Sean R Zion, Alexandra K Zaleta, Shauna McManus, Melissa A Boswell, Lauren C Heathcote, Carol S Dweck, Alia J Crum
{"title":"Illness mindsets in health and disease: development and validation of the Illness Mindset Inventory (IMI).","authors":"Sean R Zion, Alexandra K Zaleta, Shauna McManus, Melissa A Boswell, Lauren C Heathcote, Carol S Dweck, Alia J Crum","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00601-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Being diagnosed with a chronic illness is a life-altering experience that can be shaped, for better or worse, by psychological factors. How patients think about their illness-their core beliefs about what it means and what it might bring such as whether it is catastrophic, manageable, or even an opportunity-can influence how they respond and adapt. This research introduces the concept of illness mindsets and presents the initial validation of the Illness Mindset Inventory (IMI), a new tool designed to assess these beliefs and their implications for health and well-being. Study 1 examines the factor structure, internal reliability, and discriminant validity of the 9-item IMI in N = 201 healthy participants and N = 200 participants with cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and/or chronic pain. Study 2 investigates cancer patients (N = 463) with different degrees of illness severity and tests the pre-registered hypothesis that the IMI will account for variability in functioning over and above measures of illness severity. In Study 1, illness mindsets were associated with between 5.7 and 12.1% additional variance in physical, social, and emotional functioning, above and beyond disease status. In Study 2, illness mindsets accounted for between 6.9 and 12.0% additional variance in physical functioning, social functioning, and emotional distress in people diagnosed with cancer above and beyond cancer stage, cancer status, trait optimism, and self-efficacy. Illness mindsets may help account for variance in individual functioning beyond disease status and disease severity. Future research can probe the IMI's utility in supporting patient care; in predicting functioning before, during, and after a diagnosis; and as a potential target for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00601-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Being diagnosed with a chronic illness is a life-altering experience that can be shaped, for better or worse, by psychological factors. How patients think about their illness-their core beliefs about what it means and what it might bring such as whether it is catastrophic, manageable, or even an opportunity-can influence how they respond and adapt. This research introduces the concept of illness mindsets and presents the initial validation of the Illness Mindset Inventory (IMI), a new tool designed to assess these beliefs and their implications for health and well-being. Study 1 examines the factor structure, internal reliability, and discriminant validity of the 9-item IMI in N = 201 healthy participants and N = 200 participants with cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and/or chronic pain. Study 2 investigates cancer patients (N = 463) with different degrees of illness severity and tests the pre-registered hypothesis that the IMI will account for variability in functioning over and above measures of illness severity. In Study 1, illness mindsets were associated with between 5.7 and 12.1% additional variance in physical, social, and emotional functioning, above and beyond disease status. In Study 2, illness mindsets accounted for between 6.9 and 12.0% additional variance in physical functioning, social functioning, and emotional distress in people diagnosed with cancer above and beyond cancer stage, cancer status, trait optimism, and self-efficacy. Illness mindsets may help account for variance in individual functioning beyond disease status and disease severity. Future research can probe the IMI's utility in supporting patient care; in predicting functioning before, during, and after a diagnosis; and as a potential target for intervention.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders. Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.