Christina L. Brunnquell, Hania A. Al-Hallaq, Derek W. Brown, Jay W. Burmeister, Kristi R. G. Hendrickson, John R Vetter, Laura Padilla
{"title":"AAPM WGEPA Report 437: An introduction to entrustable professional activities for medical physics residency education","authors":"Christina L. Brunnquell, Hania A. Al-Hallaq, Derek W. Brown, Jay W. Burmeister, Kristi R. G. Hendrickson, John R Vetter, Laura Padilla","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most modern medical physics residency programs consist of a 24-month clinical training curriculum based on standards and recommendations of medical physics organizations such as the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs (CAMPEP) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Although these recommendations are extensive, their implementation is inconsistent across programs, and the quality of resident evaluation and feedback is highly variable. Competency-based medical education (CBME) is a learner-centered educational approach that focuses on whether the learner is acquiring the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to become a competent professional upon graduation. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are an example of a CBME approach that could improve the preparation of medical physicists by (1) providing a consensus-based framework for assessing the competence and independence of trainees in residency programs based on their demonstrated clinical capability, (2) facilitating feedback to residents based on their independence and competence in performing routine clinical tasks expected of a practicing medical physicist, and (3) providing a metric for programs to assess the success of their training programs and compare to other residency programs. This article describes EPAs and their potential use for assessment in medical physics residency programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most modern medical physics residency programs consist of a 24-month clinical training curriculum based on standards and recommendations of medical physics organizations such as the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs (CAMPEP) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Although these recommendations are extensive, their implementation is inconsistent across programs, and the quality of resident evaluation and feedback is highly variable. Competency-based medical education (CBME) is a learner-centered educational approach that focuses on whether the learner is acquiring the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to become a competent professional upon graduation. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are an example of a CBME approach that could improve the preparation of medical physicists by (1) providing a consensus-based framework for assessing the competence and independence of trainees in residency programs based on their demonstrated clinical capability, (2) facilitating feedback to residents based on their independence and competence in performing routine clinical tasks expected of a practicing medical physicist, and (3) providing a metric for programs to assess the success of their training programs and compare to other residency programs. This article describes EPAs and their potential use for assessment in medical physics residency programs.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic