Identification of biomarkers in gynecologic cancers: a machine learning approach for metabolomics.

IF 2.4 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI:10.12793/tcp.2025.33.e15
SangHun Cha, Sang-Min Lee, Kyeong Eun Lee, Min-Gul Kim, Sun-Young Lee, Kwang-Hee Shin
{"title":"Identification of biomarkers in gynecologic cancers: a machine learning approach for metabolomics.","authors":"SangHun Cha, Sang-Min Lee, Kyeong Eun Lee, Min-Gul Kim, Sun-Young Lee, Kwang-Hee Shin","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2025.33.e15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to identify the clinical metabolic markers associated with gynecologic cancer (GC) by comparing machine learning (ML) algorithms with orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Untargeted metabolomic analysis was performed on plasma from 42 patients with GC (24 cervical cancer [CC], 9 endometrial cancer [EC], and 9 ovarian cancer [OC]) and 57 healthy female participants. GC and healthy control groups were classified using OPLS-DA and 8 ML algorithms. The ML algorithm with the best classification performance was used to assess CC, EC, and OC with healthy subjects, and metabolite candidates involved in each GC were selected. Upon comparing the classification model performance between the GC and control groups, random forest (RF) model displayed the best performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9999. The multi-classification RF model was established to distinguish all 4 groups and was achieved an AUC of 0.8351. The AUCs of the 3 GC subgroup assessment RF models comparing patients with CC, EC, and OC with healthy subjects were 0.9838, 0.7500, and 0.7321, respectively. Plasma concentrations of 2 identified metabolites significantly increased in patients with GCs. Several ML algorithms were used to distinguish GC, showed better performance than conventional OPLS-DA. Proline betaine and lysophosphatidyl ethanolamine (18:0/0:0) selected in RF models were suggested as metabolite candidates associated with GCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"33 3","pages":"168-182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2025.33.e15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the clinical metabolic markers associated with gynecologic cancer (GC) by comparing machine learning (ML) algorithms with orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Untargeted metabolomic analysis was performed on plasma from 42 patients with GC (24 cervical cancer [CC], 9 endometrial cancer [EC], and 9 ovarian cancer [OC]) and 57 healthy female participants. GC and healthy control groups were classified using OPLS-DA and 8 ML algorithms. The ML algorithm with the best classification performance was used to assess CC, EC, and OC with healthy subjects, and metabolite candidates involved in each GC were selected. Upon comparing the classification model performance between the GC and control groups, random forest (RF) model displayed the best performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9999. The multi-classification RF model was established to distinguish all 4 groups and was achieved an AUC of 0.8351. The AUCs of the 3 GC subgroup assessment RF models comparing patients with CC, EC, and OC with healthy subjects were 0.9838, 0.7500, and 0.7321, respectively. Plasma concentrations of 2 identified metabolites significantly increased in patients with GCs. Several ML algorithms were used to distinguish GC, showed better performance than conventional OPLS-DA. Proline betaine and lysophosphatidyl ethanolamine (18:0/0:0) selected in RF models were suggested as metabolite candidates associated with GCs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

妇科癌症生物标志物的鉴定:代谢组学的机器学习方法。
本研究旨在通过比较机器学习(ML)算法和正交偏最小二乘判别分析(OPLS-DA),识别与妇科癌症(GC)相关的临床代谢标志物。对42例胃癌患者(宫颈癌[CC] 24例,子宫内膜癌[EC] 9例,卵巢癌[OC] 9例)和57名健康女性受试者的血浆进行非靶向代谢组学分析。采用OPLS-DA和8ml算法对GC组和健康对照组进行分类。使用分类性能最好的ML算法对健康受试者进行CC、EC和OC的评估,并选择涉及每种GC的代谢物候选物。对比GC组和对照组的分类模型性能,随机森林(random forest, RF)模型表现最佳,曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)为0.9999。建立多分类RF模型对4组进行区分,AUC为0.8351。CC、EC和OC患者与健康人的3个GC亚组评估RF模型的auc分别为0.9838、0.7500和0.7321。两种鉴定代谢物的血浆浓度在GCs患者中显著升高。采用了几种ML算法对GC进行识别,结果表明其性能优于传统的OPLS-DA算法。在RF模型中选择的脯氨酸甜菜碱和溶血磷脂酰乙醇胺(18:0/0:0)被认为是与gc相关的代谢物候选物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书