Community advisory boards to inform behavioural health research in primary care: protocol for a scoping review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Katherine A McDermott, Clara C Vonderheide, Alexandria E Cronin, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Evan Plys
{"title":"Community advisory boards to inform behavioural health research in primary care: protocol for a scoping review.","authors":"Katherine A McDermott, Clara C Vonderheide, Alexandria E Cronin, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Evan Plys","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most patients receive behavioural healthcare (BH) in a primary care setting, yet much of the BH research was not developed to account for eventual implementation. Areas of research and intervention that are considered priorities to patients may be absent from our existing knowledge base. Engaging the community in the research process can facilitate translation and uptake. A key strategy for community engagement is to employ a Community Advisory Board (CAB). CABs can assist in a number of research processes, including guiding research questions to fit the priorities of the community and creating research materials that are tailored to the patient population and healthcare setting. There is variability in practices and reporting standards for CABs. The field would benefit from a summary of the state of the current literature on CAB utilisation for BH research in primary care. To fill this gap, we will conduct a scoping review to answer the question, 'What is known about the use of CABs in behavioural health studies in primary care?'.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We will use the guidelines for scoping reviews outlined by Arksey and O'Malley: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data and (5) collating, summarising and reporting the results. Our reporting of the results will be guided by the Arnos and colleagues Toolkit for Project-Based Community Advisory Boards, a set of practical guidelines for employing a CAB. To this end, we will report on how well CABs currently employed in BH primary care research match existing guidelines and what gaps need to be filled by future research.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This review does not require ethics board approval, as no patient data will be collected. We will disseminate findings primarily through journal publications and conference presentations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>This scoping review protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/pa3rz/?view_only=31c558eb395a4a9482ee9c5b57ca1c4c).</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e097144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Most patients receive behavioural healthcare (BH) in a primary care setting, yet much of the BH research was not developed to account for eventual implementation. Areas of research and intervention that are considered priorities to patients may be absent from our existing knowledge base. Engaging the community in the research process can facilitate translation and uptake. A key strategy for community engagement is to employ a Community Advisory Board (CAB). CABs can assist in a number of research processes, including guiding research questions to fit the priorities of the community and creating research materials that are tailored to the patient population and healthcare setting. There is variability in practices and reporting standards for CABs. The field would benefit from a summary of the state of the current literature on CAB utilisation for BH research in primary care. To fill this gap, we will conduct a scoping review to answer the question, 'What is known about the use of CABs in behavioural health studies in primary care?'.

Methods and analysis: We will use the guidelines for scoping reviews outlined by Arksey and O'Malley: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data and (5) collating, summarising and reporting the results. Our reporting of the results will be guided by the Arnos and colleagues Toolkit for Project-Based Community Advisory Boards, a set of practical guidelines for employing a CAB. To this end, we will report on how well CABs currently employed in BH primary care research match existing guidelines and what gaps need to be filled by future research.

Ethics and dissemination: This review does not require ethics board approval, as no patient data will be collected. We will disseminate findings primarily through journal publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: This scoping review protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/pa3rz/?view_only=31c558eb395a4a9482ee9c5b57ca1c4c).

为初级保健行为健康研究提供信息的社区咨询委员会:范围审查议定书。
简介:大多数患者在初级保健环境中接受行为保健(BH),然而许多BH研究并没有发展到最终实施的程度。在我们现有的知识库中,患者认为优先考虑的研究和干预领域可能不存在。让社区参与研究过程可以促进翻译和吸收。社区参与的一个关键策略是聘请社区咨询委员会(CAB)。cab可以在许多研究过程中提供帮助,包括指导研究问题以适应社区的优先事项,并创建适合患者群体和医疗保健环境的研究材料。cab的实践和报告标准存在可变性。该领域将受益于对初级保健中乙肝研究中CAB利用的当前文献状况的总结。为了填补这一空白,我们将进行一项范围审查,以回答这个问题:“关于在初级保健行为健康研究中使用cab,我们知道些什么?”方法和分析:我们将使用Arksey和O'Malley概述的范围评估指南:(1)确定研究问题;(2)确定相关研究;(3)研究选择;(5)整理、总结和报告结果。我们的结果报告将以Arnos及其同事的《基于项目的社区咨询委员会工具包》为指导,这是一套采用CAB的实用指南。为此,我们将报告目前在BH初级保健研究中使用的cab与现有指南的匹配程度,以及未来研究需要填补哪些空白。伦理和传播:本次审查不需要伦理委员会的批准,因为不收集患者数据。我们将主要通过期刊出版物和会议报告来传播研究结果。试验注册号:该范围审查方案已在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/pa3rz/?view_only=31c558eb395a4a9482ee9c5b57ca1c4c)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信