The Knowledge of Neglect: Reflections of Mothers Experiencing Homelessness in Dublin on Social Care Interventions Involving Their Children.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Culture Medicine and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-16 DOI:10.1007/s11013-025-09947-y
Hannah Lucey
{"title":"The Knowledge of Neglect: Reflections of Mothers Experiencing Homelessness in Dublin on Social Care Interventions Involving Their Children.","authors":"Hannah Lucey","doi":"10.1007/s11013-025-09947-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines the reflections on caregiving provided by a group of Irish mothers who were homeless, struggling with addiction, and had lost primary custody of their children. Drawing on Das's (Slum acts. Polity Press, Cambridge, 2022) discussion of 'inordinate knowledge', or knowledge of real-life and morally dubious scenarios that resist attempts at resolution through philosophical reasoning, the paper explores how women in these situations grappled with the realisation of having neglected their children. I demonstrate my interlocutors' ongoing ethical self-evaluations and continued attempts to make amends for their earlier caregiving lapses, with the limited resources at their disposal. In so doing, I demonstrate how my interlocutors' yearning towards their children, as revealed through the process of reflexive caregiving action, became entwined with their trajectories through homelessness and addiction in Dublin. At the same time, I probe the limits of anthropologists' proclivity for contextualising and rationalising unsettling caregiving behaviours. Instead, inspired by my interlocutors' unflinching self-evaluation, this paper explores the moral quandaries which emerge as a result of care's polyvalent nature by asking if we can ever reconcile a mother's attempt to atone for her faltering engagement with caregiving with her child's experience of neglect.</p>","PeriodicalId":47634,"journal":{"name":"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1437-1454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12745299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Medicine and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-025-09947-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the reflections on caregiving provided by a group of Irish mothers who were homeless, struggling with addiction, and had lost primary custody of their children. Drawing on Das's (Slum acts. Polity Press, Cambridge, 2022) discussion of 'inordinate knowledge', or knowledge of real-life and morally dubious scenarios that resist attempts at resolution through philosophical reasoning, the paper explores how women in these situations grappled with the realisation of having neglected their children. I demonstrate my interlocutors' ongoing ethical self-evaluations and continued attempts to make amends for their earlier caregiving lapses, with the limited resources at their disposal. In so doing, I demonstrate how my interlocutors' yearning towards their children, as revealed through the process of reflexive caregiving action, became entwined with their trajectories through homelessness and addiction in Dublin. At the same time, I probe the limits of anthropologists' proclivity for contextualising and rationalising unsettling caregiving behaviours. Instead, inspired by my interlocutors' unflinching self-evaluation, this paper explores the moral quandaries which emerge as a result of care's polyvalent nature by asking if we can ever reconcile a mother's attempt to atone for her faltering engagement with caregiving with her child's experience of neglect.

忽视的知识:都柏林经历无家可归的母亲对涉及其子女的社会关怀干预的反思。
本文考察了一群无家可归的爱尔兰母亲对看护的反思,他们与成瘾作斗争,并失去了对孩子的主要监护权。借鉴达斯的贫民窟行为。Polity Press, Cambridge, 2022)讨论了“过度知识”,或对现实生活和道德上可疑的场景的知识,这些场景抵制通过哲学推理来解决的尝试,本文探讨了在这些情况下女性如何应对忽视孩子的现实。我展示了我的对话者正在进行的道德自我评估,并继续尝试弥补他们之前的照顾失误,利用他们有限的资源。在这样做的过程中,我展示了我的对话者对他们的孩子的渴望,通过反身性的照顾行动的过程显示出来,与他们在都柏林无家可归和吸毒的轨迹交织在一起。与此同时,我还探讨了人类学家倾向于将令人不安的照料行为置于情境化和合理化的局限性。相反,受我的对话者毫不退缩的自我评价的启发,本文探讨了由于照顾的多价性而出现的道德困境,并提出了一个问题,即我们是否能够调和一位母亲试图弥补她对照顾的犹豫不决与她的孩子被忽视的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry is an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication of work in three interrelated fields: medical and psychiatric anthropology, cross-cultural psychiatry, and related cross-societal and clinical epidemiological studies. The journal publishes original research, and theoretical papers based on original research, on all subjects in each of these fields. Interdisciplinary work which bridges anthropological and medical perspectives and methods which are clinically relevant are particularly welcome, as is research on the cultural context of normative and deviant behavior, including the anthropological, epidemiological and clinical aspects of the subject. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry also fosters systematic and wide-ranging examinations of the significance of culture in health care, including comparisons of how the concept of culture is operationalized in anthropological and medical disciplines. With the increasing emphasis on the cultural diversity of society, which finds its reflection in many facets of our day to day life, including health care, Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry is required reading in anthropology, psychiatry and general health care libraries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书