Evaluating the impact of easy-to-understand patient letters after discharge on patients' health literacy: a randomized controlled study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Henna Riemenschneider, Annika Rettich, Henriette Hoffmann, Rebekka Post, Ronny Zenker, Karen Voigt, Antje Bergmann, Ansgar Jonietz
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of easy-to-understand patient letters after discharge on patients' health literacy: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Henna Riemenschneider, Annika Rettich, Henriette Hoffmann, Rebekka Post, Ronny Zenker, Karen Voigt, Antje Bergmann, Ansgar Jonietz","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13464-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than half of the German population has considerable difficulties in understanding health information, reflecting limited health literacy, which is associated with poorer health outcomes. Personalized, automatically generated, easy-to-understand discharge letters (patient letters) are designed to improve patients' comprehension of medical information after hospital discharge. This study investigated whether these letters improve health literacy in cardiologic patients and explored their perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled study included 738 patients discharged from a heart center in Dresden, Germany. The control group (CG; n = 375) received a conventional discharge letter only, whereas the intervention group (IG; n = 363) additionally received a software-generated patient letter by post. Five to nine days later, participants received a sociodemographic survey and the HLS-EU-Q16 health literacy questionnaire. IG participants additionally evaluated the patient letter, and n = 15 were interviewed qualitatively to gain deeper insights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention, IG participants had significantly higher health literacy than CG participants (p = .002, Mann-Whitney U test). Over 90% of IG participants rated the patient letter as helpful, comprehensible and informative. Qualitative interviews revealed a largely positive attitude toward patient letters, along with some suggestions for content improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient letters were associated with higher post-intervention health literacy in cardiologic patients and were well received. These results suggest that broad implementation of patient letters may benefit both patients and healthcare providers by enhancing patients' understanding of medical information regarding diagnoses and treatment, potentially contributing to improved health-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on December 13, 2024 under the number DRKS00035706.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13464-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: More than half of the German population has considerable difficulties in understanding health information, reflecting limited health literacy, which is associated with poorer health outcomes. Personalized, automatically generated, easy-to-understand discharge letters (patient letters) are designed to improve patients' comprehension of medical information after hospital discharge. This study investigated whether these letters improve health literacy in cardiologic patients and explored their perceptions.

Methods: This randomized controlled study included 738 patients discharged from a heart center in Dresden, Germany. The control group (CG; n = 375) received a conventional discharge letter only, whereas the intervention group (IG; n = 363) additionally received a software-generated patient letter by post. Five to nine days later, participants received a sociodemographic survey and the HLS-EU-Q16 health literacy questionnaire. IG participants additionally evaluated the patient letter, and n = 15 were interviewed qualitatively to gain deeper insights.

Results: Post-intervention, IG participants had significantly higher health literacy than CG participants (p = .002, Mann-Whitney U test). Over 90% of IG participants rated the patient letter as helpful, comprehensible and informative. Qualitative interviews revealed a largely positive attitude toward patient letters, along with some suggestions for content improvement.

Conclusions: Patient letters were associated with higher post-intervention health literacy in cardiologic patients and were well received. These results suggest that broad implementation of patient letters may benefit both patients and healthcare providers by enhancing patients' understanding of medical information regarding diagnoses and treatment, potentially contributing to improved health-related outcomes.

Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on December 13, 2024 under the number DRKS00035706.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估出院后易于理解的病人来信对病人健康素养的影响:一项随机对照研究。
背景:一半以上的德国人口在理解健康信息方面有相当大的困难,这反映了有限的健康素养,这与较差的健康结果有关。个性化、自动生成、易于理解的出院信(患者信),旨在提高患者出院后对医疗信息的理解。本研究调查了这些信件是否提高了心脏病患者的健康素养,并探讨了他们的看法。方法:这项随机对照研究包括738名从德国德累斯顿一家心脏中心出院的患者。对照组(CG, n = 375)仅收到常规出院信,而干预组(IG, n = 363)额外收到软件生成的邮寄患者信。5至9天后,参与者接受了社会人口调查和HLS-EU-Q16健康素养问卷。IG参与者还评估了患者来信,并对n = 15进行了定性访谈,以获得更深入的见解。结果:干预后,IG参与者的健康素养显著高于CG参与者(p =。002,曼-惠特尼测试)。超过90%的IG参与者认为患者来信是有帮助的、可理解的和信息丰富的。定性访谈揭示了对患者来信的积极态度,以及对内容改进的一些建议。结论:患者来信与心脏病患者干预后较高的健康素养相关,并受到好评。这些结果表明,通过加强患者对诊断和治疗相关医疗信息的理解,广泛实施患者信函可能对患者和医疗保健提供者都有益,可能有助于改善与健康相关的结果。试验注册:该研究于2024年12月13日在德国临床试验注册中回顾性注册,编号为DRKS00035706。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信