Quality and readability of drug fact sheets for FDA-approved and emergency use authorised drug products for COVID-19 treatment: an observational study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shelly Melissa Pranic, Jasna Karačić Zanetti, Anika Pulumati, Josipa Bukic, Doris Rušić, Ana Seselja Perisin, Dario Leksur, Darko Modun
{"title":"Quality and readability of drug fact sheets for FDA-approved and emergency use authorised drug products for COVID-19 treatment: an observational study.","authors":"Shelly Melissa Pranic, Jasna Karačić Zanetti, Anika Pulumati, Josipa Bukic, Doris Rušić, Ana Seselja Perisin, Dario Leksur, Darko Modun","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the quality of drug manufacturers' fact sheets for patients for COVID-19 therapeutics for baricitinib, convalescent plasma, anakinra, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, tocilizumab and vilobelimab, and fact sheet readability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional document analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fact sheets on COVID-19 drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2020 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcome measures: </strong>Quality assessments with the 16-item DISCERN tool scored 16-80 points and 36-item Ensuring Quality of Information for Patients (EQIP) tool scored 0-36, where lower scores indicate low-quality information. We assessed readability with Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease (ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores correspond to reading ease). Higher grades indicated hard-to-read information: Flesch-Kincaid grade level (ranges from grades 0 to 18 (college graduate)), Gunning-Fog score (ranges from grades 0 to 20 (college graduate)), Coleman-Liau index (ranges from grade 4 to college graduate), automated readability index (ranging from grades 5 to 22 (college graduate)), Dale-Chall Readability (ranges from grade 4 to college graduate) and simple measure of gobbledygook (ranges from grade 3 to college graduate). Secondary outcomes were word, syllable and sentence counts. We reported percentages and the median (IQR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 18 fact sheets that described 11 (63.5%) anti-virals (remdesivir (n=4), molnupiravir (n=4) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n=3)) and 7 (37.5%) immune modulators (tocilizumab (n=2), baricitinib (n=2), convalescent plasma (n=1), anakinra (n=1) and vilobelimab (n=1)). DISCERN (median (IQR)) reliability was 4 (IQR 3-4) and 5 (1-5), while DISCERN treatment information was 3 (1-5) and 5 (1-5) for anti-virals and immune modulators, respectively. EQIP (median (IQR)) content was 12 (11-13) and 11 (11-13), identification of information was 4 (3-4) and 3 (3-3) and structure was 9 (8-9) and 9 (9-9) for anti-virals and immune modulators, respectively. Overall, fact sheets had median readability grade levels that ranged from 6.2 to 12.4. Anti-viral and immune modulator fact sheets had median readability grade levels from 6.1 to 12.5. Median (IQR) word, >4 syllable words and sentence counts were 1646.5 (1318.3-1934.8), 25.0 (21.3-29.8) and 118.0 (92.0-152.5) overall; 1758.00 (1200.0-2181.0), 23.0 (15.0-27.0) and 134.0 (82.0-185.0) for anti-virals; and 1461.0 (1341.0-1776.0), 29.0 (23.0-46.0) and 107.0 (105.0-122.0) for immune modulators, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although of fair quality, the fact sheet reading level was high, and the transparency of sources used was low. Regulatory officials should enforce readable resources from drug manufacturers to guide patients' decision-making surrounding COVID-19 therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e101030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the quality of drug manufacturers' fact sheets for patients for COVID-19 therapeutics for baricitinib, convalescent plasma, anakinra, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, tocilizumab and vilobelimab, and fact sheet readability.

Design: Cross-sectional document analysis.

Setting: Fact sheets on COVID-19 drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2020 to 2023.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Quality assessments with the 16-item DISCERN tool scored 16-80 points and 36-item Ensuring Quality of Information for Patients (EQIP) tool scored 0-36, where lower scores indicate low-quality information. We assessed readability with Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease (ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores correspond to reading ease). Higher grades indicated hard-to-read information: Flesch-Kincaid grade level (ranges from grades 0 to 18 (college graduate)), Gunning-Fog score (ranges from grades 0 to 20 (college graduate)), Coleman-Liau index (ranges from grade 4 to college graduate), automated readability index (ranging from grades 5 to 22 (college graduate)), Dale-Chall Readability (ranges from grade 4 to college graduate) and simple measure of gobbledygook (ranges from grade 3 to college graduate). Secondary outcomes were word, syllable and sentence counts. We reported percentages and the median (IQR).

Results: We found 18 fact sheets that described 11 (63.5%) anti-virals (remdesivir (n=4), molnupiravir (n=4) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n=3)) and 7 (37.5%) immune modulators (tocilizumab (n=2), baricitinib (n=2), convalescent plasma (n=1), anakinra (n=1) and vilobelimab (n=1)). DISCERN (median (IQR)) reliability was 4 (IQR 3-4) and 5 (1-5), while DISCERN treatment information was 3 (1-5) and 5 (1-5) for anti-virals and immune modulators, respectively. EQIP (median (IQR)) content was 12 (11-13) and 11 (11-13), identification of information was 4 (3-4) and 3 (3-3) and structure was 9 (8-9) and 9 (9-9) for anti-virals and immune modulators, respectively. Overall, fact sheets had median readability grade levels that ranged from 6.2 to 12.4. Anti-viral and immune modulator fact sheets had median readability grade levels from 6.1 to 12.5. Median (IQR) word, >4 syllable words and sentence counts were 1646.5 (1318.3-1934.8), 25.0 (21.3-29.8) and 118.0 (92.0-152.5) overall; 1758.00 (1200.0-2181.0), 23.0 (15.0-27.0) and 134.0 (82.0-185.0) for anti-virals; and 1461.0 (1341.0-1776.0), 29.0 (23.0-46.0) and 107.0 (105.0-122.0) for immune modulators, respectively.

Conclusions: Although of fair quality, the fact sheet reading level was high, and the transparency of sources used was low. Regulatory officials should enforce readable resources from drug manufacturers to guide patients' decision-making surrounding COVID-19 therapeutics.

fda批准和紧急使用授权的COVID-19治疗药物说明书的质量和可读性:一项观察性研究
目的:确定药品制造商对baricitinib、恢复期血浆、anakinra、molnupiravir、nirmatrelvir/ritonavir、remdesivir、tocilizumab和vilobelimab等COVID-19治疗药物患者的情况说明书的质量,以及情况说明书的可读性。设计:横断面文档分析。背景:2020年至2023年美国食品和药物管理局批准的COVID-19药物情况说明书。主要和次要结果测量:使用16项DISCERN工具进行的质量评估得分为16-80分,使用36项“确保患者信息质量”(EQIP)工具进行的质量评估得分为0-36分,得分越低表明信息质量越低。我们用Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease(从0到100分,分数越高,阅读难度越高)来评估可读性。较高的分数表示难以阅读的信息:Flesch-Kincaid等级水平(范围从0到18(大学毕业生)),Gunning-Fog评分(范围从0到20(大学毕业生)),Coleman-Liau指数(范围从4到大学毕业生),自动可读性指数(范围从5到22(大学毕业生)),Dale-Chall可读性(范围从4到大学毕业生)和简单测量的gobbledygook(范围从3到大学毕业生)。次要结果是单词、音节和句子计数。我们报告了百分比和中位数(IQR)。结果:我们发现了18份情况说明书,其中描述了11种(63.5%)抗病毒药物(remdesivir (n=4)、molnupiravir (n=4)和nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n=3))和7种(37.5%)免疫调节剂(tocilizumab (n=2)、baricitinib (n=2)、恢复期血浆(n=1)、anakinra (n=1)和vilobelimab (n=1))。辨别(中位(IQR))信度分别为4 (IQR 3-4)和5(1-5),抗病毒药物和免疫调节剂的辨别治疗信息分别为3(1-5)和5(1-5)。抗病毒药物和免疫调节剂的EQIP(中位(IQR))含量分别为12(11-13)和11(11-13),鉴定信息分别为4(3-4)和3(3-3),结构分别为9(8-9)和9(9-9)。总体而言,事实表的可读性等级中位数在6.2到12.4之间。抗病毒和免疫调节剂说明书的中位数可读性等级为6.1至12.5。中位数(IQR)单词、>4音节单词和句子总数分别为1646.5(1318.3 ~ 1934.8)、25.0(21.3 ~ 29.8)和118.0 (92.0 ~ 152.5);1758.00(1200.0-2181.0), 23.0(15.0-27.0)和134.0(82.0-185.0)抗病毒;免疫调节剂分别为1461.0(1341.0 ~ 1776.0)、29.0(23.0 ~ 46.0)和107.0(105.0 ~ 122.0)。结论:虽然质量尚可,但情况说明书的阅读水平较高,使用来源的透明度较低。监管官员应强制要求药品制造商提供可读资源,以指导患者围绕COVID-19治疗方法做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信