Aging Accelerates Degradation of Human Neuromuscular Junction Following Peripheral Nerve Injury.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1002/mus.70003
Luigi P Gonzales, Vivian Y Chen, Amanda Tedesco, Saman Andalib, Chris Lee, David J Wright, Tyler R Johnston, Tahseen Mozaffar, Oswald Steward, Ranjan Gupta
{"title":"Aging Accelerates Degradation of Human Neuromuscular Junction Following Peripheral Nerve Injury.","authors":"Luigi P Gonzales, Vivian Y Chen, Amanda Tedesco, Saman Andalib, Chris Lee, David J Wright, Tyler R Johnston, Tahseen Mozaffar, Oswald Steward, Ranjan Gupta","doi":"10.1002/mus.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Clinical observations indicate differences between young versus older adults in outcomes of peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Here, we present an analysis of motor endplates (MEPs) from normal and denervated deltoid muscle biopsies from young adult (≤ 60 years) and older (> 60 years) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Under an IRB-approved prospective cohort study protocol, 24 patients who underwent open surgery for either shoulder pathology or deltoid dysfunction secondary to axillary nerve injury, confirmed with electrodiagnostic studies, were evaluated. Deltoid muscle biopsies were procured at the time of surgery to assess MEP morphology and innervation status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the MEPs in denervated deltoid revealed no significant difference in the percentage of healthy (pretzel) versus unhealthy (intermediate/plaque) morphology between the young and older groups. However, there was a large difference between young versus old denervated deltoids in the percent of innervated MEPs. In young denervated muscle, an average of 48.61% (±12.40%) MEPs were innervated, while in older muscle samples an average of 24.78% (±5.83%) MEPs were innervated. Additionally, the older group had a faster initial rate of MEP nerve signal loss compared to the young group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study shows that age does affect the MEP response to injury. This effect is most significant in MEP innervation, with rapid loss of visible innervated terminals in the older group. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference in MEP morphology in the older patients, suggesting that early surgical intervention may still offer significant recovery potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":"72 5","pages":"1161-1167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Clinical observations indicate differences between young versus older adults in outcomes of peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Here, we present an analysis of motor endplates (MEPs) from normal and denervated deltoid muscle biopsies from young adult (≤ 60 years) and older (> 60 years) patients.

Methods: Under an IRB-approved prospective cohort study protocol, 24 patients who underwent open surgery for either shoulder pathology or deltoid dysfunction secondary to axillary nerve injury, confirmed with electrodiagnostic studies, were evaluated. Deltoid muscle biopsies were procured at the time of surgery to assess MEP morphology and innervation status.

Results: Analysis of the MEPs in denervated deltoid revealed no significant difference in the percentage of healthy (pretzel) versus unhealthy (intermediate/plaque) morphology between the young and older groups. However, there was a large difference between young versus old denervated deltoids in the percent of innervated MEPs. In young denervated muscle, an average of 48.61% (±12.40%) MEPs were innervated, while in older muscle samples an average of 24.78% (±5.83%) MEPs were innervated. Additionally, the older group had a faster initial rate of MEP nerve signal loss compared to the young group.

Discussion: Our study shows that age does affect the MEP response to injury. This effect is most significant in MEP innervation, with rapid loss of visible innervated terminals in the older group. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference in MEP morphology in the older patients, suggesting that early surgical intervention may still offer significant recovery potential.

衰老加速周围神经损伤后人类神经肌肉连接处的退化。
简介/目的:临床观察表明,周围神经损伤(PNI)的结果在年轻人和老年人之间存在差异。在这里,我们分析了来自年轻成人(≤60岁)和老年(60岁以下)患者的正常和去神经三角肌活检的运动终板(mep)。方法:根据irb批准的前瞻性队列研究方案,对24例因腋窝神经损伤继发的肩部病理或三角肌功能障碍接受开放手术的患者进行评估,并进行电诊断研究。手术时进行三角肌活检以评估MEP形态和神经支配状态。结果:对去神经三角肌MEPs的分析显示,在年轻组和老年组之间,健康(椒盐卷饼)和不健康(中间/斑块)形态的百分比没有显著差异。然而,在受神经支配的mep中,年轻和年老的去神经支配的三角肌的百分比有很大差异。在年轻失神经肌肉中,平均48.61%(±12.40%)的mep有神经支配,而在老年肌肉样本中,平均24.78%(±5.83%)的mep有神经支配。此外,与年轻组相比,老年组的MEP神经信号丢失的初始速率更快。讨论:我们的研究表明,年龄确实影响MEP对损伤的反应。这种影响在MEP神经支配中最为显著,在老年组中可见神经末梢迅速丧失。令人惊讶的是,老年患者的MEP形态学没有显著差异,这表明早期手术干预可能仍有显著的恢复潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信