Evaluating ambient artificial intelligence documentation: effects on work efficiency, documentation burden, and patient-centered care.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yawen Guo, Jiayuan Wang, Di Hu, Steven Tam, Charles Gilman, Emilie Chow, Danielle Perret, Deepti Pandita, Kai Zheng
{"title":"Evaluating ambient artificial intelligence documentation: effects on work efficiency, documentation burden, and patient-centered care.","authors":"Yawen Guo, Jiayuan Wang, Di Hu, Steven Tam, Charles Gilman, Emilie Chow, Danielle Perret, Deepti Pandita, Kai Zheng","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and significance: </strong>Ambient listening tools powered by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) offer real-time, scribe-like support that reduce documentation burden and may help alleviate burnout. This study assesses physician-perceived benefits and challenges of ambient AI implementation through surveys and evaluates its effectiveness in clinical workflows using automatically recorded electronic health record (EHR) time-efficiency metrics.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>A quality improvement pilot has been underway at UCI Health since December 2023. Epic EHR Signal metrics were analyzed to assess changes in note length, documentation time, and same-day encounter closure rates. Matched pre- and post-implementation surveys evaluated physician-perceived changes in documentation burden, clinical efficiency, and care quality. We also examined open-ended survey responses using thematic analysis to supplement quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis on EHR usage data from 167 physicians showed significant reductions in note-writing time, despite an increase in note length. Survey responses (n = 65) also indicated statistically significant improvements across multiple domains. Physicians reported reduced cognitive demand (P = .031) and documentation effort (P = .014), alongside perceptions of enhanced clinical efficiency, patient-centered care, and EHR system usability. Thematic analysis confirmed these quantitative findings and identified opportunities for improvement, including specialty-specific customization and expanded AI functionality.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Ambient AI tools demonstrated improved documentation efficiency, perceived care quality, and reduced cognitive workload. These benefits suggest potential to alleviate key burdens in clinical documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future development should prioritize customization for specialty-specific and individual physician needs, ensure the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated content, and integrate ethical and legal considerations to facilitate safe and scalable implementation in patient-centered care contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and significance: Ambient listening tools powered by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) offer real-time, scribe-like support that reduce documentation burden and may help alleviate burnout. This study assesses physician-perceived benefits and challenges of ambient AI implementation through surveys and evaluates its effectiveness in clinical workflows using automatically recorded electronic health record (EHR) time-efficiency metrics.

Method and materials: A quality improvement pilot has been underway at UCI Health since December 2023. Epic EHR Signal metrics were analyzed to assess changes in note length, documentation time, and same-day encounter closure rates. Matched pre- and post-implementation surveys evaluated physician-perceived changes in documentation burden, clinical efficiency, and care quality. We also examined open-ended survey responses using thematic analysis to supplement quantitative findings.

Results: Analysis on EHR usage data from 167 physicians showed significant reductions in note-writing time, despite an increase in note length. Survey responses (n = 65) also indicated statistically significant improvements across multiple domains. Physicians reported reduced cognitive demand (P = .031) and documentation effort (P = .014), alongside perceptions of enhanced clinical efficiency, patient-centered care, and EHR system usability. Thematic analysis confirmed these quantitative findings and identified opportunities for improvement, including specialty-specific customization and expanded AI functionality.

Discussion: Ambient AI tools demonstrated improved documentation efficiency, perceived care quality, and reduced cognitive workload. These benefits suggest potential to alleviate key burdens in clinical documentation.

Conclusion: Future development should prioritize customization for specialty-specific and individual physician needs, ensure the reliability and accuracy of AI-generated content, and integrate ethical and legal considerations to facilitate safe and scalable implementation in patient-centered care contexts.

评估环境人工智能文档:对工作效率、文档负担和以患者为中心的护理的影响。
背景和意义:由生成式人工智能(GenAI)驱动的环境监听工具提供实时的、类似抄写的支持,可以减轻文档负担,并有助于缓解倦怠。本研究通过调查评估了医生对环境人工智能实施的好处和挑战,并使用自动记录的电子健康记录(EHR)时间效率指标评估了其在临床工作流程中的有效性。方法和材料:自2023年12月以来,UCI健康中心一直在进行质量改进试点。对Epic EHR Signal指标进行分析,以评估记录长度、记录时间和当日就诊结束率的变化。匹配的实施前后调查评估了医生在文件负担、临床效率和护理质量方面的感知变化。我们还使用主题分析来检验开放式调查反馈,以补充定量结果。结果:对167名医生的电子病历使用数据的分析显示,尽管笔记长度增加,但写笔记的时间显著减少。调查回复(n = 65)也表明在多个领域有统计学上显著的改善。医生报告认知需求减少(P = 0.031),记录工作减少(P = 0.031)。014),以及对提高临床效率、以患者为中心的护理和电子病历系统可用性的看法。专题分析证实了这些定量的发现,并确定了改进的机会,包括特定的定制和扩展的AI功能。讨论:环境人工智能工具证明了提高文档效率、感知护理质量和减少认知工作量。这些益处表明有可能减轻临床文件中的关键负担。结论:未来的发展应优先考虑针对专科和个体医生需求的定制,确保人工智能生成内容的可靠性和准确性,并整合伦理和法律方面的考虑,以促进在以患者为中心的医疗环境中安全、可扩展地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信