Role of adverse psychological conditions in pain-related disability of adult spinal deformity.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jiaqi Zhang, Yangxiao Li, Yan Zeng, Weishi Li
{"title":"Role of adverse psychological conditions in pain-related disability of adult spinal deformity.","authors":"Jiaqi Zhang, Yangxiao Li, Yan Zeng, Weishi Li","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09479-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Current research on mental health in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients remains relatively scarce, particularly regarding specific psychological factors including anxiety, kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing. These negative psychological factors have been associated with worse pain and function in studies of patients with common lumbar diseases (CLD). It is currently unknown whether these psychological factors play a similar role in ASD patients. A comprehensive understanding of adverse psychological conditions within the ASD population and their associations with physical disability could enable the implementation of targeted preoperative psychological interventions, potentially improving postoperative outcomes through enhanced psychological preparedness.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to (1) compare the severity of anxiety, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing, between ASD and CLD patients; (2) evaluate their associations with pain, disability, and quality of life (QoL); and (3) identify the psychological variables which independently associated with baseline pain-related disability in ASD patients, after controlling for clinical and demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study utilized data from a longitudinally maintained database on 121 ASD and 126 CLD patients who had posterior spinal fusion surgery between March 2023 and June 2024. Patients completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 12-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2). Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and hierarchical multivariable linear regression were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ASD patients reported more prevalent and severe pain catastrophizing (25.8 ± 11.9 vs. 18.7 ± 12.7, p < 0.001; 36.4% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.022) and anxiety (STAI-Total: 91.9 ± 18.0 vs. 84.6 ± 20.3, p = 0.003; 71.9% vs. 59.5%, p = 0.045) than CLD. Trait-anxiety was the strongest correlated psychological factor with mental health in ASD (r = -0.545, p < 0.001). Pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia correlated significantly with VAS, ODI, and SF-12, especially for pain catastrophizing (r = 0.664 for ODI, p < 0.001). After controlling for confounding variables including age and pain intensity, higher pain catastrophizing was independently associated with worse physical disability (β = 0.693, p < 0.001). A hierarchical multivariable regression analysis found that 14.9% of variance in baseline ODI was explained by pain catastrophizing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the CLD patients, patients with ASD suffer from worse mental health. A range of different psychological factors, including anxiety, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing, were found to be associated with pain intensity, disability and QoL in ASD. Pain catastrophizing could explain a significant portion of variance of disability in ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09479-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Current research on mental health in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients remains relatively scarce, particularly regarding specific psychological factors including anxiety, kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing. These negative psychological factors have been associated with worse pain and function in studies of patients with common lumbar diseases (CLD). It is currently unknown whether these psychological factors play a similar role in ASD patients. A comprehensive understanding of adverse psychological conditions within the ASD population and their associations with physical disability could enable the implementation of targeted preoperative psychological interventions, potentially improving postoperative outcomes through enhanced psychological preparedness.

Purpose: This study aimed to (1) compare the severity of anxiety, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing, between ASD and CLD patients; (2) evaluate their associations with pain, disability, and quality of life (QoL); and (3) identify the psychological variables which independently associated with baseline pain-related disability in ASD patients, after controlling for clinical and demographic variables.

Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized data from a longitudinally maintained database on 121 ASD and 126 CLD patients who had posterior spinal fusion surgery between March 2023 and June 2024. Patients completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 12-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2). Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and hierarchical multivariable linear regression were performed.

Results: ASD patients reported more prevalent and severe pain catastrophizing (25.8 ± 11.9 vs. 18.7 ± 12.7, p < 0.001; 36.4% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.022) and anxiety (STAI-Total: 91.9 ± 18.0 vs. 84.6 ± 20.3, p = 0.003; 71.9% vs. 59.5%, p = 0.045) than CLD. Trait-anxiety was the strongest correlated psychological factor with mental health in ASD (r = -0.545, p < 0.001). Pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia correlated significantly with VAS, ODI, and SF-12, especially for pain catastrophizing (r = 0.664 for ODI, p < 0.001). After controlling for confounding variables including age and pain intensity, higher pain catastrophizing was independently associated with worse physical disability (β = 0.693, p < 0.001). A hierarchical multivariable regression analysis found that 14.9% of variance in baseline ODI was explained by pain catastrophizing.

Conclusion: Compared to the CLD patients, patients with ASD suffer from worse mental health. A range of different psychological factors, including anxiety, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing, were found to be associated with pain intensity, disability and QoL in ASD. Pain catastrophizing could explain a significant portion of variance of disability in ASD.

不良心理状况在成人脊柱畸形疼痛相关残疾中的作用。
背景背景:目前关于成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者心理健康的研究相对较少,特别是关于焦虑、运动恐惧症和疼痛灾难化等特定心理因素的研究。在对常见腰椎疾病(CLD)患者的研究中,这些消极的心理因素与更严重的疼痛和功能有关。目前尚不清楚这些心理因素是否在ASD患者中起着类似的作用。全面了解ASD人群的不良心理状况及其与身体残疾的关系,可以实施有针对性的术前心理干预,通过加强心理准备可能改善术后结果。目的:本研究旨在(1)比较ASD和CLD患者的焦虑、运动恐惧症和疼痛灾难化的严重程度;(2)评估其与疼痛、残疾和生活质量(QoL)的关系;(3)在控制临床和人口学变量后,确定与ASD患者基线疼痛相关残疾独立相关的心理变量。方法:本横断面研究利用了纵向数据库中的数据,这些数据来自于2023年3月至2024年6月期间进行后路脊柱融合术的121名ASD和126名CLD患者。患者完成状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)、坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TSK)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和12项健康问卷(SF-12v2)。进行分组比较、相关分析和层次多变量线性回归。结果:ASD患者报告的疼痛灾难发生率和严重程度更高(25.8±11.9比18.7±12.7,p)。结论:与CLD患者相比,ASD患者的心理健康状况更差。一系列不同的心理因素,包括焦虑、运动恐惧症和疼痛灾难化,被发现与ASD的疼痛强度、残疾和生活质量有关。疼痛灾难化可以解释ASD中残疾差异的重要部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信