David Schiff, Xiaobu Ye, Jing Li, Benjamin M Ellingson, Patrick Y Wen, Tobias Walbert, Jian Campian, L Burt Nabors, Byram H Ozer, Arati Desai, Antonio Omuro, Serena Desideri, Neeraja Danda, Stuart Grossman, Ranjit S Bindra
{"title":"Phase I/II and Window-of-Opportunity Study of Pamiparib and Metronomic Temozolomide for Recurrent IDH Mutant Gliomas.","authors":"David Schiff, Xiaobu Ye, Jing Li, Benjamin M Ellingson, Patrick Y Wen, Tobias Walbert, Jian Campian, L Burt Nabors, Byram H Ozer, Arati Desai, Antonio Omuro, Serena Desideri, Neeraja Danda, Stuart Grossman, Ranjit S Bindra","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noaf246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preclinical studies demonstrate activity of PARP inhibitors in IDH mutant gliomas. We investigated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of the PARP inhibitor pamiparib in conjunction with metronomic low-dose temozolomide in patients with recurrent IDH mutant (IDHmt) gliomas in a multicenter Phase I/II/window of opportunity study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients received pamiparib in conjunction with daily temozolomide. Following Phase I determination of MTD, we enrolled two patient cohorts (Arm A, multiple prior chemotherapy regimens; Arm B, single prior regimen) in a two-stage design. Exploratory cohorts examined grade 4 IDHmt patients and intratumoral pharmacokinetics of pamiparib. The primary endpoint was objective radiographic response (ORR) by RANO criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>66 subjects were enrolled. We established pamiparib 60 mg twice daily with temozolomide 20 mg daily as the phase II dose. In non-enhancing and enhancing tumor, pamiparib exhibited an unbound tumor/plasma ratio of 0.92 and 0.98 respectively. 0/15 Arm A and 1/24 Arm B patients achieved a centrally confirmed partial response. Median progression-free survival for Arm A was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1.2-14.8 months), and for Arm B 9.7 months (95% CI, 5.7-21.7 months). Grade 3+ anemia and neutropenia affected 24% and 33% of patients respectively. Twenty-two of 66 patients (33.3%) discontinued study treatment for reasons other than tumor progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pamiparib appeared to achieve sufficient pharmacologically active concentrations in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors. While some patients achieved prolonged progression-free survival, combination with temozolomide did not produce a meaningful ORR in IDHmt recurrent gliomas. Cumulative hematologic toxicity was substantial and impacted long-term tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf246","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Preclinical studies demonstrate activity of PARP inhibitors in IDH mutant gliomas. We investigated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of the PARP inhibitor pamiparib in conjunction with metronomic low-dose temozolomide in patients with recurrent IDH mutant (IDHmt) gliomas in a multicenter Phase I/II/window of opportunity study.
Methods: Patients received pamiparib in conjunction with daily temozolomide. Following Phase I determination of MTD, we enrolled two patient cohorts (Arm A, multiple prior chemotherapy regimens; Arm B, single prior regimen) in a two-stage design. Exploratory cohorts examined grade 4 IDHmt patients and intratumoral pharmacokinetics of pamiparib. The primary endpoint was objective radiographic response (ORR) by RANO criteria.
Results: 66 subjects were enrolled. We established pamiparib 60 mg twice daily with temozolomide 20 mg daily as the phase II dose. In non-enhancing and enhancing tumor, pamiparib exhibited an unbound tumor/plasma ratio of 0.92 and 0.98 respectively. 0/15 Arm A and 1/24 Arm B patients achieved a centrally confirmed partial response. Median progression-free survival for Arm A was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1.2-14.8 months), and for Arm B 9.7 months (95% CI, 5.7-21.7 months). Grade 3+ anemia and neutropenia affected 24% and 33% of patients respectively. Twenty-two of 66 patients (33.3%) discontinued study treatment for reasons other than tumor progression.
Conclusion: Pamiparib appeared to achieve sufficient pharmacologically active concentrations in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors. While some patients achieved prolonged progression-free survival, combination with temozolomide did not produce a meaningful ORR in IDHmt recurrent gliomas. Cumulative hematologic toxicity was substantial and impacted long-term tolerability.
期刊介绍:
Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field.
The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.