Isometric force matching in the TRACK-HD study - a novel quantitative assessment for clinical applications?

IF 3.1 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Robin Schubert, Pascal Barallon, Benjamin Habbel, Michael Deppe, Ralf Reilmann
{"title":"Isometric force matching in the TRACK-HD study - a novel quantitative assessment for clinical applications?","authors":"Robin Schubert, Pascal Barallon, Benjamin Habbel, Michael Deppe, Ralf Reilmann","doi":"10.1177/18796397251386987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundHuntington's disease is a rare, progressive, neurodegenerative disease. Capturing symptomatic progression and treatment effects reliably in clinical therapeutic trials has shown to be a challenging task, facing the problem of small cohorts and a variable phenotype. Hence, robust and sensitive outcome measures are needed, to assess efficacy and safety of novel therapies in clinical studies with small cohorts.ObjectiveObjectives of this study were to assess feasibility, discriminative potential, and correlation to clinical and imaging endpoints of the Q-Motor isometric force matching task with visual feedback. Furthermore, a statistical comparison with the Q-Motor grasping and lifting task should be assessed.Methods220 huntingtin gene expansion carriers (HGEC) and 110 non-huntingtin gene expansion carrier (Non-HGEC) participants of the observational TRACK-HD study completed the Q-Motor force matching assessment, along with a standard battery of clinical tests (UHDRS) and MRI assessments. During the Q-Motor force matching assessments, patients were reproducing a target force in precision grip with help of visual feedback. Q-Motor utilizes a highly sensitive force transducer to record force feedback. HGEC participants were categorized into four groups by a CAG- and age-based survival score.ResultsQ-Motor force matching allowed for very good discrimination between HGEC and Non-HGEC participant groups (p < 0.001 for all but least affected HGEC group) and between different HGEC groups (all p < 0.05). Strong correlations with UHDRS scores (TMS = -0.708, TFC = -0.638), CAG-Age product scores (Survival Score = 0.626) and imaging outcomes (caudate volume = -0.609, striatum volume = -0.624) were observed. A statistical difference between correlation strength of Q-Motor force matching and Q-Motor grasping and lifting tasks could not be observed.ConclusionsCross-sectional analysis of Q-Motor force matching showed promising results, outperforming clinical rating scales in sensitivity. Further efforts are required to assess longitudinal robustness of the task, and to further explore its potential of capturing cognitive effects by increasing cognitive load during the task.</p>","PeriodicalId":16042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huntington's disease","volume":" ","pages":"18796397251386987"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huntington's disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18796397251386987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundHuntington's disease is a rare, progressive, neurodegenerative disease. Capturing symptomatic progression and treatment effects reliably in clinical therapeutic trials has shown to be a challenging task, facing the problem of small cohorts and a variable phenotype. Hence, robust and sensitive outcome measures are needed, to assess efficacy and safety of novel therapies in clinical studies with small cohorts.ObjectiveObjectives of this study were to assess feasibility, discriminative potential, and correlation to clinical and imaging endpoints of the Q-Motor isometric force matching task with visual feedback. Furthermore, a statistical comparison with the Q-Motor grasping and lifting task should be assessed.Methods220 huntingtin gene expansion carriers (HGEC) and 110 non-huntingtin gene expansion carrier (Non-HGEC) participants of the observational TRACK-HD study completed the Q-Motor force matching assessment, along with a standard battery of clinical tests (UHDRS) and MRI assessments. During the Q-Motor force matching assessments, patients were reproducing a target force in precision grip with help of visual feedback. Q-Motor utilizes a highly sensitive force transducer to record force feedback. HGEC participants were categorized into four groups by a CAG- and age-based survival score.ResultsQ-Motor force matching allowed for very good discrimination between HGEC and Non-HGEC participant groups (p < 0.001 for all but least affected HGEC group) and between different HGEC groups (all p < 0.05). Strong correlations with UHDRS scores (TMS = -0.708, TFC = -0.638), CAG-Age product scores (Survival Score = 0.626) and imaging outcomes (caudate volume = -0.609, striatum volume = -0.624) were observed. A statistical difference between correlation strength of Q-Motor force matching and Q-Motor grasping and lifting tasks could not be observed.ConclusionsCross-sectional analysis of Q-Motor force matching showed promising results, outperforming clinical rating scales in sensitivity. Further efforts are required to assess longitudinal robustness of the task, and to further explore its potential of capturing cognitive effects by increasing cognitive load during the task.

TRACK-HD研究中的等距力匹配——一种用于临床应用的新型定量评估?
背景:亨廷顿氏病是一种罕见的进行性神经退行性疾病。在临床治疗试验中可靠地捕捉症状进展和治疗效果已被证明是一项具有挑战性的任务,面临着小队列和可变表型的问题。因此,需要可靠和敏感的结果测量,以评估小型队列临床研究中新疗法的有效性和安全性。目的本研究的目的是评估具有视觉反馈的Q-Motor等距力匹配任务的可行性、鉴别潜力以及与临床和成像终点的相关性。此外,与Q-Motor抓取和提升任务进行统计比较。方法观察性TRACK-HD研究的220名亨廷顿基因扩增携带者(HGEC)和110名非亨廷顿基因扩增携带者(Non-HGEC)参与者完成了Q-Motor力匹配评估,并进行了标准的临床试验(UHDRS)和MRI评估。在Q-Motor力匹配评估中,患者在视觉反馈的帮助下精确地再现了目标力。Q-Motor采用高灵敏度的力传感器来记录力反馈。根据CAG和基于年龄的生存评分将HGEC参与者分为四组。结果q -运动力匹配允许HGEC和非HGEC参与者组之间有很好的区分(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信