Victoria Yin, Tsehay B Abebe, Li Ding, Scott M Atay, Takashi Harano, Anthony W Kim, Baddr A Shakhsheer, Sean C Wightman
{"title":"Obtaining day-of-surgery written surgical consent is associated with first-case delay.","authors":"Victoria Yin, Tsehay B Abebe, Li Ding, Scott M Atay, Takashi Harano, Anthony W Kim, Baddr A Shakhsheer, Sean C Wightman","doi":"10.1177/17504589251377667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relationship between consent signature timing and first-start case delay.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Consecutive first start patients who arrived on day-of-surgery from home at a single centre from 28 days in June 2021 were identified. First-case delay was defined as operating theatre (OT) in-room time greater than 5 minutes after scheduled start time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 289 patients were eligible for the study. Surgical consent signing in the preoperative area and non-English primary language were significantly associated with OT delay; 234 patients (81%) had signed surgical consent on the day of surgery in the preoperative area. Patients who signed surgical consent on day- of- surgery were 3.2 times as likely to experience OT in-room time delay compared to those who signed surgical consent prior to day of surgery, odds ratio (OR) 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2, 8.5, <i>p</i> = 0.02. Patients with non-English primary language had 3.8 times greater risk for case delay (OR 3.8, 95% CI: 2.0, 7.4, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Same day consent signing among patients arriving for surgery from home may cause significant operating theatre start time delays. In addition to ethical reasons, obtaining consent in the preoperative area should be avoided to improve preoperative efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"413-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589251377667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the relationship between consent signature timing and first-start case delay.
Study design: Consecutive first start patients who arrived on day-of-surgery from home at a single centre from 28 days in June 2021 were identified. First-case delay was defined as operating theatre (OT) in-room time greater than 5 minutes after scheduled start time.
Results: A total of 289 patients were eligible for the study. Surgical consent signing in the preoperative area and non-English primary language were significantly associated with OT delay; 234 patients (81%) had signed surgical consent on the day of surgery in the preoperative area. Patients who signed surgical consent on day- of- surgery were 3.2 times as likely to experience OT in-room time delay compared to those who signed surgical consent prior to day of surgery, odds ratio (OR) 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2, 8.5, p = 0.02. Patients with non-English primary language had 3.8 times greater risk for case delay (OR 3.8, 95% CI: 2.0, 7.4, p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Same day consent signing among patients arriving for surgery from home may cause significant operating theatre start time delays. In addition to ethical reasons, obtaining consent in the preoperative area should be avoided to improve preoperative efficiency.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.