI solutions. The objective of this study was to assess the face validity and transferability of MAS-AI by investigating workshop participants' perceptions in Denmark, Italy, and Canada regarding the importance of its content.

Methods: A Delphi process was conducted, including inputs from four workshops with a sample of decision makers from hospitals or the healthcare sector, patient partners and various researchers and experts. The participants were asked to rate the importance of each of the domains and subtopics in MAS-AI on a 0-3 Likert scale.

Results: A total of 95 participants from three countries participated. The face validity of all MAS-AI domains was confirmed by Denmark, Canada, and Italy, with over 70 percent of the respondents in the first round rating the domains as moderately or highly important. Overall, the five process factors were considered moderately or highly important by between 93 percent and 87 percent of the respondents. All the individual subtopics under each domain were rated above the 70 percent cut-off, except five subtopics for Italy.

Conclusions: The study confirmed the validity of the MAS-AI domains in Denmark, Canada, and Italy. Several improvements in study design and data collection were identified. In the future, analyzing participants to understand which items were rated as important by whom could provide valuable insights.

人工智能价值评估模型(MAS-AI)的有效性和可移植性
目标:2022年,一个由多学科专家和患者组成的小组发表了《人工智能在医学成像中的价值评估模型》(MAS-AI)。MAS-AI是决策者的重要工具,使他们能够就人工智能解决方案的优先顺序做出明智的选择。本研究的目的是通过调查丹麦、意大利和加拿大研讨会参与者对MAS-AI内容重要性的看法,评估MAS-AI的面部效度和可转移性。方法:采用德尔菲法,对医院或医疗保健部门的决策者、患者合作伙伴和各种研究人员和专家进行了四个讲习班的调查。参与者被要求在0-3的李克特量表上对MAS-AI中每个领域和子主题的重要性进行评分。结果:共有来自三个国家的95名参与者参与。丹麦、加拿大和意大利确认了所有MAS-AI域的表面有效性,超过70%的受访者在第一轮中将这些域评为中等或高度重要。总的来说,93%到87%的受访者认为这五个过程因素是中等或高度重要的。除了意大利的五个子主题外,每个域名下的所有子主题的评分都在70%以上。结论:该研究证实了MAS-AI域在丹麦、加拿大和意大利的有效性。确定了研究设计和数据收集方面的若干改进。在未来,分析参与者来了解哪些项目被谁评为重要,可以提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信