Clinical outcomes of quad-loop intraocular lenses: trifocal, bifocal and toric types.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia Pub Date : 2025-10-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5935/0004-2749.2025-0085
Camila Mendes Costa Campelo, Fabricio Afonso Borges Silva, Paula Marques Marinho, Diego Casagrande, Allexya Affonso Antunes Marcos, Lincoln Lemes Freitas, Milton Seiyu Yogi, Rubens Belfort Junior
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of quad-loop intraocular lenses: trifocal, bifocal and toric types.","authors":"Camila Mendes Costa Campelo, Fabricio Afonso Borges Silva, Paula Marques Marinho, Diego Casagrande, Allexya Affonso Antunes Marcos, Lincoln Lemes Freitas, Milton Seiyu Yogi, Rubens Belfort Junior","doi":"10.5935/0004-2749.2025-0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess visual outcomes and patient satisfaction following cataract surgery involving the implantation of quad-loop intraocular lenses, including trifocal, bifocal, and toric variants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information was obtained from both physical and electronic medical records of patients who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of different intraocular lenses between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023. The study included individuals aged over 18 who received bilateral implantation of bifocal, trifocal, or monofocal toric intraocular lenses. Visual acuity was assessed at various postoperative time points using the logMAR scale. Quantitative variables were analyzed using mean and standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 92 eyes received premium intraocular lenses: 4 bifocal, 32 trifocal, 52 toric monofocal, and 4 trifocal toric lenses. The average preoperative corrected visual acuity was logMAR 0.478 ± 0.259. On the first postoperative day, the average uncorrected visual acuity was logMAR 0.301 ± 0.207. By day 30, 67.4% of eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity of logMAR 0.2 or better. Patient satisfaction was high, with few reports of glare or halos.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quad-loop intraocular lenses-including trifocal, bifocal, and toric models-demonstrated effective improvement in visual acuity and high levels of patient satisfaction. These lenses represent a suitable option for enhancing visual outcomes after cataract surgery. Additional studies with larger cohorts are recommended to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":8397,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","volume":"88 6","pages":"e20250085"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2025-0085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess visual outcomes and patient satisfaction following cataract surgery involving the implantation of quad-loop intraocular lenses, including trifocal, bifocal, and toric variants.

Methods: Information was obtained from both physical and electronic medical records of patients who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of different intraocular lenses between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023. The study included individuals aged over 18 who received bilateral implantation of bifocal, trifocal, or monofocal toric intraocular lenses. Visual acuity was assessed at various postoperative time points using the logMAR scale. Quantitative variables were analyzed using mean and standard deviation.

Results: A total of 92 eyes received premium intraocular lenses: 4 bifocal, 32 trifocal, 52 toric monofocal, and 4 trifocal toric lenses. The average preoperative corrected visual acuity was logMAR 0.478 ± 0.259. On the first postoperative day, the average uncorrected visual acuity was logMAR 0.301 ± 0.207. By day 30, 67.4% of eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity of logMAR 0.2 or better. Patient satisfaction was high, with few reports of glare or halos.

Conclusion: Quad-loop intraocular lenses-including trifocal, bifocal, and toric models-demonstrated effective improvement in visual acuity and high levels of patient satisfaction. These lenses represent a suitable option for enhancing visual outcomes after cataract surgery. Additional studies with larger cohorts are recommended to confirm these results.

四环人工晶状体的临床结果:三焦型、双焦型和环型。
目的:本研究的目的是评估白内障手术包括三焦、双焦和环型四环人工晶体植入术后的视力结果和患者满意度。方法:对2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日行白内障超声乳化手术并植入不同人工晶体的患者进行物理和电子病历分析。该研究包括18岁以上接受双焦点、三焦点或单焦点环形人工晶状体植入的个体。术后各时间点使用logMAR量表评估视力。定量变量采用均值和标准差进行分析。结果:92只眼接受了优质人工晶状体:双焦点4只,三焦点32只,单焦点52只,三焦点4只。术前平均矫正视力为logMAR 0.478±0.259。术后第1天,平均未矫正视力为logMAR 0.301±0.207。到第30天,67.4%的眼睛的未矫正距离视力达到logmar0.2或更高。患者满意度很高,很少有眩光或光晕的报告。结论:四环人工晶状体-包括三焦、双焦和环面模型-显示出有效的改善视力和高水平的患者满意度。这些晶状体是白内障手术后提高视力的合适选择。建议进行更大规模的其他研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ABO-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - electronic version), the official bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO), aims to disseminate scientific studies in Ophthalmology, Visual Science and Health public, by promoting research, improvement and updating of professionals related to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信